BringTheReign
Registered User
draft year eligible OHL. Look at the PPGView attachment 351714
I believe Byfield is the youngest player on this list during his draft year to boot.
draft year eligible OHL. Look at the PPGView attachment 351714
Agreed that in terms of moving down, Detroit is a better trading partner.
I just think we have much more to offer in a trade than Yzerman does.
Obviously Detroit being at 4 certainly makes it very difficult to be sure that, if you did move back to 5, you'd get your man.
Staying at 2 makes a lot of sense but hey, the Sens are in rough shape so I gotta ask
Agreed that in terms of moving down, Detroit is a better trading partner.
I just think we have much more to offer in a trade than Yzerman does.
Obviously Detroit being at 4 certainly makes it very difficult to be sure that, if you did move back to 5, you'd get your man.
Staying at 2 makes a lot of sense but hey, the Sens are in rough shape so I gotta ask
draft year eligible OHL. Look at the PPGView attachment 351714
Let’s hope he’s more Stamkos and less Wellwood.draft year eligible OHL. Look at the PPGView attachment 351714
draft year eligible OHL. Look at the PPGView attachment 351714
What's also notable about this is Byfield is the youngest (2nd youngest?) on that list AND that out of the last few years, he's the only one who did it solo (as opposed to those stacked Erie otters teams as well as Tkachuk-Dvorak-Marner).
I hope this isnt the Kings philosophy for drafting players due to political purposes,this is a sport,not a popularity contest.Best available player should be drafted for the organization success on the ice and the only factor contributing to this pick or any pick in the future no matter who it is, not the race of the player.Saying that,after doing a little research on Byfield vs Stützle on video and reading the scouting reports, I am leaning Stutzle barely.But I wouldnt be upset either if Kings traded the pick for more assets and got Drysdale.I would take Byfield too - just analyzing from Kings perspective.
How great would it be in a Laker-Clipper town that two of the Kings top players in a few years are African American players - Thomas and Byfield. That would really help the game grow and bring in new fans.
I would be willing to listen to offers as long as the Kings could get Drysdale and a top level prospect in return.If not ,you keep the pick and make the best player available choice for the organization success going forward.Given that the Kings want to compete with Kopitar and Doughty still playing top roles in the near future, I'd suspect Ottawa would need to include a top young player/NHL-ready prospect to get LA to think about trading down. So, who is the best NHL-ready prospect you'd be willing to trade to go from #5 to #2, or #3 to #2?
I don't want the Kings to trade the pick, but for the sake of your argument, I think the question above is key.
I love the sport (but have never really played it) can someone explain to me why Stutzle can play lw and center yet Byfield can only play center?
I always read people saying that center is the more important position and that players like carter can switch to wing if he struggles at c and we get more center depth.
Could byfield not also play wing?
Possibly vision and speed along with experience playing both positions.I love the sport (but have never really played it) can someone explain to me why Stutzle can play lw and center yet Byfield can only play center?
I always read people saying that center is the more important position and that players like carter can switch to wing if he struggles at c and we get more center depth.
Could byfield not also play wing?
I love the sport (but have never really played it) can someone explain to me why Stutzle can play lw and center yet Byfield can only play center?
I always read people saying that center is the more important position and that players like carter can switch to wing if he struggles at c and we get more center depth.
Could byfield not also play wing?
The centerman needs to be more responsible in his own own covering down low, but is also required to help on the rush to break out of their own zone. A wing, on the other hand, doesn't have as much responsibility in covering one of the D.
If a forward can play both the wing and center it shows off their versatility, which is a good thing. But because certain wingers who also play center get burnt playing down low they are often moved to the wing (since they can't handle the defensive-side of the game).
Given Stutzle's (lack of) height and speed, I'd wager he'd fit in better on the wing in the NHL regardless of wether he can play C. But time will tell.
Given Stutzle's (lack of) height and speed,
Slow? Not even closeThe centerman needs to be more responsible in his own own covering down low, but is also required to help on the rush to break out of their own zone. A wing, on the other hand, doesn't have as much responsibility in covering one of the D.
If a forward can play both the wing and center it shows off their versatility, which is a good thing. But because certain wingers who also play center get burnt playing down low they are often moved to the wing (since they can't handle the defensive-side of the game).
Given Stutzle's (lack of) height and speed, I'd wager he'd fit in better on the wing in the NHL regardless of wether he can play C. But time will tell.
I’d want #3 and #5 for 2OA... I’d include a 2nd rounder on our side, for arguments sake. I’m willing to bet that in 10 years Byfield is the best player from this draft. He’s one of the youngest players in his draft class, he’s raw but still hugely effective and has massive upside... his potential is huge. If Ottawa want him they should have to pay a big price.Given that the Kings want to compete with Kopitar and Doughty still playing top roles in the near future, I'd suspect Ottawa would need to include a top young player/NHL-ready prospect to get LA to think about trading down. So, who is the best NHL-ready prospect you'd be willing to trade to go from #5 to #2, or #3 to #2?
I don't want the Kings to trade the pick, but for the sake of your argument, I think the question above is key.
Given Stutzle's (lack of) height and speed, I'd wager he'd fit in better on the wing in the NHL regardless of wether he can play C. But time will tell.
Kings Have Only One Option at No. 2: Tim Stützle
Byfield vs. Stützle
Sudbury Wolves star Quinton Byfield is ranked No. 2 by general consensus. However, he is a center, and the Kings already have Gabriel Vilardi (No. 11 in 2017), Alex Turcotte (No. 5 in 2019) and Tyler Madden (No. 68 in 2018) projected to slot in there. That’s discounting players like captain Anze Kopitar, who currently acts as the team’s top pivot and isn’t going anywhere anytime soon, with four years left on his deal, which has a $10 million cap hit and a no-trade clause to boot.
On the left side, the Kings really only have winger Arthur Kaliyev in terms of blue-chip prospects. Furthermore, Alex Iafallo is effectively their top-line left-winger, which should tell you all need to know in terms of their depth on that side, even if only due to the fact that he should be considered a top trade chip, as he only has one year left on his deal. The Kings simply need Stützle more than Byfield.
To read more click on the article link below
https://thehockeywriters.com/los-angeles-kings-stutzle-draft-byfield/
Congrats on 2nd pick fellas!
Just wondering if there are any Kings board insiders who have potentially spoken about who the Kings prefer more at #2?
On the Sens board, the insiders believe its Byfield for us.
Thank you!