Poitras put himself in a suicidal position there, he could have gotten paralyzed.
Looks like there are a few empty seats for him to sit in.lol
He's looked good. I think he'd thrive with more ice time.Maybe I’m just a homer but Danielson should probably also get some better minutes. Looks somewhat dangerous.
A toast to Simo Häyhä.You know, you guys are the nicest of nations - my best friend is from Winnipeg, poor guyIntroduced me to the Weakerthans
But when it comes to hockey so many of you are arrogant bullies, I guess we are similar about our Winter War etc. No-one is perfect!
![]()
Those shins would probably explode trying to carry groceries in.Jagger Firkus should put some socks on. Even if he has Moves Like Jagger.
IIHF makes sense. Better for the player to think twice about making an unnecessary hit like that if he thinks it might go wrong. The NHL, of course, doesn't give a shit if a player is injured or killed.o dog making sense for one
Why would they not want that hit?That was a beautiful hit by Geekie and doesn’t get called as a penalty in North American hockey.
I loved that hit but the IIHF is consistent in how they call those hits.
Loved the way we opened physically and I want Geekie to bring that physicality all day long going forward.
Still haven’t seen us really get a heavy forecheck going which concerns me in the knockout rounds, this team isn’t skilled enough to play a perimeter game against the Swedes and Americans.
If you criticize the officials? Look out.IIHF makes sense. Better for the player to think twice about making an unnecessary hit like that if he thinks it might go wrong. The NHL, of course, doesn't give a shit if a player is injured or killed.
And I'm saying that better hits are hits that don't involve hitting the head. He went for the big, explosive hit to set the tone.Your post I was replying to was about expecting players to make better hits.
I was just saying that hit was perfect in North America so it couldn't be taught any better.
For a one time tournament, it's completely understandable that a player wouldn't want to change his game away from what would be considered ideal in North America.
IIHF should just adopt the women's hockey rulebook for the men as well. No contact at all. I assume you would love that.IIHF makes sense. Better for the player to think twice about making an unnecessary hit like that if he thinks it might go wrong. The NHL, of course, doesn't give a shit if a player is injured or killed.
And I'm saying that better hits are hits that don't involve hitting the head. He went for the big, explosive hit to set the tone.
Pretty egocentric to think that just because it's perfect for our standards, it means the rest of the world is wrong for not adapting to it. Frankly, I love big hits. I loved the Geekie hit when I first saw it. But when the replay shows head contact, I can't like it.
And sure, it's his prerogative not to want to change his game for a one-time tournament. It's also the IIHF's right to kick the player out of the game when they don't adjust.
Another worthless post. You can make a hit without blowing a player up.IIHF should just adopt the women's hockey rulebook for the men as well. No contact at all. I assume you would love that.
It's a penalty in the entire world. It should be 5 but in the NHL run by scum it would likely be 2.Conor Geekie is a North American player who will likely play his entire career in North America. It is understandable that he did that considering it was what he was taught to do and what he will need to do every single game to have success in his career.
No one is saying it should be fine for the rest of the world, I agreed it's a penalty under IIHF rules - not sure who you are responding to with most of your post??
You're right. Let me stop posting and go fetch you your soy latte. Brb.Another worthless post. You can make a hit without blowing a player up.
How many players have been killed with an open ice hit?IIHF makes sense. Better for the player to think twice about making an unnecessary hit like that if he thinks it might go wrong. The NHL, of course, doesn't give a shit if a player is injured or killed.
IIHF makes no f***ing sense.IIHF makes sense. Better for the player to think twice about making an unnecessary hit like that if he thinks it might go wrong. The NHL, of course, doesn't give a shit if a player is injured or killed.
It is 100% not, very obviously not.It's a penalty in the entire world. It should be 5 but in the NHL run by scum it would likely be 2.
Hockey is Canadian, if the clowns in Switzerland at the IIHF want to make it bandy they should go play bandy instead. In western Canada that’s a textbook hitIIHF makes sense. Better for the player to think twice about making an unnecessary hit like that if he thinks it might go wrong. The NHL, of course, doesn't give a shit if a player is injured or killed.
Bill Masterton for one. I believe it was considered a clean hit though.How many players have been killed with an open ice hit?
Maybe I'm a homer too, but he's showing us here exactly what he showed us in Detroit during preseason. Steps up at bigger stages.Maybe I’m just a homer but Danielson should probably also get some better minutes. Looks somewhat dangerous.
He could gave easily taken the hit. They're not taught to take hits and think puck possession is paramount in all situations.Poitras put himself in a suicidal position there, he could have gotten paralyzed.
Did you watch the intermission????? McKenzie said that initial head contact is at least 2 minute penalty in the NHL. There is NO leeway.It is 100% not, very obviously not.
You might want to watch a few more NHL games.