aufheben
#Norris4Fox
Dude they got very easy matchups that year. Undeniably deployed as the 3rd line.On paper.
On the ice it was their best line and you know it.
Dude they got very easy matchups that year. Undeniably deployed as the 3rd line.On paper.
On the ice it was their best line and you know it.
Dude they got very easy matchups that year.
Thank you.
I just hope Zibanejad gives a ****. To me, that's the biggest loss. Brassard would lay in front of a train for his teammates.
Thank you.
I just hope Zibanejad gives a ****. To me, that's the biggest loss. Brassard would lay in front of a train for his teammates.
You're gonna like Brassard.
Snarl? Brassard? Sounds too good to be true. ..
That's not true.I don't care if they played against children, they carried that team offensively for most of the year.
Brassard and Zuccarello have carried the team offensively since he got here.
That's not true.
He had 45 points that year (Stepan had 57) and 12 in the playoffs (Stepan had 15). You are the one revising history. Brassard's line was also giving irrefutably easier matchups. Why not just talk about last year or 2014-15 when Brassard was actually the player you're describing?I love all the revisionist history on Brassard today.
He had 45 points that year (Stepan had 57) and 12 in the playoffs (Stepan had 15). You are the one revising history.
To be fair though, they said the same things about Brassard when he came to NY that they say about Zibby now.
Well you would likely be alone in saying he was more important than Stepan that year, if that is what you are trying to get across.That line was the team's best though. It wasn't close.
Well you would likely be alone in saying he was more important than Stepan that year, if that is what you are trying to get across.
To be fair though, they said the same things about Brassard when he came to NY that they say about Zibby now.
I guess I'm just shocked at how many people are saying that the Sens got hosed...
Thank you.
I just hope Zibanejad gives a ****. To me, that's the biggest loss. Brassard would lay in front of a train for his teammates.
People see that Brassard only had 7 more points than Zibanejad last year [even though that's 11 games worth of points for Zib] and assume that means that they are close in terms of their abilities. Add the 2nd round pick, and the fact that Zib is 6 years younger, and this is the reaction you get.
He's a little *******.
Ottawa doesn't care about cap. Since NY paid his bonus, Brassard makes less real salary than Zibanejad this year. Zib's qualifying offer is 3.25M, which he'll no doubt get a raise on, so it is safe to say Brassard at 3.5M over the last two years of his deal will be the same or less than what Ottawa would have had to pay Zibanejad.
People are getting way too hung up on age. This isn't a "contender" move. Ottawa didn't just give up a 1st and Marko Dano for Andrew Ladd. They acquired a first line centre who'll be on their team for the next 3+ years.
How can you say Brassard is the wrong guy to bring in? Most people following the Sens have been saying for years that aside from a top 4 veteran defenseman (Phaneuf) Ottawa's biggest need was a top 6 left handed skilled centre for faceoffs and to possibly play the half wall on the PP. If Ottawa brings in that guy, they need to trade away Zibanejad or Turris because one becomes redundant. Ottawa is a squared hole, and they just traded a circular peg for a squared one that fits.
Decent possibility. The thing that strikes me as odd is the fact that Ottawa is far from a contender, so it doesn't make a lot of sense to trade for an older player, even if he's better defensively at the moment. Unless they honestly think Zibanejad has peaked.