zeke's Official Top-20 Center Rankings

Status
Not open for further replies.

leaffaninvancouver

formerly in Victoria
Jan 11, 2012
13,819
8,328
Again: Joe Thornton will immediately become, not better, but greater player for winning the Cup. Just like Ovechkin did. In the most people's rankings he immediately jumped from mid-20s to the lower 10s. He is now breathing down Crosby's neck, which was practically unthinkable last year. All for two reasons: winning the Cup and performing in playoffs.

Currently Thornton doesn't make my Top 120 players of all time. If he wins it, he is in. Currently he is in the Top 5 Best players not to win the Cup (after Dionne, Park, and a couple of others). I'm sure it's a huge consolation to him.

You understand how absolutely insane that makes you sound right? You think the player with the 16th most points and 12th soon to be 11th most assists isn’t one of the 120 best players of all time?

I get that you’re saying playoffs matter but you’ve taken this to a crazy extreme.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gary Nylund

Adtar02

@NateThompson44 is a bum
Apr 8, 2012
4,948
5,815
2nd star 2 the right
giroux is such a weird case I'm happy not to stretch the definitions to include him. tbh as funny as it sounds he wouldn't even crack the top-30 in p1/60 over the last 2yrs, so he would have been excluded from my list even based on that. just such a bizarre turn for him last year that it's hard to know what to make of it, with or without stats.
Honestly if your waiting p1/60. You should wait raw production as well cause it counts for being healthy. Not sure I agree with the entire list but some players who should be nothiced are but some are missing. Being healthy is huge in this league.
 

Sentinel

Registered User
May 26, 2009
13,233
5,043
New Jersey
www.vvinenglish.com
You understand how absolutely insane that makes you sound right? You think the player with the 16th most points and 12th soon to be 11th most assists isn’t one of the 120 best players of all time?

I get that you’re saying playoffs matter but you’ve taken this to a crazy extreme.
Mike Gartner is #7 and Jarome Iginla is #15 all time in goals. They are not on that list either. Ron Francis is #5 and Mark Recchi is # 12 all time in points. They barely made it. Kent Nilsson is #9 all time in PPG. Didn't make it. Other people were better, especially in playoffs.

Thornton is a prototypical choker. He doesn't even have the Marcel Dionne excuse of playing on crappy teams (and Dionne sucked in playoffs all the same). He just choked time and time again in playoffs. So -- nuh-uh.
 

Sentinel

Registered User
May 26, 2009
13,233
5,043
New Jersey
www.vvinenglish.com
The more teams in the league the harder it is to win a cup. Great players will increasingly never win one.
Actually, the opposite is true. In the past, star players played mostly for the same team (with few notable exception). Nowdays, they play from contract to contract. It's easier to switch teams and just go chasing the Cup. It rarely works, but it worked for Hossa, Kessel, and G

In the past ten years only five teams won the Cup. In the 1960s three teams won. In the 1970s three teams won. In the 1980s -- four teams won.
 

leaffaninvancouver

formerly in Victoria
Jan 11, 2012
13,819
8,328
Actually, the opposite is true. In the past, star players played mostly for the same team (with few notable exception). Nowdays, they play from contract to contract. It's easier to switch teams and just go chasing the Cup. It rarely works, but it worked for Hossa, Kessel, and G

In the past ten years only five teams won the Cup. In the 1960s three teams won. In the 1970s three teams won. In the 1980s -- four teams won.

You know the league keeps growing that’s what makes it harder. Also great players are often drafted by bad teams and then stick with them 10-11 years. The league also keeps growing, its mathematically harder to win a cup. Are you seriously going to argue with math?
 

Revelation

Registered User
Aug 15, 2016
5,298
2,963
So the #1C on the reigning cup champion who scored the most playoff points since Malkin and has been statistically comparable to Schiefele isn't a top 20 C in the NHL and would be the #4C on the Leafs.

Should the rest of the NHL just forfeit 2018-2019? Maybe the caps players can cross out their names on the cup and write in the leafs names instead as a courtesy.
 

Drytoast

Registered User
Sep 27, 2017
6,578
4,785
So the #1C on the reigning cup champion who scored the most playoff points since Malkin and has been statistically comparable to Schiefele isn't a top 20 C in the NHL and would be the #4C on the Leafs.

Should the rest of the NHL just forfeit 2018-2019? Maybe the caps players can cross out their names on the cup and write in the leafs names instead as a courtesy.

And if it wouldnt be too much trouble could you please have ovechkin hand deliver the cup to matthews? That would be great!
 

