I think our PP has been struggling and Keefe has been looking for an answer. He tried Sandin earlier in the season too and yet went back to Rielly, why would that be if Sandin was such an instant improvement?
Hes also kept Thornton on the PP for god knows how long. Do you agree that Thornton belongs there? Or can we only use coaching choices when we agree with the decision?
I can only use the facts I have. The facts are that Riles has been a top producer on the PP for a long time. Sandin scored a goal in the last game.
Riles has been a solid producer for a long time, far and away our best overall defenseman consistently for years.
Rielly has consistently been a solid playoff performer.
Rielly is drafted and developed by this team and has been here through good and bad.
I get some people don't like him. I get he struggled at the end of the season. I'll argue his faults and strengths but it has to be a real conversation based on what he brings and not some 10 game sample. If you're constantly downplaying and discrediting his strengths and accomplishments while pretending we can replace him without issue, there is no discussion to be had.
Not necessarily saying it's what you're trying to do but some of the comments in this thread do certainly come off as hot takes based on one game.