Doughty is going to cost 8-10 million soon here.
Absolutely, considering our Cup-winning teams consisted of homegrown talent.
i guess i feel targeted for this one
difference is... if Raccoon Jesus gets scored 5 goals on 4 shots, i'll say... well, what did you expect? it's Raccoon freakin Jesus!
but Quick sold me on being the best of the best, cream of the creme
so when he consistently gives up a goal on the first 8 shots i'm kinda like WTF
if this is hard for you to grasp, it's all good but yeah ****koff as a starter is ****!
I thought of you on the Quick thing, no lieBut everything else is more the way this thread is going...absolve goalie of all wrong, blame the team. We can sure play better, but Zatkoff isn't giving us a chance to win period.
I already feel better about Budaj's positioning. He should have been the starter anyway, he earned it last year imo.
He is also watching the puck, and not covering his eyes...
so what happens first?
a roster player traded to shake things up?
a goalie acquired?
sutter fired?
put Andreoff on the first line?
Honestly this team is better than they're playing - and trading King, Clifford, and whomever you want to add on the bottom six isn't going to make them better. Every team has a bottom six of equivalent skill - that's why they're a bottom six.
What you CAN do is look for value. So trading King and Clifford can open up some room in the cap because you can likely plug in replacements for them with equivalent skills for cheaper salaries. Brown, however, is a pipe dream. Gaborik, if he returns to the form he was showing in the World Cup may have value as a deadline deal.
But what do we do with the room we've acquired? Free agency is over. We'd still have to trade some quality away to get some back - and where do we need it? The back end. The bottom six is a red herring as far as I'm concerned.
Honestly this team is better than they're playing - and trading King, Clifford, and whomever you want to add on the bottom six isn't going to make them better. Every team has a bottom six of equivalent skill - that's why they're a bottom six.
What you CAN do is look for value. So trading King and Clifford can open up some room in the cap because you can likely plug in replacements for them with equivalent skills for cheaper salaries. Brown, however, is a pipe dream. Gaborik, if he returns to the form he was showing in the World Cup may have value as a deadline deal.
But what do we do with the room we've acquired? Free agency is over. We'd still have to trade some quality away to get some back - and where do we need it? The back end. The bottom six is a red herring as far as I'm concerned.
Honestly this team is better than they're playing - and trading King, Clifford, and whomever you want to add on the bottom six isn't going to make them better. Every team has a bottom six of equivalent skill - that's why they're a bottom six.
What you CAN do is look for value. So trading King and Clifford can open up some room in the cap because you can likely plug in replacements for them with equivalent skills for cheaper salaries. Brown, however, is a pipe dream. Gaborik, if he returns to the form he was showing in the World Cup may have value as a deadline deal.
But what do we do with the room we've acquired? Free agency is over. We'd still have to trade some quality away to get some back - and where do we need it? The back end. The bottom six is a red herring as far as I'm concerned.
At this point it is not about getting better, it is about staying the same talent wise and freeing up a ton of cap space.
Lewis - expensive
Clifford - expensive and replaceable by Andreoff
King - expensive, UFA replaceable by Mersch
Even trading King if we are out allows us to see if Mersch is an option next year
Look at who we are icing on the second PP unit, it's a joke