Alf the dwarf

Registered User
Jul 20, 2018
243
188
And by official, I mean mine, of course.

So after all the fighting on the other threads, i tried to crank out a stats-based Center ranking, but nothing too fancy. At the same time it's both complicated and simple.


NOTE: IF YOU HATE STATS JUST SKIP TO THE BOTTOM FOR THE FINAL RANKINGS


Here's how I approached it.

I looked at the last 2 seasons. This imo is the best combo of "recent" and "good sample size" to judge a player's current value. But it's not perfect, of course, especially when it comes to very young or old players. But it's a good place to start. Second, I put an absolute cutoff at a minimum of 14 ES minutes played per game.

So firstly, I used "Offense" as my most basic criteria for the list of "top centers". i.e. to be a top center, you have to score like one, and if you can't score, you're not a top center no matter how good you are defensively. To judge offense, I used the even strength p/60 and p1/60 stats - basically I ranked the top-30 centers in p/60, and the top-30 centers in p1/60, and then combined the ranks. I know some people might complain about ignoring PP production, but imo PP production is way too noisy and small sample and any offensive ability the players have should show up at even strength anyways. But that wasn't enough - I wanted to adjust this offense for quality of competition as well - so that guys with easier matchups didn't get extra credit. I used opponents' ice time (TOIqoc) to judge quality of competition, and combined it with the scoring ranks. Note that this used their league-wide TOIqoc ranks, of all centers who played minimum 14es mpg. Here's the list of Top Offensive Centers I came up with:

Top Offensive Centers Last 2yrs

1.McDavid 7
2.MacKinnon 22
3.Scheifele 25
4.Crosby 27
5.Matthews 31
6.Barkov 33
7.Malkin 34
8.Stamkos 37
9.Tavares 40
10.Getzlaf 41
11.Backstrom 46
11.Couturier 46
13.Kopitar 48
13.Barzal 48
15.Toews 49
15.Monahan 49
17.Kuznetsov 52
18.Seguin 54
19.Kadri 56
20.Staal 58
21.Bergeron 60
22.Eichel 60
23.Point 68
24.Duchene 72
25.Stastny 72
26.Zetterberg 73
27.Krejci 89
28.Horvat 92

Some surprises on this list when QOC is factored in - namely, that a guy like Toews is still quite good offensively, while guys like Malkin and Kuz really get hammered for going up against much easier competition than most of the others.


Secondly, I wanted to factor in Possession. This was a bit more complicated, but basically I averaged out zone/score adjusted CF% and xGF% and ranked them, and then averaged out zone/score adjusted CFrel and xGFrel and ranked them......and then combined their ranks. Now key here is that I kind of cheated - because I was using OFFENSE as the main determinant of "top center", I didn't look at league-wide possession, but I only looked at the 28 centers who made the Offense list and ranked their possession against each other. I think the basic principal makes sense, though of course my execution of it is pretty hacktastic. And then, again, I needed to adjust for Quality of Competition, so once again I combined the averaged possession ranks with the TOIqoc ranks, and ranked these 28 centers' possession against each other:

Last 2yrs best offensive centers in order of Possession:

1.Bergeron 10
2.McDavid 12
3.Crosby 18
4.Couturier 21
5.Kopitar 28
6.Toews 29
7.Barkov 30
8.Scheifele 32
9.Tavares 39
10.Backstrom 39
11.MacKinnon 41
12.Getzlaf 44
13.Stastny 49
14.Staal 51
15.Kadri 54
16.Stamkos 55
17.Matthews 57
18.Point 59
19.Zetterberg 60
20.Seguin 61
21.Barzal 61
22.Malkin 70
23.Monahan 71
24.Duchene 72
25.Eichel 74
26.Kuznetsov 82
27.Krejci 83
28.Horvat 87

this seems to pass the smell test to me. all the guys with the great defensive reputations are right at the top, while the guys at the bottom are the guys you expect.

So now with these two lists, I just combined the qoc-adjusted offense and the qoc-adjusted possession, and it spat out this list:

ZEKE'S PERFECT TOP-20 CENTER RANKINGS

1.McDavid 19
2.Crosby 45
3.Scheifele 57
4.Barkov 63
5.MacKinnon 63
6.Couturier 67
7.Bergeron 70
8.Kopitar 76
9.Toews 78
10.Tavares 79
11.Getzlaf 85
12.Backstrom 85
13.Matthews 88
14.Stamkos 92
15.Malkin 104
16.Staal 109
17.Barzal 109
18.Kadri 110
19.Seguin 115
20.Monahan 120

Some guys stick out in surprising ways here - Couturier comes out looking really, really good, while a guy like Malkin drops way down. Guys like Kuznetsov and Eichel don't even make the list at all. Thing is, I don't have any problem with any of those results. In the end, I love how the list rewards guys like Barkov and Bergeron while also acknowledging the question marks on guys like Malkin and Barzal.

