hockeywiz542
Registered User
- May 26, 2008
- 16,362
- 5,366
Inside Armstrong’s puck-wired brain, he could be excited about the challenge in Toronto. He told LeBrun in 2019 that working in a Canadian market would be a “special” opportunity. He led the Blues to the first Stanley Cup in their 52-year history and will forever live with that legacy, so why not try to create another legacy by ending the Leafs’ championship drought, which now sits at 56 years?
Would Armstrong even be the one making those decisions with the Maple Leafs?
In St. Louis, he took over as GM in 2010 and worked under team president John Davidson. But in 2012, the Blues bought out Davidson’s contract and then in 2013 appointed Armstrong as president of hockey operations. So for a decade now, Armstrong has been in charge of all hockey decisions in St. Louis. He has stability and the trust of his owner. He keeps Stillman abreast of everything and gets his endorsement on signings and trades, but for all practical purposes, no one stands in his way of doing things the way he wants them done.
Is Armstrong going to leave that setup to be second in charge in Toronto behind Shanahan? Well, Lou Lamoriello did it for three seasons from 2015 to ’18, but Lamoriello is now with the New York Islanders, and his replacement, Dubas, is now looking for a job. Either Shanahan would have to allow some give in having the final say — and why would he do that? — or Armstrong would be giving up a lot of power because he’s infatuated with the idea of working for the Maple Leafs.
Sure there would be a massive reward if all went well, but if it didn’t in four or five years, he’d be 62 or 63 years old and looking for a new place to land.
So that brings us back to the point: Why would Stillman want anyone else to be at the wheel for the retool? I don’t believe he does, and that’s why I think he’s not going to give Shanahan permission to have that dialogue.
Maybe the only way it could happen is if Armstrong went to Stillman and said, “Hey, I’d like to talk to the Maple Leafs.” And is he really going to ask that of the owner who promoted him to president of hockey operations, made him one of the highest-paid executives in the league, allowed him to spend to the salary cap with a small-market team every year, stay long enough to win a Stanley Cup, work simultaneously for Team Canada, and so on?
That would be the gutsiest decision Armstrong has made in his hockey career
He should have been given another chance.Hasnt Gillis been out of hockey since the Canucks firing?
Mike Gillis trade history: Mike Gillis Trade History - CapFriendly - NHL Salary CapsChanging my vote for Mike Gillis.
He deserves another shot. Always considered him very smart and ahead of the curve.
Lol that would be hilarious. At that point you could only laugh or cry.Are we getting trolled? Who the f*** is voting for Mark Bergevin? He's a worse option than Trevelling; only option I can think of worse than Bergevin is Jim Benning...
Marc Bargainbin would be great for the LolsAre we getting trolled? Who the f*** is voting for Mark Bergevin? He's a worse option than Trevelling; only option I can think of worse than Bergevin is Jim Benning...
We’d never run out of 4th linersMarc Bargainbin would be great for the Lols
I'm curious why Gillis never got another job after Vancouver?
They were pretty dominant there for a while. Would have won the cup in 2011 if half their team wasn't injured
First Up (TSN) said they heard Jim Nill's name. 1 year left on his contract.