If his price tag is a 1st..I’d pass..He would be a luxury to have ,but not a necessity..he’s not a top 4 Dman.
A player requesting a trade doesn’t have any leverage when the team he’s playing for isn’t competitive. If he wants to mail it in or sit out, the Flames would be fine with that. They’ll be in no rush to deal him.
Even more important, he doesn't have trade protection, so he can't limit our options and he's in the final year of his deal so if he mails it in, his bag shrinks and he only f***s himself.
I wonder if Garland at 3.5 mil, a 50 point player not playing PP time, might entice Calgary? He might wake up Huberdeau's game some, he would certainly add to scoring.
That would be terrible asset management. They need to maximize their own return and not do things out of spite.
Way bigger and meaner. The leafs need another McCabe more than they do Klingberg on that roster. Some snarl on the back end would be huge for them.
It’s not out of spite. He was already on the block along with every other UFA on the team. Terrible asset management would be trading him in a panic. The Flames aren’t in win-now mode so they’ll deal him but only when the right trade comes along.
That's not accurate. They made it clear all extension talks were being stopped for the time being.
No, Garland would be of almost zero interest to Calgary. He's had 50 points once and that was from riding shotgun to EP or the Horvat - Miller line. He not a play driver and Calgary is already overflowing with middle 6 talent.If it came down to TO vs Van for Zardorov who has what is would take to make the deal, the best offer.
Now rememeber Big Z contract expires this season.
Both clubs will have cap issues next year too
Presently TO looks to be the solid club making the playoffs for a few years in a row.
Vancouver has Demko.
Calgary needs a fit for Huberdeau and good defence prospects
The Canucks could offer Garland, a 50pt player with retention of 1.5 mil a year with 3 years left on his deal. Include one of three "AA" D prospects and add a later round draft pick, they do have more to offer than TO.
TO's cap issues may come down to choosing between Nylander and Marner and Nylander does play center and would fit nicely with Huberdeau. TO's cap issues may be worse than the Canucks due to clause contracts. Other than Nylander they could offer up injured Liljegren and Timmins but that would hurt their depth. And Nylander is worth too much more than just Zardorov, Calgary would have to add.
Could be a block buster though.
Zardorov, Markstrom/Vladar and for Nylander, if they can get him to waive his clause, Jones and Timmins/? with a pick or a 3 way deal of some sort.
TO still needs a goalie so maybe they go in that direction first. Klinberg for Zardorov? Both expiring at the end of the year but Klinberg also had a clause.
Fun to imagine Zardorov dressing for TO or Vancouver tonight.
I wonder if Garland at 3.5 mil, a 50 point player not playing PP time, might entice Calgary? He might wake up Huberdeau's game some, he would certainly add to scoring.
The Canucks have been trying to trade Garland for like a year now, teams clearly don't want his contract. So I highly doubt Garland would be a main piece in a deal.If it came down to TO vs Van for Zardorov who has what is would take to make the deal, the best offer.
Now rememeber Big Z contract expires this season.
Both clubs will have cap issues next year too
Presently TO looks to be the solid club making the playoffs for a few years in a row.
Vancouver has Demko.
Calgary needs a fit for Huberdeau and good defence prospects
The Canucks could offer Garland, a 50pt player with retention of 1.5 mil a year with 3 years left on his deal. Include one of three "AA" D prospects and add a later round draft pick, they do have more to offer than TO.
TO's cap issues may come down to choosing between Nylander and Marner and Nylander does play center and would fit nicely with Huberdeau. TO's cap issues may be worse than the Canucks due to clause contracts. Other than Nylander they could offer up injured Liljegren and Timmins but that would hurt their depth. And Nylander is worth too much more than just Zardorov, Calgary would have to add.
Could be a block buster though.
Zardorov, Markstrom/Vladar and for Nylander, if they can get him to waive his clause, Jones and Timmins/? with a pick or a 3 way deal of some sort.
TO still needs a goalie so maybe they go in that direction first. Klinberg for Zardorov? Both expiring at the end of the year but Klinberg also had a clause.
Fun to imagine Zardorov dressing for TO or Vancouver tonight.
What kind of offer could you see LA making? With no 2nd, I was struggling to put an idea together.
That’s true but realistically there isn’t much time left to get new deals done. If they’re not talking now, then the odds are they’ll be gone before the deadline.
Good thing you're a Nobody and Nobody cares what u want
Highly doubt LA makes the move. LA management and coaching like the D-core right now even with Englund in the lineup. If he's retained at 50% than it might work but highly doubt LA moves a 1st for 3 straight years (unless it's for an Elite young goalie).
If it came down to TO vs Van for Zardorov who has what is would take to make the deal, the best offer.
Now rememeber Big Z contract expires this season.
Both clubs will have cap issues next year too
Presently TO looks to be the solid club making the playoffs for a few years in a row.
Vancouver has Demko.
Calgary needs a fit for Huberdeau and good defence prospects
The Canucks could offer Garland, a 50pt player with retention of 1.5 mil a year with 3 years left on his deal. Include one of three "AA" D prospects and add a later round draft pick, they do have more to offer than TO.
TO's cap issues may come down to choosing between Nylander and Marner and Nylander does play center and would fit nicely with Huberdeau. TO's cap issues may be worse than the Canucks due to clause contracts. Other than Nylander they could offer up injured Liljegren and Timmins but that would hurt their depth. And Nylander is worth too much more than just Zardorov, Calgary would have to add.
Could be a block buster though.
Zardorov, Markstrom/Vladar and for Nylander, if they can get him to waive his clause, Jones and Timmins/? with a pick or a 3 way deal of some sort.
TO still needs a goalie so maybe they go in that direction first. Klinberg for Zardorov? Both expiring at the end of the year but Klinberg also had a clause.
Fun to imagine Zardorov dressing for TO or Vancouver tonight.
I wonder if Garland at 3.5 mil, a 50 point player not playing PP time, might entice Calgary? He might wake up Huberdeau's game some, he would certainly add to scoring.
If it came down to TO vs Van for Zardorov who has what is would take to make the deal, the best offer.
Now rememeber Big Z contract expires this season.
Both clubs will have cap issues next year too
Presently TO looks to be the solid club making the playoffs for a few years in a row.
Vancouver has Demko.
Calgary needs a fit for Huberdeau and good defence prospects
The Canucks could offer Garland, a 50pt player with retention of 1.5 mil a year with 3 years left on his deal. Include one of three "AA" D prospects and add a later round draft pick, they do have more to offer than TO.
TO's cap issues may come down to choosing between Nylander and Marner and Nylander does play center and would fit nicely with Huberdeau. TO's cap issues may be worse than the Canucks due to clause contracts. Other than Nylander they could offer up injured Liljegren and Timmins but that would hurt their depth. And Nylander is worth too much more than just Zardorov, Calgary would have to add.
Could be a block buster though.
Zardorov, Markstrom/Vladar and for Nylander, if they can get him to waive his clause, Jones and Timmins/? with a pick or a 3 way deal of some sort.
TO still needs a goalie so maybe they go in that direction first. Klinberg for Zardorov? Both expiring at the end of the year but Klinberg also had a clause.
Fun to imagine Zardorov dressing for TO or Vancouver tonight.
I wonder if Garland at 3.5 mil, a 50 point player not playing PP time, might entice Calgary? He might wake up Huberdeau's game some, he would certainly add to scoring.
