They have elite offense and Freddy is putting up some elite numbers behind below average dman.When was that?
Leafs are good but not elite in any way, shape or form.
They have elite offense and Freddy is putting up some elite numbers behind below average dman.When was that?
Leafs are good but not elite in any way, shape or form.
Literally the only best possession stat Matthews has is offensive zone starts this year. SIX different categories for both players and TWO seasons, Matthews is ahead in ONE of TWELVE...correct Matthews >> Marchand.
matthews plays with hyman, who needs the heimlich, and nylander who is on and off. marchand plays with bergeron and pasta. easily marchand has better linemates than matthews. bergeron tilts the ice in possession so obviously marchand would have higher possession numbers. also, shorthanded goals is not a defensive stat. its an offensive stat. however i do believe marchand is better than matthews defensively, but not overall. marchand imo is a guy who gets a lot of points and plays great defense, but he isn't a game breaker like matthews and the puck doesn't follow him like it does with matthews. another thing. selke voting isn't the best way to determine who is better defensively. you have to have quite a bit of points to be nominated for the selke. in 2013 ilya kovlachcuck was 38th in selke voting and he was a -6 that season.So, back to Oompa Loompas rule #1: “In Toronto, goals >>> goals AND assists”. Hence for example Matthews 69 points season in 16-17 >>> McDavid’s 100 points. Great logic!
And by the way, even for pure goals, Marchand has 54, while Matthews 57 (while having played 3 more games...), it’s not even a major difference. 17 points is a little bit bigger than 3 goals...
Possession stats? Why not.
16-17 & 17-18...
Corsi: Marchand 60.7 & 56.8...Matthews 52.2 & 51.4
Corsi Rel: Marchand 8.5 & 5.5 ... Matthews 2.3 & 1.5
Fenwick: Marchand 60.8 & 54.9... Matthews 51.7 & 50.4
FF Rel: Marchand 7.8 & 2.5... Matthews 2.6 & 1.5
PDO: Marchand 98.2 & 105... Matthews 99.9 & 106.1
Ozs: Marchand 54.8 & 56.7... Matthews 63.0 & 48.4
And don’t go there about two way game... it’s a known fact that Marchand is a monster in that (last year he was 12th in Selke voting. Matthews 38th)... He is 47th ALL TIME in short handed goals, by the way.
Marchand is better than Matthews. All numbers put together confirm it.
I hate to admit it, but Marchand has a real good case for being better than Matthews. and that's not a slight against Matthews, Marchand is just that good. At ES I'd call them about even with a slight edge to Matthews, but Marchand is obviously a lot better on the PP + PKSo, back to Oompa Loompas rule #1: “In Toronto, goals >>> goals AND assists”. Hence for example Matthews 69 points season in 16-17 >>> McDavid’s 100 points. Great logic!
And by the way, even for pure goals, Marchand has 54, while Matthews 57 (while having played 3 more games...), it’s not even a major difference. 17 points is a little bit bigger than 3 goals...
Possession stats? Why not.
16-17 & 17-18...
Corsi: Marchand 60.7 & 56.8...Matthews 52.2 & 51.4
Corsi Rel: Marchand 8.5 & 5.5 ... Matthews 2.3 & 1.5
Fenwick: Marchand 60.8 & 54.9... Matthews 51.7 & 50.4
FF Rel: Marchand 7.8 & 2.5... Matthews 2.6 & 1.5
PDO: Marchand 98.2 & 105... Matthews 99.9 & 106.1
Ozs: Marchand 54.8 & 56.7... Matthews 63.0 & 48.4
And don’t go there about two way game... it’s a known fact that Marchand is a monster in that (last year he was 12th in Selke voting. Matthews 38th)... He is 47th ALL TIME in short handed goals, by the way.
Marchand is better than Matthews. All numbers put together confirm it.
Go get stats that say Matthews is better. All numbers I posted says Marchand is significantly better.I asked for a lot of things. not just one thinf.
