Pavel Buchnevich
"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Would you compare him so to JVR?
No, I don't think he'll be that good.
Would you compare him so to JVR?
Well said. Speed is merely a component of skating.
"Skating" is the full package.
Funny, I can’t say I’ve ever had a single concern about Kravtsov’s skating.
Right now he kind of looks like a crane out there, but he covers a lot of ground and has a very effortless, smooth stride.
I don’t think he’s a blow by defenseman type so much as he smoothly glides around people and then pushes forward in bursts when he gets to openings.
If anything he makes it look so easy that it appears he isn’t even trying — though he is.
Sometimes I feel like we’ve become so fixated on “skating” that we wrongly visualize the concept as exclusively referring to “speed.”
In reality, it’s about mobility and agility and turning. It’s about being able to maneuver and remain in control of a situation.
I’m that regard, Kravtsov is just fine.
I think strength is one of the areas he needs to focus on, because that’s a big reason he’s getting pushed off pucks. If he can add strengths, eventually 20-25 pounds, and maintain the mobility, that will be an strong combination.
Bingo.
He does lack strength, but he's still a teenager who needs to fill out his frame.
When you actually do look at his skating, he has a beautiful, effortless stride. He already can create separation with what power he has right now against pros.
He'll be even faster as he trains for a few off seasons and fills out his frame.
If anyone still doesn't believe that there's an NA and especially a Canadian bias with these networks watch Liam Foudy's analysis. This is a guy that's roundly believed to be a huge reach by Columbus, a 2nd round type player. But he's a good ole Canadian boy so it's nothing but praise. Then go back to one of the video of Kravtsov being drafted. **** these nationalistic *******s sideways.
he looks like Kuznetsov, skates like kuznetsov (that strange smooth style when he gain speed without visible moves) but overall Kuznetsov have better posession skills and vision. This young kid just play different - more agressive and paceIs he really similar to Kuznetsov or is that a lazy comparison by Clark due to nationality and team?
I've been saying all season, and really back to last season, that Wahlstrom was overrated. The guy can really shoot the puck, but the rest of his game is rough.
He's not even that good of a goal scorer. He's not Ovechkin, not Laine. He could be a 30-35 goal guy in the NHL, but I'm also not sure he has enough else to his game to not be like a Pirri type who shoots really well, but does nothing else at an NHL level.
If anyone still doesn't believe that there's an NA and especially a Canadian bias with these networks watch Liam Foudy's analysis. This is a guy that's roundly believed to be a huge reach by Columbus, a 2nd round type player. But he's a good ole Canadian boy so it's nothing but praise. Then go back to one of the video of Kravtsov being drafted. **** these nationalistic *******s sideways.
Funny, I can’t say I’ve ever had a single concern about Kravtsov’s skating.
Right now he kind of looks like a crane out there, but he covers a lot of ground and has a very effortless, smooth stride.
I don’t think he’s a blow by defenseman type so much as he smoothly glides around people and then pushes forward in bursts when he gets to openings.
If anything he makes it look so easy that it appears he isn’t even trying — though he is.
Sometimes I feel like we’ve become so fixated on “skating” that we wrongly visualize the concept as exclusively referring to “speed.”
In reality, it’s about mobility and agility and turning. It’s about being able to maneuver and remain in control of a situation.
I’m that regard, Kravtsov is just fine.
I think strength is one of the areas he needs to focus on, because that’s a big reason he’s getting pushed off pucks. If he can add strengths, eventually 20-25 pounds, and maintain the mobility, that will be an strong combination.
If anyone still doesn't believe that there's an NA and especially a Canadian bias with these networks watch Liam Foudy's analysis. This is a guy that's roundly believed to be a huge reach by Columbus, a 2nd round type player. But he's a good ole Canadian boy so it's nothing but praise. Then go back to one of the video of Kravtsov being drafted. **** these nationalistic *******s sideways.
Gretzky remains the ultimate example of a great skater without great speed.
You hear so many stories of coaches yelling at players to hit or contain Gretzky because it doesn't look like it would be complicated and players emphatically responding that they'd love to if they could catch him.
It's funny, just the other day I was thinking about how our board has a mix of North American and European posters and both tend to gravitate toward players who come from closer to home.
I think there's a location bias, even unintentionally, because we tend to be more familiar with the players to whom we have somewhat regular access.
Even Bob McKenzie's list tends to favor North American kids. Not because he doesn't like or value European players, but because his access to North American scouts is likely to be significantly better than his access to European scouts.
I think there's also a perception, albeit one that is changing, that North American kids are more likely to settle into supporting roles if they don't become stars. In contrast, there's the perception that it's a little more "all or nothing" with many European prospects. If they're not NHL ready, they're going back home. If the skills don't translate, they aren't as likely to find a different role.
I am always surprised, and very skeptical when people living in the US/Canada claim to watch regular European hockey because those games are played at 1 PM EST most of the time. The only way you can watch those games is if you are unemployed.
I never claim to know the NA prospects because I honestly don't watch enough aside from WHL (as a Thunderbirds fan). That's why my picks are usually the European prospects because those I have actually seen in action.
I am always surprised, and very skeptical when people living in the US/Canada claim to watch regular European hockey because those games are played at 1 PM EST most of the time. The only way you can watch those games is if you are unemployed.
I never claim to know the NA prospects because I honestly don't watch enough aside from WHL (as a Thunderbirds fan). That's why my picks are usually the European prospects because those I have actually seen in action.
Kids playing the NHL develop too. Sometimes they come here, develop further and go back to Europe.disagree.
kids playing with men in europe are developing. period.
they develop in the K, SEL, extra liga, etc and they come here.
question is where should they be ? there or here. more and more players are staying there and the coming here after they are "developed".
either way they are developing, and thus that league they are playing in is a developmental feeder for the nhl.
end of that story.
Lunch break is around 1 pm, plus new sports channels in US broadcast lots of Euro sports. DVR to the rescue. Last year there was a lot of KHL and SHL games on.
I found a list. Elite Prospects - AHL Stats All-time season
Of recent players, the list is filled with mostly busts, except for Anisimov and Voynov.
Yes. And that's true. But I was referring to people who claim to watch every prospect out there. To do that, you have to watch 7-8 games a day.
I just try to follow Rangers prospects or someone who’s been linked to NYR.