CantLoseWithMatthews
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2015
- 49,735
- 59,495
Why can this pathetic team never go a game without preventing the other team from getting a scoring chance ?DID YOU NOT SEE MUZZIN GIVE UP THE PUCK? BAD DEFENSE
Why can this pathetic team never go a game without preventing the other team from getting a scoring chance ?DID YOU NOT SEE MUZZIN GIVE UP THE PUCK? BAD DEFENSE
for us oldtimers in this forum we remember Grant Fuhr. Oilers were so all offence they would win games 7-6 6-4, 8-6 but what Fuhr did was make that key save when the Oilers came back and took a lead or shut things down in the 3rd. He gave up 4 but never that back breaking goal.Just want to clarify, it’s not Andersen’s fault. But my issue is that we never get a timely save from him. That is what I believe is holding him back from being an elite goaltender. He doesn’t make key saves in big moments. All the best goaltenders do, it just seems like Freddy never does.
There is a difference between what you say and what others say. This I agree with and it does hold him back, goalies like vasy, rask and others will make the huge saves no one expected and Andersen can’t make those. But saying he 100% should’ve had that is just not right, that was a 40g scoring winner walking down the slot open with a crisp passJust want to clarify, it’s not Andersen’s fault. But my issue is that we never get a timely save from him. That is what I believe is holding him back from being an elite goaltender. He doesn’t make key saves in big moments. All the best goaltenders do, it just seems like Freddy never does.
Our second goal went riggt threw Helleybuck as well.So yea, he got open and a shot in close... Half posters say you cant blame Freddy.. fine... But look at the saves Murray and Helle make to keep their team in the game !! Campbell monster saves when we broke down.
Timely saves are so important to maintaining momentum..no way should this be a 1 goal game. Frustrating that Freddy has a knack for giving up goals at the worst possible times.
So basically what your saying is, don’t do anything there. Run Matthews, don’t do anything.
Wrong.
13 high danger scoring chances to 1. two of our high danger chances went in out of 13. One out of one for them.Leafs, 32 shots, 2 goals.
Jets, 16 shots, 1 goal.
The stats say Andersen is matching the vezina winner in SV%.
I'm by no means an "Andersen guy" but tonight isn't the night to pile on him after two.
Pump up what rivalry? lol
Nice try panel, there's no rivalry anymore.
Why can this pathetic team never go a game without preventing the other team from getting a scoring chance ?
Pump up what rivalry? lol
Nice try panel, there's no rivalry anymore.
I just posted and said the entire shift was a disaster and can't be blamed on Andersen...
But I'm starting to reconsider.
What's frustrated me is that the leafs have dominated play like that all game against Winnipeg. The leafs have taken dozens of shots like that.
Then one mix up, Winnipeg has one... just one dominating shift (that the leafs have had ALL game) and they immediately just take one shot and score.
Do the leafs have a goalie problem or a "finish" problem? I'm not so sure anymore.
Are you upset that people are being rational and giving Campbell more then 3 periods to jump on him?How about that stutzle goal, that seemed like a bad goal, and no one talks about it huh...
Exactly. When aren't we?
When's the last time we had a great goalie?
I haven't seen anything that Helleybuck has saved that he shouldn't have. Have you?13 high danger scoring chances to 1. two of our high danger chances went in out of 13. One out of one for them.
It has nothing to do with them not being able to make mistakes. Know who is on the ice. Your up 2 buzz late in the period and you’re on the ice against a top 10 line in the NHL. High and hard muzzWhy can this pathetic team never go a game without preventing the other team from getting a scoring chance ?
Thought so and it makes sense to measure and quantify with a larger sample, but I have trouble suggesting that puck goes in 6% of the time.Yeah it's about where the shot was taken from.
I haven't seen anything that Helleybuck has saved that he shouldn't have. Have you?
Elite goalies are not easy to acquire; second a lot of teams have gone on to win the cup with good goalies (not elite goalies). You dont need a vezina goalie to go deep in the playoffs.
You need good defensive structure and timely goals on the opposition
If the leafs get 13 high danger scoring chances and control play the entire game support, but still don't have any "good shots", then that's a whole other problem.I haven't seen anything that Helleybuck has saved that he shouldn't have. Have you?
I get it...but that is never the time to just let it go.What I'm saying is be smart about it because that could have been the difference between 2-1 and 3-1 and that's HUGE
Wait what does this even mean? I’m saying that just because one goalie who is OUR goalie let’s in a goal, doesn’t mean we have to pile on the hate, whilst another of our goalies let in a goal and we don’t say anything. And if the excuse is that we won that game, then Sit around and wait for the game to end before talking about timely goalsAre you upset that people are being rational and giving Campbell more then 3 periods to jump on him?
On Mikheyev?? Really?There have been a couple that he's saved that Andersen probably wouldn't. Like the short handed breakaway.
Is it possible our snipers are not as good as some think and neither are some of the goalies that are stoning them ?If the leafs get 13 high danger scoring chances and control play the entire game support, but still don't have any "good shots", then that's a whole other problem.