Note, though, that this isn't a prediction of which centers are necessarily the best RIGHT NOW, heading into THIS SEASON. To do that I would want to add in some kind of Age adjustment, which would favor which would bump up kids like Eichel, Barzal, Matthews while knocking down guys like Backstrom and Staal a bit.



So what do you think? does my list beat the NHL's? or the famous Hockey Guy's?

or is it poop?

Great job! Only surprise for me is Malkin as 15. Would have imagined him to be in top 5.
 

Peggy

Registered User
Aug 6, 2016
5,274
1,307
no doubt I place great importance on QOC. thing is, Malkin is the actual 2nd line center that gets turned into a 1st line center by other stats. Couts, Toews, Monahan are all clearcut #1Cs on their teams, not sheltered 2nd line guys. And kadri over the last 2yrs started as the #1C as Matthews was eased into the league.



true, though again the difference you're thinking of is probably exaggerated by PP minutes. and I still think the PP is way too prone to small sample fluke and opporunity to get a good read from it. I'm not really sure why a player's superior true talent offense wouldn't show up at even strength.

and, of course, if we include PP we should probably include PK too.

But here's how these 28 rank in PP p/60 over the last 2yrs

1.Stamkos 7.51
2.Malkin 7.11
3.Backstrom 6.70
4.Seguin 6.45
5.Crosby 6.44
6.Kadri 6.33
7.Matthews 6.29
8.Eichel 6.12
9.Kuznetsov 6.00
10.McDavid 5.72
11.MacKinnon 5.71
12.Barzal 5.65
13.Kopitar 5.63
14.Bergeron 5.52
15.Getzlaf 5.32
16.Tavares 5.41
17.Staal 5.05
18.Krejci 4.71
19.Horvat 4.47
20.Scheifele 4.12
21.Zetterberg 4.06
22.Barkov 3.98
23.Point 3.92
24.Monahan 3.91
25.Toews 3.88
26.Stastny 3.44
27.Duchene 2.98
28.Couturier 2.56

and p1/60:

1.Stamkos 5.82
2.Kadri 5.28
3.Seguin 4.78
4.Crosby 4.65
5.Bergeron 4.65
6.Matthews 4.49
7.Malkin 4.43
8.MacKinnon 4.22
9.Backstrom 3.97
10.Tavares 3.94
11.Getzlaf 3.87
12.Kuznetsov 3.77
13.Staal 3.75
14.Horvat 3.72
15.Eichel 3.70
16.Krejci 3.49
17.Monahan 3.32
18.McDavid 3.23
19.Kopitar 3.14
20.Stastny 2.97
21.Zetterberg 2.84
22.Barzal 2.82
23.Duchene 2.54
24.Toews 2.44
25.Barkov 2.33
26.Scheifele 2.27
27.Point 2.05
28.Couturier 1.92

and then we combine them:

1.Stamkos 2
2.Seguin 7
3.Kadri 8
4.Crosby 9
5.Malkin 9
6.Backstrom 12
7.Matthews 13
8.MacKinnon 19
9.Bergeron 19
10.Kuznetsov 21
11.Eichel 23
12.Tavares 26
13.Getzlaf 26
14.McDavid 28
15.Staal 30
16.Kopitar 32
17.Horvat 33
18.Barzal 34
19.Krejci 34
20.Monahan 41
21.Zetterberg 42
22.Stastny 46
23.Scheifele 46
24.Barkov 47
25.Toews 49
26.Point 50
27.Duchene 50
28.Couturier 56

already I think you can see more anomalies pop up in the PP numbers, most of which is likely just small sample size issue. Or maybe scheifele really just sucks on the PP for some reason, I dunno.

Including the PP numbers would give a solid boost to Stamkos/Seguin/Kadri/Crosby/Malkin (2-3 spots maybe?) and would hurt Scheifele, Barkov, Toews, Couturier by a similar amount.

If I just eyeball it, maybe it would change my list into this?


