But the shift to shift impact? It's Crosby by a huge amount. Like...a not-worthy-of-a-poll amount haha
^^That's just a complete failure of player evaluation.
Then again you also claimed Ovechkin was a "shoot-only" player so....
What This Means for You:
Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.
In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord ServerBut the shift to shift impact? It's Crosby by a huge amount. Like...a not-worthy-of-a-poll amount haha
Ugh, don't make me pull out the tape again haha^^That's just a complete failure of player evaluation.
Then again you also claimed Ovechkin was a "shoot-only" player so....
Ugh, don't make me pull out the tape again haha
Just take the counting stat goal win and be happy...don't try to overplay the hand like he's out there doing a bunch of useful stuff. No one watching the games is falling for that, even other Caps fans are saying that. You're gonna win the thing you like, don't invite people to evaluate his game play, it's just gonna make him look bad at a time where he should be celebrated...
I am a capitals fan and an ovechkin fan
I find it very difficult to honestly rank how well Ovechkin does. Eye test wise he looks terrible most of the time to be frank. Yet he can look terrible all game and then score two goals to win the game.
Meanwhile Crosby looks better and more impactful via eye test but does that matter if doesn’t result in more goals scored while you are on the ice or your team winning more?
This isn’t a new thing. I think Ovechkin has looked terrible for many many years at this point yet he just keeps scoring.
McDavid looked brutal all game against the USA in the four nation final, then scored the golden goal to win it all. Did the previous 60 minutes of suckage matter?
Similarly, people can take things too literally, never let it go, and pretend like it's interesting to anyone else. Like, is it really "passive" aggressive in an exchange like this...? haha
Multi-dimensional, for me, really depends on the context. Typically, it refers to players that can play well at both ends of the ice. In other contexts, it means being a balanced attacker (one who is a major plus in goal scoring and playmaking). I don't say that to dismiss or discount physicality...not at all. But that's not necessarily the first thing that jumps to mind when talking about "multi-dimensional talent" for me. Other folks are free to interpret things as they see fit, of course...
It gets lost sometimes that Ovechkin was given a greenlight offensively to cheat for most of his career and when the Caps didn't have the puck, to disregard any thought of defensive positioning to try to make big hits.
In fairness, because I want things to be as representative of "correctness" as possible...this was definitely the case for much of the Bylsma era especially. He got the Gretzky treatment, where Kurri would be his F1 back.Crosby typically had defensive minded wingers to take the defensive responsibilities.
And most importantly they stapled him to the bench in the final minutes of the SCF clincher instead of parading him out there for empty nettersIt gets lost sometimes that Ovechkin was given a greenlight offensively to cheat for most of his career and when the Caps didn't have the puck, to disregard any thought of defensive positioning to try to make big hits.
The Caps won the Cup when Ovechkin was clearly making an effort to be a 2-way player.
Ovechkin actually carried a team to the playoffs last year thoughOveckhin is more impressive this season but definitely not more impressive than Sid’s last couple of seasons. Sid was absolutely insane at end quarter of last season, trying to carry a dead team to the playoffs, best player in the world in that time. After all, Ovi has 50 points in 48 games this season in a league leader. Nice.
If I used Ovi fans reasoning, Sid is way more impressive this season as well as it is Ovi’s weakness and fault that he is injured and Sid has been way more productive, by 18 points.
65 points and -22 is a weird way to carry a team.Ovechkin actually carried a team to the playoffs last year though
Lol. If it wasn’t for his complete turnaround at the half way mark the Capitals weren’t sniffing the playoffs.65 points and -22 is a weird way to carry a team.
Yeah the fact he played like he comes from a retirement home for 60% of the season does not make his case any betterLol. If it wasn’t for his complete turnaround at the half way mark the Capitals weren’t sniffing the playoffs.
Ovechkin stands still in a spot for majority of the game. How can you not see that? N it has been years like that. So what he can one timer a puck. There are at least 30 better players in the leagueI'll give Crosby/Pens fans this: You are great at politics. You can take a weakness (Crosby's alleged defense) and turn it into a perceived strength for anyone not watching the tape or able to comprehend the statistics. You can take one gif and pretend it says something huge. You can dumb down entire careers to extremely rare acts - like penalty shots - as if that makes or breaks a player to the extent that leading the league in goals 3 times somehow morphs into being better than leading the league 9 times.
Similarly, you can take a clear strength (Ovechkin's physicality) and simply pretend it doesn't exist. Over and over again. And that too can take hold with sheer repetition.
But you have to bank on people not thinking for themselves, not watching the games, and not comprehending the meaning of basic words (such as "dimension" and "only"). Admittedly, it works a surprising amount of the time.
Well obviously Crosby is being carried be generational players like...checks the actual stats...Rust and Rakell right MJ?Crosby is 1 point behind Mackinnon and Kucherov in 5on5 points and 7 points ahead of McDavid. This is as impressive as it gets
And that makes it even more impressive - still scoring despite how slow he looksI find it very difficult to honestly rank how well Ovechkin does. Eye test wise he looks terrible most of the time to be frank. Yet he can look terrible all game and then score two goals to win the game.
Meanwhile Crosby looks better and more impactful via eye test but does that matter if doesn’t result in more goals scored while you are on the ice or your team winning more?
This isn’t a new thing. I think Ovechkin has looked terrible for many many years at this point yet he just keeps scoring.
McDavid looked brutal all game against the USA in the four nation final, then scored the golden goal to win it all. Did the previous 60 minutes of suckage matter?