Boston Bruins ‘22-‘23 Bruins roster and trade proposals discussions.

  • HFBoards is well aware that today is election day in the US. We ask respectfully to focus on hockey and not politics.
Status
Not open for further replies.

bme44

Registered User
Sponsor
Feb 18, 2010
3,171
2,682
Nova Scotia
Feeling better about a long playoff run with Reilly or Zboril instead of Grizz is certainly something. But I know he’s wicked small. So small it’s awful.
That is not what I am saying . I am talking about maximizing your assets and putting the best playoff team on the ice. While managing your cap and planing for the future
 

MarchysNoseKnows

Big Hat No Cattle
Feb 14, 2018
9,796
19,707
That is not what I am saying . I am talking about maximizing your assets and putting the best playoff team on the ice. While managing your cap and planing for the future
I know. I just don’t know how anyone could think Reilly or Zboril gives us a better playoff team than Grizz. I mean I do know because I read it here all the time. Because he’s wicked small.
 

Grimey

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 4, 2017
5,649
9,277
I know. I just don’t know how anyone could think Reilly or Zboril gives us a better playoff team than Grizz. I mean I do know because I read it here all the time. Because he’s wicked small.
Some people neglect all the positives purely because of his height. He gets pushed around in front of the net; he also does many other things very well. Him and Kevan Miller were a great paring.
 

bme44

Registered User
Sponsor
Feb 18, 2010
3,171
2,682
Nova Scotia
I know. I just don’t know how anyone could think Reilly or Zboril gives us a better playoff team than Grizz. I mean I do know because I read it here all the time. Because he’s wicked small.
What I am saying once again is I am not calling Reilly or Zboril better. I am saying Gryz and Reilly are both over paid. I just feel the (with out checking cap Friendly) the $3.687mil spent on Gryz could be far better used, if winning in the playoffs is the priority.

I feel a lot of people for whatever reason are very protective of #48. And IMO are not seeing the full picture when it comes to his contribution , and winning playoff games
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

bearcountry17

Registered User
Jun 4, 2012
3,325
2,049
South Shore, MA
I am not not comfortable come playoffs with Clifton.................Gryz is a much better player..
To be fair at 5on5, Clifton is a +2 in 43 playoff games. Gryz is a -17 in 59 games. He's never been better than a -2 in any year. He was on the ice for 3 times more goals against then goals for vs the Canes last year while getting over 60% offensive zone starts and only averaging 14 minutes a night. That is not good. If he was bringing Krug-eque skills to the PP it would be one thing but that's not the case.

I would be fine if they moved on. We have a pretty damn good sample size of his game just not being up to snuff in the playoffs. He doesn't belong in the top 4 on a playoff team and I would rather have a guy that brings an edge and plays tough when the tough gets going like Cliffy and Forbot or even get an actual highly skilled offensive specialist like a Klingberg, Gostisbehere, Shattenkirk(all UFAs likely to be dealt at deadline) or whomever for the 3rd pair.
 

LouJersey

Registered User
Jun 29, 2002
69,334
45,539
At the Cross
youtu.be
What I am saying once again is I am not calling Reilly or Zboril better. I am saying Gryz and Reilly are both over paid. I just feel the (with out checking cap Friendly) the $3.687mil spent on Gryz could be used far better if winning in the playoffs is the priority.

I feel a lot of people for whatever reason are very protective of #48. And IMO are not seeing the full picture when it comes to his contribution , and winning playoff games
Who was the last SC winning team that had a 5-9 defenseman in their top 4 ? (the wings had a guy 5-9 or so on the third pair vs the Pens, irc). I mean sad to say, but he is small. Doesn't make him bad. I still say you put him on the 3rd pair and take advantage of third lines in the playoffs, and I think he is a much better option that Zboril and Reilly because being bigger obvi doesn't make you better always.

To be fair at 5on5, Clifton is a +2 in 43 playoff games. Gryz is a -17 in 59 games. He's never been better than a -2 in any year. He was on the ice for 3 times more goals against then goals for vs the Canes last year while getting over 60% offensive zone starts and only averaging 14 minutes a night. That is not good. If he was bringing Krug-eque skills to the PP it would be one thing but that's not the case.

