Last time I was mad at a trade initially was the Turris trade (mostly because of my Swedish bias) but it turned out very good I guess
Reality is we have no idea of what is going on. It's so funny to read all these comments talking in absolute!
We just traded for a player coming off a 27 goal season last year, 118 points over the last 2 years, who has better possession and shot suppression numbers, has played under Boucher for 2 years in Drummondville (06-07), is a playoff beast, local guy and people are *****ing about a 2nd round pick?.
hahaha I admit it's funny. A 2nd is great to have but you don't need an over-abundance of prospects and young players. If you can upgrade your line-up, you use those assets to do it
I may not be happy at the outset because we don't know what prompted this move (i.e. Zibby going through his summer routine of gaining protective layers around his waistline), but Brassard is no Conacher (i.e. Brassard is a proven 2C at worst or a low-end 1C a la Turris). Honeybadger was always unproven and still a move that makes no sense to me.
Bishop wasn't more proven. He was a 26 y/o goalie still not even established as a NHL back-up.
A bit of a surprising trade at first, but it's one that I think can work out for us. The more I think about it, the more it does make sense from the Sens' side. I'm not a huge fan of having to add the 2nd due to the age difference but I think it may have been done because of the $2M bonus that the Rangers already paid Brassard this year.
There are a few reasons why I believe the Sens made the trade:
1) The need for a left handed center. The move looked a bit lateral to me when I first saw the headline, but considering that Zack Smith was our only left handed C going into next year, this move gives Boucher more options depending on the situation on the ice. So trading a right handed C for a left handed C does make sense.
2) More of a commitment to win now. This move tells me that management wants to make the playoffs this year and have the team take the next step. If you think about it, a chunk of this coming season's success would depend on Zibanejad's development. Can he repeat his performance from last year and build on it? With Brassard, the team is getting a more proven commodity that steps it up in the playoffs to boot. On the other hand, the move can look bad if Zibby does take the next step and plays like a 1C.
3) Financial reasons. Yes, everyone likes to talk about the Sens' budget and Melnyk's spending. I try to avoid all the "Melnyk is cheap", "Melnyk doesn't want to open the wallet" talk, but this move looks pretty great given the Senators' financial situation. We get a 50-60 point center for 3 years and have to pay 3.5M, 3M, 3M. We don't know what Zibby commands next offseason when his contract is up. This part is a plus for the organization.
Possible reason 4) I'm totally speculating with this part, but it's possible that Ottawa didn't like Zibanejad's development. We can speculate all we want about the overweight and conditioning issues, maybe it was an issue with the new coaching regime, who knows. The other thing to consider is that this year was probably a make-or-break year for Zibby's value..maybe the team wanted to cash in on his potential and get value back in case this year didn't go so well for Zibanejad.
Overall, I think I like the trade, but it will all come down to how Zibanejad develops in the next 2 years.
Can you please post more on this board? Okay thanks, posters like you are needed
Can't love this top 9. Top 6 is decent, top 7 is good, but Smith and Lazar don't scare anyone.
Goalies disagreed with that 25 times last season
I'm not a fan of this move but If it gets us to the playoffs it's good.
To me this move signals that the rebuild is done and this teams moving towards winning... So that's what I will base it on.
If the Sens miss the playoffs then this move was a bust
Yes, you're right... The team is saying by this move that they want to take the next step, which would be to build on the 2014-15 season and win a playoffs round (or more)
Also this was a overpayment. The gap between Zibanejad and Brassard is not a 2nd round pick.
Is it based on just looking at points? We loved Zibanejad, but that would be like saying that the gap between Turris and Zibanejad is not a 2nd round pick.
We gave a 2nd round pick for the difference between Brassard and Zibanejad, despite the age, and also for the fact that Brassard will basically have a cap hit (average salary) of 3.33 for the next 3 years
His contract is so attractive, I am surprised it only cost a 2nd to upgrade Zibanejad to Brassard.
The Sens prospect pool is so depleated beyond the top three... And now they don't have 2nds the next two drafts
False. Perron, Paul, Gagne, Englund, Hogberg, Dzingel, Jaros, etc are good prospects. Top-15 is in good shape, Puempel is the 12th best prospect.