zeke's Official Top-20 Center Rankings

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gary Nylund

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
31,098
24,492
You really should read posts in full before you reply, at no point did he suggest your opinion made you a Leaf hater, he said that people who said Kadri was a third line center were.

Posters take shots at all of the teams. Take it as a compliment. When the Canucks were a top team they got lots of attacks. Honestly it’s childish to refer to people who disagree as haters. People need to develop a thicker skin. I mean it’s just hockey, not life or death.

You must have missed the above post. Anyhow I agree, hater is a pointless term. I rarely use it but I'm not going to apologize for using it either as I see so much anti Leaf BS on these boards (is anti Leaf better than saying hater?) the I can forgive myself for the occasional moment of weakness.

Anyhow, great job Zeke. Would be cool if someone who really thinks the list sucks came up with a better one. And I don't mean just putting a bunch of names in order, I mean coming up with some sort of formula and then being prepared to explain why their formula is better than what Zeke used. Interesting discussion though, not a bad list overall IMO and frankly, while many will say Kadri's too high I've heard that tune before and rarely is it backed up by anything much.
 

leaffaninvancouver

formerly in Victoria
Jan 11, 2012
13,819
8,328
1. Chris Osgood won two Stanley Cups as a starter, in 98 and in 08, and almost won the third one in 09. You bet your ass he was one of the Top 10 goalies in the league those years. He had a legitimate claim for a Conn Smythe in 08 and would unquestionably win in 09, had the Wings repeated.

2. Winning a Cup absolutely makes you a better center, or, at least, a more highly ranked center (Toews' entire claim to immortality lies with the fact that he was the 1C on three Cup winners). But Kuznetsov didn't just win the Cup. He lead his team in points while winning the Cup and had a legitimate claim for the Conn Smythe. He is in the Top 5, worst case scenario.

To sum up: this list is ridiculous and best left where no one can see it.

You understand in order to make this list applicable to everyone that the playoffs aren't factored in. How would you rank him as a center the last two seasons? His numbers aren't anywhere close to top 5.

Edit ** McDavid is the best center in the league, winning a cup doesn't magically make him better. You need a good team around you to win a cup. The playoffs are an extremely small sample to judge how good a player is.
 

JaegerDice

The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
Dec 26, 2014
25,559
10,216
It's an interesting model, even if I don't agree with some of the results.

Any particular reason you used TOI.QoC for the QoC measure? In my experience, that's generally used to see who's going up against the top Dpairing, but not necessarily who's going up against the top lines as far as possession or scoring chance generation (which would be CF.QoC and xGF.QoC, at least on corsica).

Though depending on who you ask, the defensive matchups against a forward line, means a lot more than the forward matchup against a forward line...

Just curious. I appreciate the work! :)
 

Sentinel

Registered User
May 26, 2009
13,233
5,043
New Jersey
www.vvinenglish.com
You understand in order to make this list applicable to everyone that the playoffs aren't factored in. How would you rank him as a center the last two seasons? His numbers aren't anywhere close to top 5.

Edit ** McDavid is the best center in the league, winning a cup doesn't magically make him better. You need a good team around you to win a cup. The playoffs are an extremely small sample to judge how good a player is.
Yeah, who cares about such insignificant things as Stanley Cup playoffs? :sarcasm:
Playoffs is the MOST important criteria to judge a player. Everything else matters much, much less. Ask any player, really.

P.S. Winning the Stanley Cup will do marvels for McDavid's standings and legacy. Too bad it's not likely happen any time soon. :confused:
 

JaegerDice

The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
Dec 26, 2014
25,559
10,216
Sorted QoT by descending rank
List RankNameQoTQoT Desc Rank
1Bergeron31.4120
2McDavid30.7816
3Crosby30.6313
4Couturier31.5121
5Kopitar31.8824
6Toews30.175
7Barkov31.8723
8Scheifele32.1427
9Tavares30.326
10Backstrom31.319
11MacKinnon32.126
12Getzlaf32.0425
13Stastny30.8517
14Staal30.7615
15Kadri30.397
16Stamkos30.5812
17Matthews31.2518
18Point30.014
19Zetterberg30.468
20Seguin31.6122
21Barzal29.693
22Malkin30.5711
23Monahan32.2728
24Duchene30.59
25Eichel30.7214
26Kuznetsov30.5110
27Krejci29.511
28Horvat29.632
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

What QoT rank? CF.QoT? xGF.QoT?
 

njdevils1982

Hell Toupée!!!
Sep 8, 2006
40,223
28,378
North of Toronto
And by official, I mean mine, of course.

So after all the fighting on the other threads, i tried to crank out a stats-based Center ranking, but nothing too fancy. At the same time it's both complicated and simple.


NOTE: IF YOU HATE STATS JUST SKIP TO THE BOTTOM FOR THE FINAL RANKINGS


Here's how I approached it.

I looked at the last 2 seasons. This imo is the best combo of "recent" and "good sample size" to judge a player's current value. But it's not perfect, of course, especially when it comes to very young or old players. But it's a good place to start. Second, I put an absolute cutoff at a minimum of 14 ES minutes played per game.

