Windsor Spitfires 2022-23 Season Thread (Part 6)
- Thread starter nelli27
- Start date
- Status
OHLTG
Registered User
Lol haha. That's where the eye test comes in ( shout out to Teflon)
And BTW those stats are available if ya know the right people or have access to certain resources.
Strength of schedule n opponents is a stat easily accessible as well and was one I mentioned ( as I said it was posted earlier
)Quality chances against for those fans watching games and evaluating/comparing performances should also be easy to assess. If ya watch the games. And is tracked by teams.
Simple stats is lazy, analytics go much deeper and it's why they are tracked n used by teams. ( even if we dont have access ) My point was its not a complete picture was all.
Just simply looking at S% or records.....I can do that without ever seeing a game and it paints an incomplete picture
You guys are there every home home game, watch almost every second of every game yet rely on ohl stats with no context to form a judgement?
I'll take a combo of both every day of the week
SpitfireHabs1
Registered User
Rough first. Getting beat by a better structured team. 1st goal was a defensive breakdown with guy out front, but last two could have been stopped, also need more offensive chances, as this season gets later and later teams will gameplan us and shut us down, we have seen it against all these top teams, it's time for Savard to look in the mirror and maybe stop this run and gun full out offense Gameplan and maybe play some defense to and hell maybe even play with more bite in your game, getting Bullied out there and out coached, really driving your 1a/1b garbage talk home. Hope Onuska can stop the puck the rest of the way 2 more goals and this games all but sealed, especially if our offense cant start clicking. Gonna need a bipolar 2nd and 3rd to the first to pull out a win. I've seen crazier things in this league.
Go spits!!
Go spits!!
OMG67
Registered User
- Sep 1, 2013
- 12,088
- 7,836
67’s scored three in the last minute and a half against Oshawa earlier in the season and won in OT. So, yes. Anything can happen!
Maggio interview " it wasn't as bad as the score shows" are you kidding me?? 
Wake up Captain and round up the troops. Good grief, guys behind our forward moving D in front of our net with enough time to pour some tea. Horrible coverage in our zone by most of the D not just 1.
Wake up Captain and round up the troops. Good grief, guys behind our forward moving D in front of our net with enough time to pour some tea. Horrible coverage in our zone by most of the D not just 1.We look for the stretch pass first instead of basic zone exit and neutral zone control. Stretch passes work occasionally but not when it is every time. Leads to a ton of unnecessary icings. Last thing we need is the opposition having more time in our zone.
OHLTG
Registered User
Who said I "rely" on just that to form an opinion? I merely stated that I'm not going by JUST w/l record and would include at least those other stats to form any comparison.
not reviewable i guesss
lots of game to play still.
tighten up the defense by a lot would help.
Offsides not reviewable when ref calls it on the ice. Unlike a goal then you can check for Offsides. That was a good goal. What is with Dioniccio playing center lol. Sure miss basic checking. We have some big forwards who are wimps. Miss Spellacy and Sobeys hits
OHLTG
Registered User
I'm surprised something like that isn't reviewable. You'd think there would be an exception if it results in a goal.
Geez Dionicco is arguably our best center right now. He is amped up or maybe the team thinks playing 3D on line may help. Obviously Savard is not happy with a few.
OMG67
Registered User
- Sep 1, 2013
- 12,088
- 7,836
You can’t review it because it was called offside prior to the puck entering the net. Technically it is a dead puck as soon as it crossed the line. You can’t score with a dead puck.
I think it was onside but the replay I saw was too quick. The puck was in the white for sure. Was it fully in the white? I dunno but it looked like it still had a piece of the blue. But, the reality is the officials usually call it offside a lot in that situation. So many times the puck is onside and they blow it down because the puck touches the white. The unfortunate part was it stopped a goal. But it happens probably 4-5 times per night on meaningless plays when D-Men are trying to keep the puck in.
TheGremlin
Registered User
In his last 8 road games he struggled in 4 of them. That half his road games.
OHLTG
Registered User
Man if that was the 67's who scored on a non-reviewable play you would be sure to claim Windsor 'got 'lucky' on that play.
They should keep Dionico at center when Sobolev returns.
SpitfireHabs1
Registered User
The second was a Bipolar version of the first. Alot more players coming back and playing a 200 foot game and Onuska just had a retro period from last playoffs, Making a few big saves. Also noticed a little bit more push back from players out there and thats also great to see. You win as a team and lose as a team play for the emblem on your jersey and not the name on the back!!, Was a good period but wished we could have popped at least 1 more in heading into this third. Need that same effort and we could potentially get back into this game, time will tell.
Go Spits!!
You did? Partial quote, well done lol.
Dig deeper. Its easily accesdible info tonprovide context.
The analysis will hold more value and be more revelant
Travis Bickle 77
Registered User
- Feb 11, 2020
- 429
- 977
Better period for Windsor
Onuska is holding Windsor in with some big saves.
Time to return the favor and help him out.
Onuska is holding Windsor in with some big saves.
Time to return the favor and help him out.
- Status
