...
Personally... Lidstrom was always overrated. Unpopular, I know.
When some pundits put him right next to Orr as the 2 best D ever, I cringe.
I can't put him ahead of Bourque despite the multiple cups and 2 more Norris trophies.
Lidstrom just played an extremely smart solid game. Not a big hitter, not a big shooter, not the fastest guy, rarely if ever had a highlight reel play. He just didn't have that dynamic ability that a Orr or Bourque brought to the table. Zero flash to his game, just made the right decision probably 99% of the time. Not knocking him but flash wasn't his game.
We know he's no Orr, that's not even debatable.
But when comparing him to Bourque, it's also the first quarter of each guys careers that separate the two.
Bourque was essentially one of the 5 best D in the game from the time he entered the league in 1979, until the day he put the cup over his head in 2001. And he has the 1st/2nd team all-star births to prove it.
Lidstrom didn't really elevate his game to the elite level until about 96 or 97. He didn't get named to the 1st/2nd all-star team until 1998 after entering the league in 1991.
So that career gap to me, and the lack of dynamic ability, separates Bourque and Lidstrom.