1.McDavid 19
2.Crosby 45
3.MacKinnon 63
4.Bergeron 70
5.Scheifele 57
6.Barkov 63
7.Kopitar 76
8.Tavares 79
9.Couturier 67
10.Stamkos 92
11.Backstrom 85
12.Matthews 88
13.Getzlaf 85
14.Toews 78
15.Malkin 104
16.Kadri 110
17.Seguin 115
18.Staal 109
19.Barzal 109
20.Monahan 120

maybe something like that? does that look better?

When you're looking individual stts are you also considering team stats?
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
1. Chris Osgood won two Stanley Cups as a starter, in 98 and in 08, and almost won the third one in 09. You bet your ass he was one of the Top 10 goalies in the league those years. He had a legitimate claim for a Conn Smythe in 08 and would unquestionably win in 09, had the Wings repeated.

2. Winning a Cup absolutely makes you a better center, or, at least, a more highly ranked center (Toews' entire claim to immortality lies with the fact that he was the 1C on three Cup winners). But Kuznetsov didn't just win the Cup. He lead his team in points while winning the Cup and had a legitimate claim for the Conn Smythe. He is in the Top 5, worst case scenario.

To sum up: this list is ridiculous and best left where no one can see it.

1.toews has much more than that going for him. as you can see on this list, he still ranks well even now in his"bad" years

2.many players have had great scoring runs in the playoffs. especially guys like mix who got the easy matchups as Backstrom took the tough ones.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
We’re in agreement on Kadri. I didn’t expect it to be controversial to say he shouldn’t be in the top 15 TBH. High end number three or low end number two is where I’d slot him.

please explain why kadri is a 3rd line C.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
It's an interesting model, even if I don't agree with some of the results.

Any particular reason you used TOI.QoC for the QoC measure? In my experience, that's generally used to see who's going up against the top Dpairing, but not necessarily who's going up against the top lines as far as possession or scoring chance generation (which would be CF.QoC and xGF.QoC, at least on corsica).

Though depending on who you ask, the defensive matchups against a forward line, means a lot more than the forward matchup against a forward line...

Just curious. I appreciate the work! :)


basically, the analytics community was correct when they proved possession-based QOC didn't matter....but not because competition didn't matter, but because using possession as a proxy of quality to adjust someone else's possession never made any sense - it literally cancelled itself out.

TOI is a nice proxy for quality because when we look at league wide TOI, who don't fall prey to one coach's biases or system - we're looking at every coach's and system's decision on which players deserve to play the most on average, which gives us a solid assessment of player quality that is completely independent of possession metrics. so you can quibble with certain coaches playing certain player's too much or too little, but it's much harder to object to league wide average ice time distribution.

but that's just the theory - in practice I've found that it's very easy to track the effect of TOIqoc on all the other stats - and very common to see players excel in all the stats when playing against weak TOIqoc qnd then falling apart when moved up the lineup.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
if its "Last 2yrs" why is barzal on this list? unless youre counting the 2 games he played the season before as a the 1st year of 2

barzal just squeezed in on every minimum qualification I put up. I could have made up a new qualification just to disqualify him but decided not to.

but yes, his stats are amongst the iffiest because it's the smallest sample.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
To the OP: Kuznetsov is somewhere in the Top 5. Anything lower is an insult to a 1C on a Cup winner who lead all playoffs in points.

Kuz was not the #1C on a cup winner.

he does join an illustrious list with guys like Krejci, B.Richards, J.Carter, etc. as 2nd line Cs who have led cup winning teams in scoring but were never top5 centers.
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
How did Toews end up so high?

I'm a fan, but he sure takes a lot of ****.

basically because nobody in hockey gets tougher usage than he does, and because He's actually a good producer at even strength. it's the PP that's killing his offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Machinehead

njdevils1982

Hell Toupée!!!
Sep 8, 2006
40,223
28,378
North of Toronto
barzal just squeezed in on every minimum qualification I put up. I could have made up a new qualification just to disqualify him but decided not to.

but yes, his stats are amongst the iffiest because it's the smallest sample.


thanks, was just curious…..interesting topic you started.

also curious as to where these stats can be found… ive looked and some sites but dont filter as well as others.

cheers
 

zeke

The Dube Abides
Mar 14, 2005
66,937
36,957
how come you go with even strength production rather than 5v5?

stems from me trying to make the simplest breakdowns without throwing away data....so when I do player comps I break it down into ES / PP / PK and don't throw away the 4on4 and 3on3s all while keeping it fairly simple.

but you might have a point - since I'm already ignoring special teams in this case maybe I should use just 5v5.

I'll try it out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad