Jersey Fan 12
Positive Vibes
- Nov 20, 2006
- 6,960
- 3,012
If they bring in Quinnville, I would stop being a fan, full stop
Until they make the playoffs.
If they bring in Quinnville, I would stop being a fan, full stop
Q can coach but even if Bettman gives the ok, this team does not need a guy fresh out of reform school after the fiasco of hiring Babcock who was fresh out of reform school (though clearly part of the early release program).quenneville is not an option. And he wasn’t going to be even if he was allowed to be.
People are concerned about something that isn’t even possible right now. So, unless Q gets reinstated (which is doubtful considering he’s been banned for years now), there’s literally nothing to worry about. A waste of energy.Q can coach but even if Bettman gives the ok, this team does not need a guy fresh out of reform school after the fiasco of hiring Babcock who was fresh out of reform school (though clearly part of the early release program).
You don't know that...every fan is different. I know Browns fans that swore off the team after DW was acquired. Some went back when the team started winning, some only follow the team when DW is suspended or injured (which is most of the time) and I know others who have not watched a game, checked the scores, headlines or standings in 2+ years.Until they make the playoffs.
You don't know that...every fan is different. I know Browns fans that swore off the team after DW was acquired. Some went back when the team started winning, some only follow the team when DW is suspended or injured (which is most of the time) and I know others who have not watched a game, checked the scores, headlines or standings in 2+ years.
BTW, I fall into the second category although I would be hard pressed to name fifteen guys on the roster anymore...and I was a long time STH. And I am cool with it, I have found other things to do with my time and money.
Sorry, can't root for a team that hires a sexual assault enabler, that's an easy "nope" from me, but I put morals over sports, most people won'tUntil they make the playoffs.
Sorry, can't root for a team that hires a sexual assault enabler, that's an easy "nope" from me, but I put morals over sports, most people won't
To be fair usually you prep for questions like that to where you can practice saying "that is an issue between the league and Q and we have no comments regarding this situation" but dipshit there brought up as a question for no reason out of left field. I don't blame him for Waddell fumbling that question as that's a topic that shouldn't even had been brought up.People are reading Waddell's response to the Q question as potential interest. I'm reading it as that's a quagmire topic that I'm just not going to get involved in. As in, he started to give what he felt was as non-committal an answer as possible and then caught himself and realized that no answer was the best answer.
I keep hearing that Waddell wants an experienced NHL head coach. Jalonen is not that guy. As for the connections between Jalonen and Waddell, what are they? Just because both are involved in hockey does not mean they have any familiarity with each other. And what's the connection to Laine (a guy we are planning to trade this off-season) other than the fact Laine and Jalonen are both Finnish?
IMO, the chance to bring in Jalonen and break glass ceilings was when Jarmo hired Lars when the team was super young, inexperienced and not particularly good. This team is in a different place now, still young and perhaps still not great but this team needs to start taking forward steps to being competitive again and cannot afford yet another "learn on the job" coach. The CBJ need a guy who has already "seen this and done that" in the NHL.
To be fair usually you prep for questions like that to where you can practice saying "that is an issue between the league and Q and we have no comments regarding this situation" but dipshit there brought up as a question for no reason out of left field. I don't blame him for Waddell fumbling that question as that's a topic that shouldn't even had been brought up.
The person who made the comment was previously a writer in Chicago and has been pressing hard to get Columbus to consider Q if he's reinstated...the question was made with an agenda based on his previous statements.Except that that is probably a question on the minds of most fans.
Seems like that is what sports journalists used to do all the time.
In the internet era, particularly here in New Jersey, these are usually little more than releases for the team to issue a pre-established message.
The candor from people like Waddell and Briere in Philadelphia is refreshing.
Idk about Shaw, always just strikes me as an assistant coach. A good one, but I don’t know if he’s head man material.I am mostly avoiding this thread because the last time I wanted a coach his team immediately started really sucking afterwards.
I find myself wondering about an alternate timeline where the Jackets interviewed Brad Shaw as well as Larsen a few years ago and Shaw was given the job. Would we still be in the same spot?
Since you can’t downvote posts - which I would do ten times if available - I’ll take this route:Quinnville is an elite coach. I dont care about off ice issues. I don’t watch sports to care about personal or legal issues.
But Don said himself this morning that Hartley had reached out to him but he had not spoken to him yet.
In all honesty, I do think Hartley makes some sense. He has familiarity with some players on the roster and with Don. He has good experience and has won a cup. If he is truly "in" on wanting to be an NHL coach again he seems like a good fit but it is a concern that he hasn't been in the NHL for several years and the league has changed a bit since then.
Hartley could be the man who sets Elvis straight having coach him with Latvia.