winnipegger
Registered User
- Dec 17, 2013
- 8,490
- 7,456
Here's why this convo is a nothingburgerHere's why this convo is a nothingburger
Cole has played 711 minutes this season, and he's been on the ice for 30 goals for and 19 against
Basically, that 11 goal difference spread over his entire season and assuming 45 second shifts and 8 minutes of ice a game ont the 4th line means that his team will outscore their opponents once every 8 games with him on the ice
Gus has played 267 minutes this year. He's been on for 6 goals for, and 9 against.
Based on the same assumptions as Cole regarding 4th line usage, Gus will be on the ice for one more goal against than for every 11 games
In other words, neither of these guys impact the game enough to be bitching about at the level we see here
How do you not consider Monahan a 2nd line center? He has been very effective so far in that role so far with the Jets. IMO Monahan is the type of player that makes those around him better as he does all the little things so well.Monahan isn't a second line centre. Toffolii is a great RW add. None of this had anything to do with Perfetti. He should be in the lineup in an everyday role with these players.
Exactly. Line combos and usage mean less than everyone around here makes them out to based on shitty made up stats and relative scoring ratesHere's why this convo is a nothingburger
Scheifele has played 968 minutes this season, and he's been on the ice for 50 goals for and 32 against
Basically, that 18 goal difference spread over his entire season and assuming 45 second shifts and 18 minutes of ice a game ont the top line means that his team will outscore their opponents once every 3 games with him on the ice
Perfetti has played 710 minutes this year. He's been on for 30 goals for, and 19 against.
Based on the same assumptions as Cole getting 1st line usage, Cole will result in his team outscoring his opponents once every 3.5 games
In other words, there is practically no difference in the impact of Cole or Scheifele in top line minutes.
Author's note: The sleight of hand employed in this post and the post this is a reply to is left as an exercise for the reader.
I get mostly everyone wants Perfetti to have success, it helps the Jets and that's all i really care about. I have a tough time calling out Bowness with the success we are having so far though but that's just me.
A great off season program would do wonders for him wherever the Jets decide he should line up, that and some confidence.That's a fair assessment, though I would like to see if he can carve out a role on the 4th line. The kid sure hit a wall and will need to battle like hell to get past it, but that can't happen from the PB. He has all the hockey smarts in the world, but hopefully this offseason he works on strength and speed as that is his 2 biggest obstacles at this point.
Made fun of her?Who banned Jane? The girls on here made fun of her and took snide shots at her great rack, but I don't recall anyone calling for a ban.
So what epic player debate do they have going on?HFRangers are neck and neck with us at 8 pages and they're not even allowed to shit post. We need to step up our game.
Exactly. Line combos and usage mean less than everyone around here makes them out to based on shitty made up stats and relative scoring rates
One of my favorite things about you as a poster is you reply to my posts to try to prove me wrong about something but end up just making my point for me. Thank you
How do you not consider Monahan a 2nd line center? He has been very effective so far in that role so far with the Jets. IMO Monahan is the type of player that makes those around him better as he does all the little things so well.
Rempe. They are predicting riots in the stands and the arrest of Laviolette.So what epic player debate do they have going on?
Exactly. Line combos and usage mean less than everyone around here makes them out to based on shitty made up stats and relative scoring rates
One of my favorite things about you as a poster is you reply to my posts to try to prove me wrong about something but end up just making my point for me. Thank you
I've always kind of seen him a little behind his age group physically and it might take him a year or 2 more to physically mature to the point where he can become the player his skill level should take him.A great off season program would do wonders for him wherever the Jets decide he should line up, that and some confidence.
Man there's a guy on the main board saying Hellebuyck is only good because of the Jets defense and I just can't even imagine how ignorant of the Jets and his entire career you would have to be, to make that take.
I gotta stay off that place lol.
But playing with Ehlers you don't need to drive play, you need to help keep possession, distribute the puck between the wings, be conscientious on defense and score on your opportunities. His production numbers are very much in line with #2 centers across the league.Because he's not playing second line comp and he's not driving play. He's a useful player but he's a sheltered third line C at home and an attempted sheltered third line C on the road who is good for the Jets on the PP.
He's not the guy who moves the bus like Scheifele or Lowry or Stastny(as a TDL acquisition).
I like his offense but I want no part of him matching against another teams top 6.
Transitive property doesn't apply lol. You can compare Cole to Gus on the 4th line and Cole to schief on the 1st line because Cole and Gus have played on the 4th line and Cole and Schief have played on the 1st line. Gus has never played on the first line and schief has never played on the 4thWhen you are agreeing with a post made in jest about Perfetti having practically equivalent impact to Scheifele, made in response to post that used the same flawed line of thinking that was trying to assert that Gus/Perfetti have the same impact (and thus by transitive property agreeing that Scheif/Gus have equivalent impact based on the parameters of these posts), then it is time to take a step back and observe the logical cul-de-sac you have argued yourself into.
I don't make posts trying to prove anyone wrong. If I respond to a post offering a counter it is because there is something in there that didn't make sense to me. I generally have an open mind that is open to being proven wrong. Maybe there is good reason Gus should play over Perfetti but what you presented is not that as the exact same argument can be used to defend making Scheifele a healthy scratch over Gus.
Har, har, har.Made fun of her?
Took snide shots?
I can't imagine anyone ever doing such a thing.
View attachment 838348
And hoping to stay that way for a few more years!We are now live...
I predict 1 more angst-riddled page of Gus vs Perfetti before we move on to the main course - Ehlers vs KFCLast chance to get your guesses into the Prediction Contest...
We've done that. Ehlers Schief does better than Connor Schief. Nobody has ever disagreed with thatCan you guys do that for Connor-Scheifele without Ehlers and Ehlers-Scheifele without Connor?
I wonder