So firstly, I used "Offense" as my most basic criteria for the list of "top centers". i.e. to be a top center, you have to score like one, and if you can't score, you're not a top center no matter how good you are defensively. To judge offense, I used the even strength p/60 and p1/60 stats - basically I ranked the top-30 centers in p/60, and the top-30 centers in p1/60, and then combined the ranks. I know some people might complain about ignoring PP production, but imo PP production is way too noisy and small sample and any offensive ability the players have should show up at even strength anyways. But that wasn't enough - I wanted to adjust this offense for quality of competition as well - so that guys with easier matchups didn't get extra credit. I used opponents' ice time (TOIqoc) to judge quality of competition, and combined it with the scoring ranks. Note that this used their league-wide TOIqoc ranks, of all centers who played minimum 14es mpg. Here's the list of Top Offensive Centers I came up with:

Top Offensive Centers Last 2yrs

1.McDavid 7
2.MacKinnon 22
3.Scheifele 25
4.Crosby 27
5.Matthews 31
6.Barkov 33
7.Malkin 34
8.Stamkos 37
9.Tavares 40
10.Getzlaf 41
11.Backstrom 46
11.Couturier 46
13.Kopitar 48
13.Barzal 48
15.Toews 49
15.Monahan 49
17.Kuznetsov 52
18.Seguin 54
19.Kadri 56
20.Staal 58
21.Bergeron 60
22.Eichel 60
23.Point 68
24.Duchene 72
25.Stastny 72
26.Zetterberg 73
27.Krejci 89
28.Horvat 92

Some surprises on this list when QOC is factored in - namely, that a guy like Toews is still quite good offensively, while guys like Malkin and Kuz really get hammered for going up against much easier competition than most of the others.


Secondly, I wanted to factor in Possession. This was a bit more complicated, but basically I averaged out zone/score adjusted CF% and xGF% and ranked them, and then averaged out zone/score adjusted CFrel and xGFrel and ranked them......and then combined their ranks. Now key here is that I kind of cheated - because I was using OFFENSE as the main determinant of "top center", I didn't look at league-wide possession, but I only looked at the 28 centers who made the Offense list and ranked their possession against each other. I think the basic principal makes sense, though of course my execution of it is pretty hacktastic. And then, again, I needed to adjust for Quality of Competition, so once again I combined the averaged possession ranks with the TOIqoc ranks, and ranked these 28 centers' possession against each other:

Last 2yrs best offensive centers in order of Possession:

1.Bergeron 10
2.McDavid 12
3.Crosby 18
4.Couturier 21
5.Kopitar 28
6.Toews 29
7.Barkov 30
8.Scheifele 32
9.Tavares 39
10.Backstrom 39
11.MacKinnon 41
12.Getzlaf 44
13.Stastny 49
14.Staal 51
15.Kadri 54
16.Stamkos 55
17.Matthews 57
18.Point 59
19.Zetterberg 60
20.Seguin 61
21.Barzal 61
22.Malkin 70
23.Monahan 71
24.Duchene 72
25.Eichel 74
26.Kuznetsov 82
27.Krejci 83
28.Horvat 87

this seems to pass the smell test to me. all the guys with the great defensive reputations are right at the top, while the guys at the bottom are the guys you expect.

So now with these two lists, I just combined the qoc-adjusted offense and the qoc-adjusted possession, and it spat out this list:

ZEKE'S PERFECT TOP-20 CENTER RANKINGS

1.McDavid 19
2.Crosby 45
3.Scheifele 57
4.Barkov 63
5.MacKinnon 63
6.Couturier 67
7.Bergeron 70
8.Kopitar 76
9.Toews 78
10.Tavares 79
11.Getzlaf 85
12.Backstrom 85
13.Matthews 88
14.Stamkos 92
15.Malkin 104
16.Staal 109
17.Barzal 109
18.Kadri 110
19.Seguin 115
20.Monahan 120

Some guys stick out in surprising ways here - Couturier comes out looking really, really good, while a guy like Malkin drops way down. Guys like Kuznetsov and Eichel don't even make the list at all. Thing is, I don't have any problem with any of those results. In the end, I love how the list rewards guys like Barkov and Bergeron while also acknowledging the question marks on guys like Malkin and Barzal.

Note, though, that this isn't a prediction of which centers are necessarily the best RIGHT NOW, heading into THIS SEASON. To do that I would want to add in some kind of Age adjustment, which would favor which would bump up kids like Eichel, Barzal, Matthews while knocking down guys like Backstrom and Staal a bit.



