Steve Yzerlland
Registered User
- Jul 18, 2018
- 9,140
- 4,717
So between Zadina and Vrana we will get a conditional 7th round pick. How could it get worse than this?
Pretty sure the OG on this front was Ilya Kovalchuk. He signed a 17 year deal with New Jersey and then "retired" three years later only to return to the NHL after 5 years in the KHL. That 17 year contract was terminated and just went away.Since when have teams and their players been able to "mutually agree to terminate a contract" with no penalty for the team or player and what prevents other players in different scenarios (injury, retirement, performance) from doing the same? I though all contracts in the NHL were guaranteed?
So between Zadina and Vrana we will get a conditional 7th round pick. How could it get worse than this?
Luongo agreed his contract sucked... But HE still wanted the money.Since when have teams and their players been able to "mutually agree to terminate a contract" with no penalty for the team or player and what prevents other players in different scenarios (injury, retirement, performance) from doing the same? I though all contracts in the NHL were guaranteed?
To be fair, it’s more like being the manager at a high-end restaurant making very good money. They want to demote you to fry cook but you’ll still be making much more than you would anywhere else. Then you get offered a role as a manager at a lower end place, where you’ll be making less money than you do as a fry cook at your current employer, in the (let’s be honest here, dim) hopes you can get your way back to high-end manager.
So you are saying that the Redwings are the high end restaurant and other NHL teams are lower end places?
You were comparing his contract with the Wings with his potential contract on another team as being equivalent. Burger King manager = McDonald’s manager. But that’s not the case, the situations are completely different. It’s not a matter of going from one position to an equal position elsewhere. He’ll be taking a big pay cut wherever he ends up, and if he’s not able to hack it he may well be out of the league entirely.So you are saying that the Redwings are the high end restaurant and other NHL teams are lower end places?
Vrana was underperforming on the red wings? And where is it verified either of them was "toxic"? Excuse me, what?It would be worse keeping two toxic/underperforming players in the organization. Removing them and moving on is forward progress.
If the contract termination goes through, there’s really only two possibilities here. 1) He succeeds on his 1yr contract and is able to secure another bag; or 2) he continues on the trajectory he’s been on, and is playing in Europe the following season, having missed out on the majority of what was ultimately the biggest contract of his career. Given what we’ve seen so far from him, which scenario seems more likely to you?
If this decision to terminate came out of a discussion regarding Zadina's intention to not report to the AHL if assigned, I think that would swing it to article 14 of the SPC rather than article 13. 14, the player just gets paid what was due up to the point of the contract termination. Article 13 basically just outlines the buyout process.My understanding is that even if you mutually agree to terminate a contract, there is still a buyout attached to that. For players under 26yo it is 1/3 of the remaining contract. Zadina is still owed $4.56M on a one-way contract, so by agreeing to terminate the contract, he is actually forgoing $3.04M (regardless if he were to play in Detroit or GR).
That is a ton of money for a guy who every NHL team looked at and said, "do not want." Whatever path he takes from here, I can't imagine he ever recoups that amount.
14. (b) would cover refusal to report to wherever he's assigned.14. The Club may also terminate this SPC upon written notice to the Player (but only after obtaining Waivers from all other Clubs) if the Player shall at any time:
(a) fail, refuse, or neglect to obey the Club's rules governing training and conduct of Players, if such failure, refusal or neglect should constitute a material breach of this SPC. 319 EXHIBIT 1
(b) fail, refuse or neglect to render his services hereunder or in any other manner materially breach this SPC.
In the event of termination under Paragraph 14(a) or (b) the Player shall only be entitled to compensation due to him to the earlier of the date such notice is personally delivered to him or the date such notice is e-mailed to him.
Ah, makes sense. So he would be forgoing the entire $4.56M in that case. Wow.If this decision to terminate came out of a discussion regarding Zadina's intention to not report to the AHL if assigned, I think that would swing it to article 14 of the SPC rather than article 13. 14, the player just gets paid what was due up to the point of the contract termination. Article 13 basically just outlines the buyout process.
14. (b) would cover refusal to report to wherever he's assigned.
Incredibly ballsy move.Ah, makes sense. So he would be forgoing the entire $4.56M in that case. Wow.
This has Holland written all over it.He MIGHT still make the NHL somewhere.
As I said, Ballsy move.
Will he get a PTO, 2-way deal, or 1 way deal in Anaheim / Montreal / Chicago???
If he's refusing to go to the AHL here, why would he sign a two-way deal with another club?