strungout
Professional Killer
Jay Feaster? Wow. He shouldn't be a candidate for anything. Rather bring McPhee back.
Jay Feaster? Wow. He shouldn't be a candidate for anything. Rather bring McPhee back.
I agree but I think Vancouver's situation also applies. He was interviewed a little while ago and his timeframe then was mid-May. Now he's pushed it back a bit and it has to be due to these unsettled GM spots.Wonder how much Trotz' comments on time-frame apply to the Caps?
My feeling - a bunch.
Was he the one who reported the Belanger story?
I'm pretty sure there was something else more recently too, but I can't remember what. He's also considered a reliable source in general.
He tends to have a pipeline on league info as well (suspensions, contracts, waivers).I think you may be right about Belanger. While he's generally a credible source, he's pretty limited to French Canadien and Montreal stories. It's not often that he gets scoops from outside of there.
I think you may be right about Belanger. While he's generally a credible source, he's pretty limited to French Canadien and Montreal stories. It's not often that he gets scoops from outside of there.
I wouldn't read too much into the affiliation being renewed. It was close a few weeks ago so it seemed like it was going to happen regardless of what happens at the GM position.
Feaster? that is my nightmare
1st to report the Seguin trade and the Luongo trade. In my opinion he's the 2nd most reliable behind Bob Mac and just ahead of Kypreos.
Question, if Bylsma and Shero are fired would people be against both of them being brought in? If we retain the same scouting staff I think you can limit Shero's biggest weakness, though I'm not sure I'm totally down with both of them (or either of them) but I think its better then some of the linked possibilities.
Shero's picks in the last six Drafts played in 240 NHL games. McPhee's picks over the same span played total of 1148.
Not trying to isolate you or defend Shero, but this metric of NHL games played is bollocks. A team with a lot of veterans is not going to play a lot of draft picks, and a team playing a lot of its draft picks doesn't mean it's drafting well or playing well. It simply means it's playing a lot of its draft picks.
Not trying to isolate you or defend Shero, but this metric of NHL games played is bollocks. A team with a lot of veterans is not going to play a lot of draft picks, and a team playing a lot of its draft picks doesn't mean it's drafting well or playing well. It simply means it's playing a lot of its draft picks.
It just means that Shero didn't draft many players that were good enough for the NHL, while McPhee did.
Shero's picks in the last six Drafts played in 240 NHL games. McPhee's picks over the same span played total of 1148.
Shero made a few disastrous acquisitions for almost useless veteran players (Morrow, Murray) both of whom were significant overpayments.
Shero has a history of having the dirtiest players in the league on his team (Jarkko Ruutu, Matt Cooke, James Neal).
That all leads me to belief Shero has a mentality of an old-fashioned hockey fan who believes that having older players and playing dirty helps you win. He lives in the goonery of the 80s.
Shero managed to waste some of the best years of Crosby and Malkin.
That's not to mention Shero seems to have tried all NHL players at wings of Crosby and Malkin. That list includes Jussi Jokinen, Lee Stempniak, Tyler Kennedy, Matt Cooke, Max Talbot, Arron Asham, Zach Boychuk, Beau Bennett. This list is not full, and that's over the last four seasons.
Long story shrt, when adversity came, he failed to come up with answers like Stan Bowman did with the Blackhawks. I don't see much difference between him and McPhee.