RoyalOverNavy
Registered User
- Feb 25, 2023
- 86
- 158
Zach with a hat trick tonight.
Wenatchee 4, Everett 3
Is Zach likely to come East for the Prospects Challenge?
Wenatchee 4, Everett 3
Is Zach likely to come East for the Prospects Challenge?
He’s coming, yesZach with a hat trick tonight.
Wenatchee 4, Everett 3
Is Zach likely to come East for the Prospects Challenge?
Are you meaning the following season? Surely not this season.It won't matter, because Benson is making the NHL next season.
(Quote from Lance's The Buffalo News article that was listed in the Savoie thread)Every player was credited for the 2020-21 season, even though the WHL played a limited schedule in a bubble because of the Covid-19 pandemic
(Quote from Lance's The Buffalo News article that was listed in the Savoie thread)
Seems like this means that Benson already has 3 accrued seasons.
Zach Benson - Stats, Contract, Salary & More
Eliteprospects.com hockey player profile of Zach Benson, 2005-05-12 Langley, BC, CAN Canada. Most recently in the undefined with Buffalo Sabres. Complete player biography and stats.www.eliteprospects.com
20-21 - 24 GP
21-22 - 73 GP
22-23 - 75 GP
In Lance's article, he said everyone got credit for the 20-21 season. So, yes, it would seem like Benson is on track to get his 4th season in 23-24 and then be eligible to play in the AHL in 24-25 IF he isn't on the Sabres roster.Benson didn't miss a game in the COVID-shortened year. I'd like to think that the WHL would give an accrued season to guys who played the entire year.
Seems like Benson has a real strong case that he could go to the AHL next year.
It won't matter, because Benson is making the NHL next season.
Not sure anyone would disagree with him making roster in 2024.Yes that’s is correct .
Benson will 200% be on the roster next season
Care to give odds on that 200% likelihood? I might be interested in the other side.Yes that’s is correct .
Benson will 200% be on the roster next season
Not sure anyone would disagree with him making roster in 2024.
Care to give odds on that 200% likelihood? I might be interested in the other side.
If they let all the UFA walk and resign the RFAs that's already 10 bodies for the forwards so its not an issue.I would like to reiterate the problem If Kulich and or Savoie don’t make the nhl this year. Along with Benson who is the best of the bunch and Rosen who will be the oldest and have two years of AHL already…
how many rookies are you going to break in in 24/25? 4? At forward alone? Is it another development year?
If your answer is they’ll trade away ELC contract or two for proven player…A: that’s hilarious. B: they should have done it already
Adams will need to switch from "not blocking the prospects" to the Detroit model of the 90's - overcooking them in the AHL.I would like to reiterate the problem If Kulich and or Savoie don’t make the nhl this year. Along with Benson who is the best of the bunch and Rosen who will be the oldest and have two years of AHL already…
how many rookies are you going to break in in 24/25? 4? At forward alone? Is it another development year?
If your answer is they’ll trade away ELC contract or two for proven player…A: that’s hilarious. B: they should have done it already
He’s taking the Cozens express trainYes that’s is correct .
Benson will 200% be on the roster next season
Also, why are you worried now?I would like to reiterate the problem If Kulich and or Savoie don’t make the nhl this year. Along with Benson who is the best of the bunch and Rosen who will be the oldest and have two years of AHL already…
how many rookies are you going to break in in 24/25? 4? At forward alone? Is it another development year?
If your answer is they’ll trade away ELC contract or two for proven player…A: that’s hilarious. B: they should have done it already
I would like to reiterate the problem If Kulich and or Savoie don’t make the nhl this year. Along with Benson who is the best of the bunch and Rosen who will be the oldest and have two years of AHL already…
how many rookies are you going to break in in 24/25? 4? At forward alone? Is it another development year?
If your answer is they’ll trade away ELC contract or two for proven player…A: that’s hilarious. B: they should have done it already
This is what we're going to see and it's why I'm not so sure that Benson "200%" makes the team out of camp next year. I think Adams wants to establish the "well-done" prospect model, out of both numbers-based necessity and developmental philosophy. Also, the pro experience gained by these guys in Roch should help allay concerns of breaking in multiple rookies at once.Adams will need to switch from "not blocking the prospects" to the Detroit model of the 90's - overcooking them in the AHL.