So...I haven't been paying much attention to the GDT lately (though I did see the game and I'm still euphoric after seeing JBITBPITNHL have himself a night).
But did everyone agree with the 3 stars of the game?
I mean...don't get me wrong : Markstrom was solid in net last night but....I don't know about him being 1st star.
I would've given the 3 stars (in order) to :
1.) Bratt
2.) Markstrom
3.) Hughes (Jack)
I wouldn't say Bratt's deal was team-friendly (had he been signed to pennies-to-the-dollar before he blew up, THAT would've been a team-friendly deal) but regardless, he's currently earning (and is worth) every penny.We are incredibly lucky to have all three of them playing such high level games, and all on team friendly deals too.
I can go with that but man...that deflected-pass to Bratt for his first goal of the night was just bonkers.Bratt, Noesen, Hamilton (no particular order)
That's what I'd like to know.?????????????????????????? how the hell is markstrom 1st star rofl
That's what I'd like to know.
It was his 500th game. Everyone wore t-shirts.
So we're celebrating a player's Longevity in his position instead of the impact he has on last night's game?
I mean...I thought the 3 stars of the game were the players who had the most impact?
And while Markstrom was strong, no way he had more of an impact than Bratt (or even Jack, for that matter).
Hell, an argument can be made that Markstrom doesn't even belong on that list but instead it would be like your list.
They could've just put a graphic at the JumboTron or something celebrating Markstrom's 500 game instead of giving him a spot on the Top 3. meh.
You missed my ninja edit.They, meaning the team, did put it on Jumbotron and it got coverage.
Media in attendance picks the stars.
They may have simply wanted him to have the on-ice interview and to get to be in the spotlight.
Not sure people care a whole lot about Stars of the Game.