Simply put, I heard this possession over and over and I took a look and Marchand HAS way better numbers there too.matthews plays with hyman, who needs the heimlich, and nylander who is on and off. marchand plays with bergeron and pasta. easily marchand has better linemates than matthews. bergeron tilts the ice in possession so obviously marchand would have higher possession numbers. also, shorthanded goals is not a defensive stat. its an offensive stat. however i do believe marchand is better than matthews defensively, but not overall. marchand imo is a guy who gets a lot of points and plays great defense, but he isn't a game breaker like matthews and the puck doesn't follow him like it does with matthews. another thing. selke voting isn't the best way to determine who is better defensively. you have to have quite a bit of points to be nominated for the selke. in 2013 ilya kovlachcuck was 38th in selke voting and he was a -6 that season.
why the hell are we even arguing? I've been a fan of the Bruins since the bam bam cam days (leafs fan first), and we are the 2nd and 3rd best teams in the conference.
Auston Matthews has a higher P/60 and P1/60 than Marchand. Also, not discrediting Marchand, but if he has the best possession stats in the game then couldn't you make an argument, using your logic of possession stats, that he's better than Kucherov, Stamkos, etc?And Marchand is one of the best defensive wingers in the league AND he puts up more points and has a better PPG than Matthews.
I also note that you asked for possession stats, but decided to ignore them when I posted them, as they don’t fit your agenda.
Why is Auston Matthews considered a top-ten, even top-five player already? Obviously he had an incredible rookie season, but having him rated above guys like Stamkos, Schiefele, etc is unjustified imo. I will name all the forwards I think are better than him.
(In no order)
McDavid
Stamkos
Kucherov
Crosby
Malkin
Ovechkin
Tarasenko
Tavares
Benn
Backstrom
Kane
Gaudreau
Schiefele
Wheeler
Just of the top of my head. In the future Matthews could pass most of these guys, but why is he already considered so great? Toronto Bias?
You have an argument with most of those guys but GTFOH with Blake Wheeler on your list. And what has Gaudreau shown to be ahead of Matthews?
I am not a fan of P/60. It can be easily skewed pretty badly. A couple of weeks ago (= of course now it must have changed), I remember reading that Hischier had a P/60 of 2.73, while McDavid had a P/60 of 2.72 in his rookie year. No one in the universe would ever say that Hischier > McDavid for that.Auston Matthews has a higher P/60 and P1/60 than Marchand. Also, not discrediting Marchand, but if he has the best possession stats in the game then couldn't you make an argument, using your logic of possession stats, that he's better than Kucherov, Stamkos, etc?
Let me know when Matthews doesn't get hammered out in the 1st round bud. His first season is looking more like a fluke than the norm.
A: 109 games, 117 points... 32 points in 29 games in 17-18
B: 112 games, 100 points... 31 points in 30 games in 17-18
Who is better, A or B? Thought so.
Can a player really be generational if his team doesn’t make the playoffs? Has that happened before other than rookie seasons?
Whichever one is Matthews
Is being a top 3 RW in the league the past 4-5 seasons some sort of plug status?You have an argument with most of those guys but GTFOH with Blake Wheeler on your list. And what has Gaudreau shown to be ahead of Matthews?
Blake Wheeler is an awesome player no doubt. You don't think he's better than Matthews right now though do you?Is being a top 3 RW in the league the past 4-5 seasons some sort of plug status?
never said he was tripe. he's just not auston matthews.Hey ok, sure. You can have a lot of pride in Matthews - great player, can only get even better - and how you turned around the team in the past one and a half season.
But don’t discount someone like Marchand, because the guy is no shredded tripe.
That's nice but the Oilers would hang up the phone and die from hysterical laughter if the Leafs ever tried spinning a Matthews for McDavid swap straight up.I would not trade Matthews for a single player on that list going forward, including McDavid.
You have an argument with most of those guys but GTFOH with Blake Wheeler on your list. And what has Gaudreau shown to be ahead of Matthews?
Can a player really be generational if his team doesn’t make the playoffs? Has that happened before other than rookie seasons?
Its happened before. One player doesn't make a team obviously. Can a player be generational that's never had better than a 20th place finish in scoring and sits in 50+ place half way though their 2nd season?