Confirmed with Link: Zetterlund, Robins, 4th to Ottawa for 2025 2nd, Zack Ostapchuk, Noah Gregor

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
cut to macklin standing on his toes in front of a stadiometer to try to make it to 6' as GM MG furrows his brow
1741382047822.png
 
Someone mentioned the human cost in another thread earlier and while I don't think there is any of that in getting rid of Walman and Kunin, Zetterlund felt like someone who really gelled with the kids. And he was young enough to be part of the core for a while. We can't just have a team of 19-21 year olds. That's not realistic. I don't think Zetterlund himself is some amazing piece, but I do worry that when its time for Eklund and later Smith/Celebring to sign their first non rookie deals, will they start asking themselves why stay here? What does San Jose offer them that other teams don't? You are not winning much here, but now your buddies are moving on too.
Probably why Toffoli demanded a NMC. He probably would have been gone after that sleepover stunt.
 
He's putting up 0.733 points per game in the minors as a 21 year old

That's a nothing player

Come on dude, this is an insanely overconfident statement re:Ostapchuk. None of us know very much about him besides the fact that he is big and his production is god awful.

Agree with everything else you're saying about Zetterlund - I wanted to trade him - but this is a shitty return and I'd rather have waited until the offseason if this was all we could get.
Zetterlund's career AHL points per game at Ostapchuk's age was 0.48

I'm not saying Ostapchuk is going to be as good as Zetterlund but his production is only "godawful" if you're expecting him to become a top six forward. Being a full-time player on the Sens this year is a promising sign as is the fact he's big, physical and can play center. Lots of ways he can make himself useful in a contender's bottom six.

I really think Zetterlund's arbitration case may have scared Grier. The stats used in these cases are pretty limited and I could easily see his agent arguing that Zetterlund being +8 on a -72 team makes him extremely valuable even though we all know that doesn't actually reflect his impact.
 
youll never believe who scored at a worse rate in their D+4 season, while not even sniffing NHL time until the following season.
zetterlund himself

again the prime asset may be the 2025 2nd. Grier might want to make another move with that pick like he did the NJD and package it with the Dal 1 to move around.
Every player takes a different development path. Zetterlund beating the odds doesn't change what the odds are for Ostapchuk, and there's no reason to center your current evaluation of Zetterlund on what his odds were 4 years ago when it's already clear he's beaten them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lebanezer
I've generally really liked Grier but this trade gives me a bad feeling about the "building back up" part of this rebuild. If we're trading Zetterlund for guys like Noah Gregor and Ostapchuk, what the hell is the vision for this team, exactly? Celebrini, Smith, Eklund and a bunch of large 4th liners?
One thing that seems abundantly clear to me from this deadline is that he wants this team to be a lot bigger
 
I mean hes gone from 28p in 69gp to 11 in 15g in the AHL in 1 year and is only 21. Lets not act like hes a 25year old scoring 28 in 69gp still.

Im not even saying this is a good trade, but the sky is falling chicken little style act of the board again means sharks hockey is BACK
11 points in 15 AHL games is meaningless this season. One or two bad bounces and he's back at that 0.5 PPG pace.

Ostapchuk has never scored at anything resembling the pace of a guy who is going to be score at a top-9 level in the NHL. This is a fourth liner.
 
Zetterlund's career AHL points per game at Ostapchuk's age was 0.48

I'm not saying Ostapchuk is going to be as good as Zetterlund but his production is only "godawful" if you're expecting him to become a top six forward. Being a full-time player on the Sens this year is a promising sign as is the fact he's big, physical and can play center. Lots of ways he can make himself useful in a contender's bottom six.

I really think Zetterlund's arbitration case may have scared Grier. The stats used in these cases are pretty limited and I could easily see his agent arguing that Zetterlund being +8 on a -72 team makes him extremely valuable even though we all know that doesn't actually reflect his impact.
The Sens putting him in that spot is mildly encouraging I agree but that encouragement is almost entirely killed off by the fact that he's been one of the worst players in the NHL in that spot.
 
Is 50 points really "top 6 scoing" in today's scoring environment

I like Zetterlund a lot and think he's useful but on a good team he's a 3rd line scorer that can fill in higher in the lineup in case of injury

I wanted to keep him, but I can understand Mike being apprehensive if he was asking for like $7M a season
I think he's an in between guy. High end third line, low end second line player. Because he played on the first line last season, I think there's a tendency to overrate him. But he's young and not unrestricted so I would have had to have a compelling offer to move him and this isn't it.
 

Ad

Ad