I would be fine if they moved on. We have a pretty damn good sample size of his game just not being up to snuff in the playoffs. He doesn't belong in the top 4 on a playoff team and I would rather have a guy that brings an edge and plays tough when the tough gets going like Cliffy and Forbot or even get an actual highly skilled offensive specialist like a Klingberg, Gostisbehere, Shattenkirk(all UFAs likely to be dealt at deadline) or whomever for the 3rd pair.
please don't bring up the fact that Gryz has been on the ice for 26 goals for in the playoffs and 47 goals against in the play-offs even strength in his career, those numbers mean nothing. The real stat is when he is on the ice, the team has more chances!
 

bruins19

Registered User
Aug 11, 2005
1,641
3,115
No, it doesn't clear that much. He has already spent time on the roster and would until a trade happens and that cap hit doesn't get removed after a trade.

And as I wrote in the article: it depends on whether the Bruins want to cover part or all of the Bergeron/Krejci/Swayman bonuses and how much they want to bank for trade deadline..
Thanks for the clarification, Dom.
 

DKH

Worst Poster/Awful Takes
Feb 27, 2002
76,592
57,604
I am sorry for those that consider #48 a sacred cow as another poster described him. But moving him as a player that could possibly bring you a second in the up coming draft is still the move that , I would love too see the bruins make . They have and abundance of LD so why not move one that could give you a Return. Opposed to moving Reilly and having to add another player as a sweetener

He is not a player I feel comfortable with if you are trying to go for a long playoff run
I am sure you are a nice person who buys Girl Scout cookies outside of supermarkets on Saturday mornings (I get it if you skip the Boy Scouts I still don’t know what they are selling - looks like colored nachos, but put a can out and and I’ll throw in a dollar or two but not $5 for something I’m not even sure is digestible)

However trading Grzelcyk for a second round pick 😂

I have so much stuff on my cable between HBO, Netflix, Hulu, Apple, Amazon - I gotta look and see if I’m watching the Bruins on an Alternate Universe App.

This Grzelcyk isn’t good at hockey clearly isn’t reality

Sweeney stole Lindholm maybe he can steal Wright from Kraken now 🤔 😁
Huh? Sweeney steal nothing. The Hockey Stotk brought Lindholm.
 

22Brad Park

Registered User
Nov 23, 2008
47,524
26,667
Calgary AB
Who was the last SC winning team that had a 5-9 defenseman in their top 4 ? (the wings had a guy 5-9 or so on the third pair vs the Pens, irc). I mean sad to say, but he is small. Doesn't make him bad. I still say you put him on the 3rd pair and take advantage of third lines in the playoffs, and I think he is a much better option that Zboril and Reilly because being bigger obvi doesn't make you better always.


please don't bring up the fact that Gryz has been on the ice for 26 goals for in the playoffs and 47 goals against in the play-offs even strength in his career, those numbers mean nothing. The real stat is when he is on the ice, the team has more chances!
When forecheckers get on him you me and everyone hold our breathes he dont get hurt.Saw it tonite he got flattened there behind net to Ullmarks right and I was saying please get up .Great player in open space but in own end I get nervous.Nothing to do with skill just his size.I like big D men in playoff wars .
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gordoff

Dizzay

Registered User
Jul 8, 2004
3,257
4,157
Halifax
The only moves I could see Boston making that are major (outside of becoming cap compliant)
1. RW for Bergy and Marchy- allowing Debrusk to slot in with Coyle and Zacha. The thought of having Patty Kane ride shotgun with Bergy and Marchy, then rolling out Hall-Krejci-Pasta is video game level sick. Can't see it happening but if he ever pulled a Hall and demanded Boston, you never know.
2. RW upgrade for Zacha-Coyle. Smith has been a ghost all season and I could see Boston trying to grab an upgrade there if they could dump Smith
3. Whether it be Lindholm-McAvoy and Gryz-Carlo or Gryz-McAvoy and Lindholm-Carlo, I could see the Bruins attempting to make a deal to upgrade on Gryz. Great player, thinks he gets overmatched in some playoff series that get rough and tougher.
4. Potential 4th line tough guy/13th forward
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad