Machinehead
HFNYR MVP
Our offense is 4 guys setting up Zibanejad's shot.Toronto's "offense" seems to be to have 4 guys setting up Matthew's shot.
Our offense is 4 guys setting up Zibanejad's shot.Toronto's "offense" seems to be to have 4 guys setting up Matthew's shot.
Our offense is 4 guys setting up Zibanejad's shot.
Matter of fact: time in grade is a thing.Like Hartford is a great place to prove that you can coach a team and get a job as an NHL coach? Just maybe not with the Rangers.
Have you ever worked in an environment where promotions are given strictly based on tenure?
I am all for giving Knoblauch the role, if he is the best person available for this team.
If you're mocking me then you havent kept track of what I've posted and when. Either way I don't care much.My friend who knows said..... when series was tied ...if Rangers lose.... GG is gone..... period. And that's that! PS ...trying to find out who next coach is...nothing yet
The difference is that things I have said have later come out as true. Whichever, have a good weekend, cheersLikewise
The difference is that things I have said have later come out as true. Whichever, have a good weekend, cheers
Pardon my ignorance, but, if you do have an inside track, is that what you're hearing, a big name coach?I'll let you hang on to the things that you are convinced about.
I would have been fine with that higher in season, but based on what's happening around this team and the fact they just fired a coach that just had to 100 points seasons It's safe to say that the GM is probably not going to be gambling his job on hiring the team's AHL coach, or at least that's not his first choice. Doesn't mean that he won't get the job, but I can all but assure you that's not choice
Interesting.And don’t sleep on Bob Hartley
The difference is that things I have said have later come out as true. Whichever, have a good weekend, cheers
I've mentioned some names I know about.Pardon my ignorance, but, if you do have an inside track, is that what you're hearing, a big name coach?
Interesting.
I'm absolutely fine but thanks for the suggestion.I don't remember a single thing you've called right.
But regardless, you need to chill.
OK thanks, not what I wanted to hear but not surprised at all. If we aren't getting a fresh modern hockey mind behind the bench, I at least hope it's a hard ass that demands his players be in condition and give a full 60. Black and Blue Shirts 2.0.I've mentioned some names I know about.
This part is my speculation though: Drury knows what the orders were from Dolan and based on those marching orders I personally am skeptical that he would potentially risk his job on a lesser known person where the move can be second guessed. He was here through the Quinn tenure and all the questions about an NHL rookie coach. That thought process is consistent with what I have heard regarding the names. I am really hoping Mollie is wrong about lavy. That's the first I heard of him and Bruce would make no sense as a noted players coach.
I'm absolutely fine but thanks for the suggestion.
I personally think this group needs something to shake them bc there is a fracture even within the core group. The team either needs a significant move to alter the personality of the team (people know my thoughts on panarin at this point) or a crack the whip coach that demands accountability which is hard to find now, but that would crack the entitlement within the team. Someone who isn't scared of benching players and removing them from their pp time or cookies if they aren't willing to adjust as needed.OK thanks, not what I wanted to hear but not surprised at all. If we aren't getting a fresh modern hockey mind behind the bench, I at least hope it's a hard ass that demands his players be in condition and give a full 60. Black and Blue Shirts 2.0.
That article makes me want to punch a hole through stucco.Mostly conjecture but the latest from Staple