CantLoseWithMatthews
Registered User
- Sep 28, 2015
- 49,735
- 59,495
Breakaways are good scoring chances yeah. What exactly are you looking for here?On Mikheyev?? Really?
Breakaways are good scoring chances yeah. What exactly are you looking for here?On Mikheyev?? Really?
Not sure what that has to do with my post
If you’ve watched this game, you’d know those figures are inaccurate. Fred has seen more than 1 high danger shot. He is playing well. This is not the game to stoke the Freddy is sh!t flame. As of yet at least13 high danger scoring chances to 1. two of our high danger chances went in out of 13. One out of one for them.
Is it possible our snipers are not as good as some think and neither are some of the goalies that are stoning them ?
Thought so and it makes sense to measure and quantify with a larger sample, but I have trouble suggesting that puck goes in 6% of the time.
It wasn't close to a goal...If Andersen let that in it would've been a horrible goal against.Breakaways are good scoring chances yeah. What exactly are you looking for here?
agreed, but you also need a goalie who can make saves. Someone else mentioned it. The leafs can play perfect for 18 minutes of the period and have 1 break down and it’s always a goal. Every team has breakdowns but their goals bail them out. Andersen has to start bailing out our defense when they do make a bad play.
but I can’t honestly sit here and say that they have been awful defensively this season. They’ve been alright but it’s just annoying how every time we do have a break down it’s a goal against