Actually that's wrong:
MLB Rule 6.03 (a) (3):
"If the batter is standing in the batter's box and he or his bat is struck by the catcher's throw back to the pitcher, and, in the umpire's judgment, there is no intent on the part of the batter to interfere with the throw, the ball is alive and in play.''
Any intent to deflect the ball by the batter would be a dead play
The funny thing is, if Jays aren't playing a shift, the errant throw is right at Donaldson and Odor doesn't even take a step towards home.
It was literally a perfect storm
and the KC trolls have been unleashed
Exactly.
If you can't hit the ball being pitched to you ... take another swipe at it as the catcher throws it back. Smart move ... just like Choo shrewdly did.
The correct call is to give Choo a warning for intentionally interfering with the ball and that further rule violations could result in his ejection.
well i am not saying go out there, and swing at everything. but at the same time, wouldn't taking a more. more patient approach (because for games 1-2, and a part of game 5), the Jays weren't patient at all. and I know a complaint has been especially if we don't go all "Blue Jay" - that we swing for home runs, not for base hits.
in my mind, wouldn't that help? but apparently not, so my apologises for having a different chain of thought.
Lol give me a break. As if every fan base of every sport in the world doesn't have moronic keyboard warriors.
and the KC trolls have been unleashed
small ?The small concern I have is batters now going out of their way to try and utilize their batter's box space.
or his sleeve.Strictly hypothetical, but I'm curious to know what kind of ruling would be made if instead of the bat, Martin struck Choo in the helmet.
well i am not saying go out there, and swing at everything. but at the same time, wouldn't taking a more. more patient approach (because for games 1-2, and a part of game 5), the Jays weren't patient at all. and I know a complaint has been especially if we don't go all "Blue Jay" - that we swing for home runs, not for base hits.
in my mind, wouldn't that help? but apparently not, so my apologises for having a different chain of thought.
Don't get angry guys, just laugh. It was only just last year during their playoff run that Yost was pleading the public to come out to games. How quickly people forget.
Wow. i think a lot of us back in July were all like "Please lets face KC in the ALCS" heh. so watching some reports, it seems like while KC doesn't homer a lot - they are really good at manufacturing the run, which means, it seems like to me, we have to match that, and not go for the homer all the time.
and their bullpen is v. v. good, so basically we have to really get to the starter pitcher early and often, right? is there anything else, we (and by we, I mean, me) need to know about KC? it's probably going to be a tougher, right?
The whole "Blue Jays" swing for the fences thing is a myth. They have a bunch of guys who look to make hard contact and are patient enough to take walks.
Swing for the fences is usually characterized by big lengthy uncontrolled swings contrasted with high SO rates. Jays have the best batting avg on pitches 97+mph. This all or nothing mentality is perpetuated by dumb American announcers who haven't watched the team, and notice that they hit lots of homers and rarely play for the single run.
Prove it.There is no ****ing way Choo interfered intentionally lol
The whole "Blue Jays" swing for the fences thing is a myth. They have a bunch of guys who look to make hard contact and are patient enough to take walks.
Swing for the fences is usually characterized by big lengthy uncontrolled swings contrasted with high SO rates. Jays have the best batting avg on pitches 97+mph. This all or nothing mentality is perpetuated by dumb American announcers who haven't watched the team, and notice that they hit lots of homers and rarely play for the single run.
The Jays are an elite offensive team not only because they take walks and hit for power, but because they have one of the league’s lowest K rates, second only to Kansas City’s among playoff teams. Most teams known for their power and patience have the decency to strike out sometimes, since hitters who do well in those areas also tend to swing hard and get into deep counts. The Blue Jays are one of only 35 non-strike-season teams from baseball’s expansion era (1961–2015) to post a walk rate and an Isolated Power at least 15 percent higher than the MLB average. Of those 35 teams, only two (the 1985 and 2009 Yankees) struck out less often relative to their leagues than the Jays did this season. And neither of those two teams was quite Toronto’s equal in the patience or power departments.
I said I wasn't disagreeing with you but that angle paints a different picture than the one that the overhead does.Do you have any photos of that?
All the evidence says it's not interference. Even if Choo stuck out his bat intentionally to deflect the ball, it would still be a legal play if he kept it inside the batter's box.
Don't get angry guys, just laugh. It was only just last year during their playoff run that Yost was pleading the public to come out to games. How quickly people forget.
and the KC trolls have been unleashed
The whole "Blue Jays" swing for the fences thing is a myth. They have a bunch of guys who look to make hard contact and are patient enough to take walks.
Swing for the fences is usually characterized by big lengthy uncontrolled swings contrasted with high SO rates. Jays have the best batting avg on pitches 97+mph. This all or nothing mentality is perpetuated by dumb American announcers who haven't watched the team, and notice that they hit lots of homers and rarely play for the single run.
No need to apologize, it's just a discussion. The Jays swing for homeruns because they're power hitters, but they're one of the most patient teams in the league. If anything, you would think the Royals would try to hit the Jays' way, since the Jays have a vastly superior offense. Realistically, though, both teams should be trying to play to their strengths rather than doing something the other team succeeds at, if that makes sense.
Getting a little parallax from the angle there, the behind the plate angle shows how far over the plate the bat was, not disagreeing with you totally but it was definitely encroaching over the plate.
Because you have been wrong 4 thousand times ... doesnt make it right.
GET THE **** away ... so the catcher can throw the ball back.
Are you serious ?
The game should be delayed ... so the catcher waits until he has the chance to throw the ball back ... because the a$$ of a players is preventing a throw back to the plate.
He should be called for unsportsmanlike behaviour.
GET real.
On a side note: No offense to you. THE RULE NEEDS CHANGING.