He's quite a faller and usually that doesn't work out. I think he could be a safe pick and be a solid 3rd liner, but the upside doesn't look there anymore. Still see him as a late 1st for now, but way too high to take him at the Pens pick imo.
is it him or the team he's playing for? i think he's better than his numbers.
Dvorský is interesting. There's lots of speculation here about where he's going to get picked. But while he's big and decently talented, a lot of people look at Slafkovský's struggles in Montreal and think Dvorský's will be even worse.
I’d probably expect he might fall to the second, which if we had a pick there still might have been a good choice.
Way too early to even judge Slafkovsky. I personally didn't have him as my #1, but nobody in that class has really proven a ton yet.Dvorský is interesting. There's lots of speculation here about where he's going to get picked. But while he's big and decently talented, a lot of people look at Slafkovský's struggles in Montreal and think Dvorský's will be even worse.
Oshawa's not a terrible team. There's players on worse teams putting up better numbers.
i agree with yager being gone, ....and give you a maybe on dvorsky but i like ritchie a little better than you. i saw him bouncing passes off his teammates sticks in the "small sample" size that i saw. but it was small so if you saw more than i did I'll yield to you.
That Skinner deal isn't so bad now with his last two seasons.
Indeed. That’s why I’m wondering if they would take on Granlund since they made it through the bad part of the Skinner deal.
I mean Danielson lead his team in points and his team didn't even make the playoffs. And his production was better than Ritchie. So a weaker team isn't really giving Ritchie much of an excuse.
