hockeylegend11
Registered User
- Sep 11, 2010
- 16,051
- 4,297
In the end goals win games ask London,last game they scored 1,last 3 they scored 7 plus an empty netter,and 2 of those 7 were on the PP,so 5 even strength goals in 3 games wins u nothing but 1 game win 2 losses and you are done.I love how it all about the points during regular season now. He never tells us about how average Windsor’s D has been which to me is possibly why Windsor failed this year. But you are right. He is excited about leading the conference for 2 years but if it was london that had done this it wouldn’t matter cause they never won the league. But if London won the league title it wouldn’t mean a thing cause we all know it Memorial Cup or it means nothing as Memorial Cup all that matters. He throws out all these numbers that favour Windsor like they mean something. Id rather windsor score 100 less goals if it meant they won the league. I’d rather be a 4 seed and win a title then a 1st and have nothing. Sometimes i get dizzy with all the circles i’m going in trying to figure out what his points are. Last year was a great year for Windsor no doubt. This year was just embarrassing. As simple as that. He will never mention Windsor blowing a 3-1 lead in 17 cause they won a cup.
Never claimed Windsor had a great D,but no one can explain if D is so bad why was Costanzo 5th best in average and save percentage this season ,and Onuska with his 4.44 average was 21st,last year in playoffs Medina was 1st at 2.01 with .938 save per centage, Onuska 8th at 2.77.
Should mention this year Brochu was 2.82 less then .025 then Costanzo, save per centage Brochu was .902,Costanzo. 901 and London supposedly better defence.
I will let u ignore completely 68 games over 4,your thinking wont change nor mine
Move on to next year.