Cfaub
While I agree its unlikely a team will win a title with 40 % roster with rooks though you have to admit because of the double cohort every team in the conference pretty much in the same boat,its how they plus your vets perform and I do like Windsor's future compared to anyone in the conference.
No doubt Medina has to play better overall,he did improve last year from 1st half to 2nd and I see the same trend happening.
With Henault playing,toss in Robinson, Ladd,and Renwick,that's 4 D with experience, more then most teams,Jodoin has played well early,Sobolev struggled in game 1,has been much better the last 2 outings,rookies Deangelis and Ride are starting to come along,it will be interesting to work 8D,never can have enough imo,in my view as along as the team controls play and they did most of the 3 games,good things will occur.
Scoring and more points from the likes of D'amico, Macdonald,and Maggio are essential for more team success,some of the vets you wrote about .
Medina ,18 months ago finished with a goals against average of 3.46,he is now 3.49 and dropping, just the 1 bad outing, better in Sarnia,even better in Windsor yesterday.
I never fault a goalie when losing a shootout especially if it goes to 8 shooters each.
Windsor should and will be building on what as occured in the last 2 outings,not game 1.
Toss in Henault, who I think must be improved from 18 months ago,would not have lasted in Europe last year,and an NHL development/ training camp for 7 weeks if he played like you said he did.
I think he will be a big add,and I will be curious to see how Baisov does when he returns, looked pretty good in the 1 game he played.
My confidence in this team hasn't changed,3 games way too early for concern,especially if there has been improvements since game 1.
Friday's rematch at London on Friday should be interesting.