This is a bizarre comment. The OP was asking who you would rather have in game 3, and your answer is someone too old to play? Surprised you didn't respond with DiPietro.
He asked to name a goalie that outperformed him when it matters and brought up whether anyone seen his playoff record thru minor midget. Not sure where he asked about who I’d rather start in game 3. Sounded more like they were defending onuska and how he has always outperformed other goalies when it mattered which is not the case.
Ottawa also lost their starting goalie in game 14 and their back up was too very good in the final 4 games.
In fairness, Andree was a pretty good goalie. He wasn’t the reason why they lost 4 straight. Guelph flipped the switch and took over the series. That;s the point. Time for Windsor to flip the switch.
Hey OMG don't tell them about the switch!
I know what the point was but Andree was not good at all. You don’t think Guelph wins 4 in a row if Ottawa doesn’t lose their goalie do you. Having a GAA of 5.15 and sv% of 844 makes it a lot easier to flip a switch and keep it going.
Andree had a 2.48 and .910 in the regular season and played more minutes than DiPietro. He had two poor games and two more than adequate games in That series. He was a more than capable goalie. He followed up that season with a 2.42 and .916 but Covid kept him from playoff hockey When the season was scrapped.
Which I think is possible. Kitchener hasn’t faced any adversity in this series yet and they have completely collapsed and had struggles finding consistency this year at times. My worry if I was a Spits fan is seeing Onuska in net starting Game 3.
And kudos to Kitchener to what they done so far,even more proof the 4-0 shutout the Rangers put on Windsor last night according to Kitchener Record reporter Josh Brown,was Windsor's 1st shutout against in 4 years,225 games including playoffs.
That is an incredible stat really. And it dates back to 2018 since Windsor has been shutout at home. In junior hockey, that’s a remarkable run.
They gave that same sob story after game 1. Even to the point where Savard 'guaranteed' they'd be better. They were not better. IF anything by watching the interviews after the game it appears they've already accepted defeat. Just dejected tones and the old we are getting outworked type thing. I see no desire they are going to just randomly turn it on now. Especially with a goalie who ranks 20th in GAA and save % in net. Heck, they generated zero real scoring chances last night.
Don't think you will see too many Spits fans at the Aud other than family. midweek games and outcomes don't look promising. most won't drop $100 dollars in gas money and tickets and concessions prices.
