CantLoseWithMatthews
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2015
- 49,735
- 59,494
It's nothing new.The fact that the hit on Beck was determined not to be a penalty and the Geekie hit was a major is really everything wrong with the way the international game is called in a nutshell.
That is not true.Such lack of class from the Canadians here
You would assume wrong and that’s not the rule.Not on the Geekie call. I would assume even in the NHL that there is no leeway in the call if the initial point of contact is the head.
Get over yourself, lol.Such lack of class from the Canadians here
Wait a second, why isn't the good ole canadian kid getting up.
Nope, it’s ok if they hit a Canadian headHahaha. Wonder if this'll be 5.
It was a rhetorical question lolNope, it’s ok if they hit a Canadian head
They should both be in the stands eating nachos.That should be 5 & a game too.
Inconsistent reffing here.
Then perhaps NA hockey is just outdated and stupid, as opposed to European hockey being soft?That was a perfectly clean hit in any NA league above Novice, that is exactly soft.
You missed a part - the head was hit. That's literal textbook in IIHF rules.That hit was literal textbook in North America. Other than not hitting at all, there was absolutely nothing that could've been better there.
Lane was good, tucked in his elbow, didn't launch upwards, etc.
Hip check. Or go back to the play since the puck was already moved.Please explain to me how Geekie could have executed a "better" hit in that scenario without saying "don't lay the hit at all". Because if that's your argument, we might as well make hockey a non-contact sport. lol