Do you realize that you have just said that you expect Suzuki and KK to be 1 and 2 Cs in 2 years, and then suggested giving Danault 6 years at 6 mill, to, if if you are correct, play on line 3 for 4-5 years? I cannot believe this thread. It's a f***ing travesty.
Feels good man. It's because I'm sober, which I detest. Usually I'd be pissed watching moronic youtube vids or be at some scummy bar.Warning: @bsl has been doing a rapid-fire post reply of all 13 pages in this thread. He's calling all of you out, some of you for good reason.
My theory is that the 'middle class' in the NHL is being hollowed out. You pay your 4-5 big guys shitloads, and pay the rest peanuts. I'm exaggerating but Chicago had some success with this. Habs have and have had way too many bloated contracts for middling players. And 6 Mill for Danault would be one of them.
We can't score goals, but let's spent 4.4 mil on a back up goalie, most likely 3.5 mil for Edmundson, 4+ mil for a stay at home AHL bound Alzner. and 6 mil for a defensive forward in Danault.
JT Miller would have been the perfect fit with Suzuki and Domi at RW.
Or having an affair with his dog and grooming his maid. Same thing, it does not fly!
Had him in my pool last year. Knew he would kill it when he left Tampa. One of my favourite players. Does it all. But he was playing with Horvat. That helps. I had petterson and Horvat too. Killed it.
The Danault support arguments here are .....interesting. Need to raise your game folks.
Domi had 70 points as a young C man 2 years ago and you are tossing him. WTF is going on here?
LOL. Bo Horvat? Are you serious? Do you watch hockey other than Habs? Horvat will likely get 8 mill on his next contract. Maybe more. And deserve every penny. He is the lifeblood of the Nucks and does everything well.
Never say or write 'to be honest'. It implies that you normally are not, and makes people really uptight with you at the office and with what you are about to say. But I like your post very much.
Kevin Hayes is 6-5, 216, and has averaged about 23 goals a year the last 4 years. He is a center that scores goals. On the second line. Something Habs desperately need and that Danualt does not do. And he is very good at defence. I've had him in my pools and watched him a lot.
Not sure if being sarcastic? If not, Correlation and Causation. Look it up.
Danault is a pending UFA. Domi is not. Are you prepared to have Danault get 6 mill as a third line C for 7 years?Danault more than Domi but my preference is to keep Danault. We saw 10 good games of two promising centers aged 20 and people are ready to push the eject button on Danault. Wo man, relax a bit. On a stretch of 82 games don't you think that one of Su and KK will have ups and down. Some down that can last 10 games. Don't you think it's safer to keep Danault? You think he's a luxury, I think he's a major part if the team finally makes the PO.
Now I think Domi have some value because he is somehow a good player. As long as he have chemistry with his wingers or his centerman, depending where he plays, he is versatile. He is a small size player, something Habs have in a dozen. I would like Habs grow in size and removing Danault is a downgrade in size to start with.
And about what he said I think he reacted like a man who have some pride. Of course here people over-react because it's a forum, a little thing get out of proportion. I've read "Princess Danault" (not you Runner). "Princess Danault", ... no but seriously?