So what do you think? does my list beat the NHL's? or the famous Hockey Guy's?

or is it poop?


if its "Last 2yrs" why is barzal on this list? unless youre counting the 2 games he played the season before as a the 1st year of 2
 

Maplebeasts

I See Demons!!!!!
Oct 26, 2014
20,918
12,625
Barrie, Ontario
We’re in agreement on Kadri. I didn’t expect it to be controversial to say he shouldn’t be in the top 15 TBH. High end number three or low end number two is where I’d slot him.
High end number threes don't put up back to back 30 goal seasons nearly averaging 60 points while playing shutdown minutes. He's probably more along the lines of an ideal #2.
 

snipes

How cold? I’m ice cold.
Dec 28, 2015
55,837
64,376
I disagree with you a lot @zeke but this is well thought out and articulated.

Great work.
 

leaffaninvancouver

formerly in Victoria
Jan 11, 2012
13,819
8,328
Yeah, who cares about such insignificant things as Stanley Cup playoffs? :sarcasm:
Playoffs is the MOST important criteria to judge a player. Everything else matters much, much less. Ask any player, really.

P.S. Winning the Stanley Cup will do marvels for McDavid's standings and legacy. Too bad it's not likely happen any time soon. :confused:

No, it's really not. Players may want to win a cup but who the best player is isn't decided by the playoffs. That's an insane way to judge a player, it's too small of a sample.

I get that the Stanley cup is the goal but a player winning them means nothing when comparing which player is better over the last two years. You're letting emotion cloud numbers.
 

snipes

How cold? I’m ice cold.
Dec 28, 2015
55,837
64,376
ah. yes Draisaitl - I actually didn't include him (or giroux) as centers here. Over the last 2yrs both have played at least half their games on the wing, and achieved by far their most success there.

Drai would come out looking very good in this analysis, no doubt.

Would you mind doing your analysis for Drai and let me know where he falls? Thanks!

Not sure if it's been posted or not just saw this post.
 

Sentinel

Registered User
May 26, 2009
13,233
5,043
New Jersey
www.vvinenglish.com
No, it's really not. Players may want to win a cup but who the best player is isn't decided by the playoffs. That's an insane way to judge a player, it's too small of a sample.

I get that the Stanley cup is the goal but a player winning them means nothing when comparing which player is better over the last two years. You're letting emotion cloud numbers.
No, you don't get it. Stanley Cup is be all, end all. Alex Ovechkin would trade half of his Richards for a Cup. I don't care about sample sizes, and neither do players, coaches, and fans.

Regular season is but a warmup for playoffs. It's long, it's tedious, and it features teams like Buffalo and Arizona. Playoffs matter more. A lot more. This is why Maurice Richard, with his one measly Hart and zero Art Rosses, is routinely named in the Top 10 Best Players of All Time. Because he is considered to be THE best playoff goalscorer in history (although Gretzky and Bossy have something to say about that). Dominic Hasek's six Vezinas and two Harts would be viewed substantially lower if not for that legendary playoff run in 1999 and two Cups, one as a starter. And I can give you a hundred other examples.

Regular season is there so the fans could pay their teams' salaries. Relative quality of players is determined in playoffs.
 

PatriceBergeronFan

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2011
61,561
40,229
USA
High end number threes don't put up back to back 30 goal seasons nearly averaging 60 points while playing shutdown minutes. He's probably more along the lines of an ideal #2.
We will see what he does in the 3rd line role. Perhaps he will score like an elite 3rd line center.
 

leaffaninvancouver

formerly in Victoria
Jan 11, 2012
13,819
8,328
No, you don't get it. Stanley Cup is be all, end all. Alex Ovechkin would trade half of his Richards for a Cup. I don't care about sample sizes, and neither do players, coaches, and fans.

Regular season is but a warmup for playoffs. It's long, it's tedious, and it features teams like Buffalo and Arizona. Playoffs matter more. A lot more. This is why Maurice Richard, with his one measly Hart and zero Art Rosses, is routinely named in the Top 10 Best Players of All Time. Because he is considered to be THE best playoff goalscorer in history (although Gretzky and Bossy have something to say about that). Dominic Hasek's six Vezinas and two Harts would be viewed substantially lower if not for that legendary playoff run in 1999 and two Cups, one as a starter. And I can give you a hundred other examples.

Regular season is there so the fans could pay their teams' salaries. Relative quality of players is determined in playoffs.

You’re welcome to think what you like but Joe Thornton doesn’t magically become a better player if he wins a cup.

The more teams in the league the harder it is to win a cup. Great players will increasingly never win one.
 

Sentinel

Registered User
May 26, 2009
13,233
5,043
New Jersey
www.vvinenglish.com
You’re welcome to think what you like but Joe Thornton doesn’t magically become a better player if he wins a cup.

The more teams in the league the harder it is to win a cup. Great players will increasingly never win one.
Again: Joe Thornton will immediately become, not better, but greater player for winning the Cup. Just like Ovechkin did. In the most people's rankings he immediately jumped from mid-20s to the lower 10s. He is now breathing down Crosby's neck, which was practically unthinkable last year. All for two reasons: winning the Cup and performing in playoffs.

Currently Thornton doesn't make my Top 120 players of all time. If he wins it, he is in. Currently he is in the Top 5 Best players not to win the Cup (after Dionne, Park, and a couple of others). I'm sure it's a huge consolation to him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad