Hynes is not even a coach. No ideas, no structure, no knowledge.
That's just silly. We have to realize ALL of the guys at this level have immense knowledge. Hynes is "an expert" at coaching, you can't really doubt that. He knows all the x's and o's, he has plenty of ideas. I think the biggest problem with him, from watching in Nashville was that maybe he just had "too many" ideas... he couldn't stick with any of them long enough or stop talking about them long enough for his players to figure out what he was really getting at. Aside from his go at establishing a "team identity" and getting everybody to start running around like chickens with their heads cut off looking for hits. That one kind of stuck.Hynes is not even a coach. No ideas, no structure, no knowledge.
Kind of like Edmonton. I don't think Woodcroft was the problem, but it's the easiest thing to do.I'm not sure if Evason was the problem. But I'm pretty darn sure Hynes isn't the solution.
He was not great with Nashville. They had some really solid rosters that he took nowhere.
I'm not sure if Evason is a good coach or not, but he was handicapped by the choices Minnesota made. There's too much dead cap. You can't afford better players down the middle. And when your goalies aren't stopping the puck, you're getting canned, eventually.
I think the organizational choices really left him with no chance to succeed.
Hynes has been a subpar coach in the NHL. Watching him coach in Nashville was frustrating at best. Usually when choosing a coach from the revolving door you want to avoid the crappier ones. Not sure what the Wild are thinking on this one. Hope it works out for them, but I will be utterly shocked if Hynes is able to turn things around.
perfect!Hynes is not even a coach. No ideas, no structure, no knowledge.
Laviolette = Stanley Cup champion, two-time losign finalistJohn Hynes officially joins the NHL old boys club of recycled head coaches, joining the rich history and tradition led by Peter Laviolette, Ken Hitchcock, Todd McLellan, and Bruce Boudreau.
That is what having no ideas, to fumble around.That's just silly. We have to realize ALL of the guys at this level have immense knowledge. Hynes is "an expert" at coaching, you can't really doubt that. He knows all the x's and o's, he has plenty of ideas. I think the biggest problem with him, from watching in Nashville was that maybe he just had "too many" ideas... he couldn't stick with any of them long enough or stop talking about them long enough for his players to figure out what he was really getting at. Aside from his go at establishing a "team identity" and getting everybody to start running around like chickens with their heads cut off looking for hits. That one kind of stuck.
I think the Preds were also at a juncture at the end of Poile's tenure where there was some pressure to "win now", even without having all the necessary pieces in place to do that effectively. Which probably fueled Hynes' approach to using veteran AHLers over younger players, and trying to emphasize physicality to make up for the lack of skill in his lineup. Until injuries piled up so deep at the end of his run that he had no choice but to use the younger players... and they proceeded to make him look like an even bigger fool by proving they were better than he had been giving them credit for.
Anyhow, I think he may lack some necessary ingredient for communicating effectively to his players, and he may have some BAD ideas. But he has ample knowledge of the game, he is clearly an intelligent person and a tireless worker. Maybe he'll find the right scenario that fits his approach somewhere. Just without the Old Boys networking, I would have expected he should have proven that somewhere else outside the NHL again before being let back in the door after failing in his previous 2 attempts.
EDIT: Oh yeah, make sure you don't get Granlund back. John Hynes loved that guy, played him into the ground even when it was obviously not working. I wonder who his new favorite child in Minnesota will be? I'd be afraid...
My low-key theory is Guerin has been trying to tank for 3 years while convincing the world he's trying to win and just incompetent.I'd hire literally anyone else.
Dean Evason looks like the kinda guy who is gonna be under suspicion of murder by tomorrow morning.
- they were not illegal contracts at the time they were signed.
- 14.7 m this year is the penalty for the team buying out Suter and Parise early.
- he could have avoided the penalties by not buying them out, or lessened them by just buying out Parise.
Never seen this but I am gonna make a point to.His expression always reminds me of Terence Stamp in "The Limey"
And Foligno.
Also he has given out NMC's to so many guys that he couldn't move them even if he wanted to.
Foligno got a 4x4 NMC before the season even started.Just looked @ Minny on CapFriendly and you weren't kidding. I remember back when Sutter was Flames GM they had like 9 or 10 guys with some sort of clause.
How on earth does Frederick Gaudreau get a M-NTC? Or Marcus Johansson with a full NTC?!