voyageur
Hockey fanatic
- Jul 10, 2011
- 10,468
- 9,838
Stanley provides a physical element that Samberg doesn't have. And that will be needed as the games amp up. Samberg's skating will prevent more 2 on 1s, as he is not likely to get caught flat footed or cheat for offense too much. I thought Stanley was ok on the PK last night, but was also a little lucky he didn't get burnt. I wonder if the Jets push Nate Schmidt up to the top pairing and drop De Melo to level off the defensive pairings. De Melo had some pretty bad turnovers under pressure last night. Schmidt is more of a top 4 d-man, even if a little defensively challenged.I agree that the 6th spot needs to be a defensive Dman -
I also believe the org is looking for a certain type of game from Stan and it's not offense -
He may not be able to provide that game - in that case, Snerg has a huge opportunity to take that spot and keep it.
It's pretty obvious that the org is trying to transition their big damn into a D first player - why else would you pair him with Smitty. You know that his size is a factor they want to exploit. But the skill has to be there or it's a dream.
I think Bones is going to work hard to make this square peg fit into a round hole - but in the end, even a Stan fan like myself understands the odds are long on Stan getting up to speed (literally) before Snerg is in the lineup.
I want to see the best D group iced - and I don't think the Jets think otherwise - so your lineup is likely where the dust settles - soon.
I don't mind the idea of Samberg and Stanley platooning either, off the hop.