Blender
Registered User
- Dec 2, 2009
- 53,292
- 47,189
That one is probably more dangerous than the first one he got a penalty for.
There's a reason no one drafts goalies in the NHL who are under like 6'3. lolRousseau is crap.
Have you ever been on skates Bud?Yo, how did he fall ? He was barely touched.
He was 12 feet from the boards. It shouldn't be dangerous.That is a chicken shit dangerous play….
Cross check to his back when he was already flying towards the puck. Knocked him off balance & then into the boards.Yo, how did he fall ? He was barely touched.
Yes.Have you ever been on skates Bud?
You said it's a perfect hit in North America and thus it couldn't be taught better. I'm saying North American hockey should put more emphasis on protecting the head, so it can be taught better.Conor Geekie is a North American player who will likely play his entire career in North America. It is understandable that he did that considering it was what he was taught to do and what he will need to do every single game to have success in his career.
No one is saying it should be fine for the rest of the world, I agreed it's a penalty under IIHF rules - not sure who you are responding to with most of your post??
Yes. Taught by Alan LetangIs Rehkopf in special education classes?
You said it's a perfect hit in North America and thus it couldn't be taught better. I'm saying North American hockey should put more emphasis on protecting the head, so it can be taught better.
they do, but that one was fine. But we just saw a very dangerous cross check that didn’t even get a review.You said it's a perfect hit in North America and thus it couldn't be taught better. I'm saying North American hockey should put more emphasis on protecting the head, so it can be taught better.