Whitecloud hit on Knies | Knies did not return to the game.

DearDiary

🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
Aug 29, 2010
15,199
12,543
Knies should know better than to skate hunched over and then lowering himself right before contact. The most you could argue is that Whitecloud had time to realize how vulnerable Knies was.
 

geebster

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 26, 2019
2,076
3,226
View attachment 933508
On contact, Knies' head moves first and independently from his body. No matter what, this is a penalty.
That's not the rule though. It has to be main point to contact AND avoidable. Avoidable has 3 different considerations. I posted a longform response in this thread going through each one but overall it's not avoidable head contact unless you are super charitable about it and say Whiteclouds body moving up into the hit was a body extension specifically done to target/"pick" the head. I wish it was against the rules but it isn't.
 

2014nyr

Registered User
Jun 14, 2014
2,806
3,110
That's it, move the goal posts

You are the one that blamed Knies for skating up ice while carrying the puck 'hunched forward'

That's how you f***ing skate forward

He had his head down and looked up too late

Had nothing to do with being hunched forward

if a player carries it through the neutral zone with their head down...they should expect to get their doors blown off. the hit was square through the center of his body...you can't skate head first into a hit and complain about your head getting hit. you have to expect that, or worse, to be the result if you carry through the neutral zone with your head down. if you get casual with respecting that threat, eventually there's a reminder.

if people want to watch players skate around staring at their feet without any concerns of being yardsaled, they created roller hockey for that.
 

1989

Registered User
Aug 3, 2010
10,482
4,147
View attachment 933508
On contact, Knies' head moves first and independently from his body. No matter what, this is a penalty.

The things this clip's angle clarifies perfectly is that Whitecloud did not leave his feet and that his arm was textbook tucked in the entire way, as well as the hit being entirely north-south - as is, there is no clipping or picking of the head but clearly a hit through to the body where the head is.

By this metric I would not expect any suspension based on Knies' body position because by the rules of the NHL as this is allowable head contact.

Whether one likes the hit or not is subjective but I just don't see how it is decried as illegal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Ratsreign and um

f7ben

Registered User
Mar 25, 2018
2,885
931
Beautiful hit , exactly what we need more of in the league. If the millionaire whiners on the ice don’t want to get hit they should pick a non contact game or learn how not to put themselves in vulnerable positions.

I hate the Knights and I hate the NHL officiating and Dops but this they got right. Should state I also hate the leafs lol
 

hirawl

Used Register
Dec 27, 2010
3,379
1,475
Straight through the core therefore clean. Unfortunately sometimes the head is also caught with a clean hit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: um

1989

Registered User
Aug 3, 2010
10,482
4,147
Straight through the core therefore clean. Unfortunately sometimes the head is also caught with a clean hit.
I would argue that any hit with head contact can be described as dirty, but it doesn't make it illegal under current NHL rules. Or, for better explanation - dirty or clean is a subjective moral interpretation which is not defined by written rules.

I 100000% have no idea where the people saying there was an elbow to the head are seeing it. Even the still photos show Whitecloud has his elbow tucked prior to any impact.
 

Peasy

Registered User
May 25, 2012
17,789
16,828
Star Shoppin
Feel like its pretty similar to Reaves hit.

Right on that line of good/clean hit. Since Reaves got 5 games plus tossed out of the game he was in, Whitecloud should get at least some games but I'm not holding my breath.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Hanging Jowl

Canada4Gold

Registered User
Dec 22, 2010
43,053
9,239
Nowhere near as bad as Reaves but Reaves hit was awful and deserved more than he got probably. Those type of hits have nothing to do with hockey, just picking someone head off. Throw the book at whoever does that.

There was clear head contact here and it was violently the first point of contact(partially due to Knies posture with his head down, he needs to know better). However he did have full body contact. I think it's a little bit predatory due to the fact that he's rising into his head as he makes contact. He timed it well enough that his skates stayed on the ice until contact so it's not charging, but IMO it was reckless. Knows Knies is a bit bent over and instead of trying to get only the body he willingly rising into the hit with his shouler at Knies head height. I don't think it's a suspension, but I think 5 and a game would be reasonable. 2 Minutes at worst. I don't think it's clean.
 

All Mod Cons

Registered User
Sep 7, 2018
11,375
12,235
I don't think this is suspension worthy under the current ruleset. I also think that:
1. It should be
2. If a Leafs player committed the same hit there would be a hearing and probable 1-2 game suspension
More than 1-2 guaranteed. That's a min 3 gamer.
 

All Mod Cons

Registered User
Sep 7, 2018
11,375
12,235
I will say though, it is mad how often a Leafs player gets injured, and misses a significant amount of time, without even a 2 min penalty being assessed. Knies has already gone through the same thing with the Bennett incident.
 

thusk

Registered User
Jul 15, 2011
4,480
2,342
Chicoutimi
no the same thing as read but the moment you jump to make that kind of hit, 100% no doubt than your goal was to hit high ( head) and should had been a major penalty no question about it.

I don't know how you can reverse a call on this one, primary point of contact is the head and the player did everything he could to hit the head...
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Hanging Jowl

Warden of the North

Ned Stark's head
Apr 28, 2006
46,735
22,592
Muskoka
I don't think it's very comparable to Reaves, but it definitely deserves the 5 minute major. He left his feet.

The fact the Leafs ended up on a PK is embarrassing to the league.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ashs

hatterson

Registered User
Apr 12, 2010
36,612
14,138
North Tonawanda, NY
The Reeves hit is a dumb comparison because of the from the side nature of the hit that meant Reeves picked Nurses head.

Conversely, on this hit, the direction of contact was basically through center of mass.

The issue here is the upwards launch of the hitter. He crouches low before the hit and then explodes upwards just before the hit.

However, the NHL has repeatedly taken the viewpoint that as long as your skates are still touching the ice at the moment of contact, even if only by a hair, then it doesn’t count as jumping into a hit.

I think that’s a ridiculous approach as it’s fairly easy for a player to lean *into* a hit instead of jumping upwards, and launching upwards dramatically increases the chance of a head injury, but that’s what the NHL has said.

To be clear, I understand that players leaning into a hit won’t eliminate all head contact, and it’s still possible that someone in a position like Knies could take a big hit that has a lot of head contact. My point is that the NHL should be looking to eliminate actions that unnecessarily increase head contact, which is what happened here.
 

All Mod Cons

Registered User
Sep 7, 2018
11,375
12,235
I don't think it's very comparable to Reaves, but it definitely deserves the 5 minute major. He left his feet.

The fact the Leafs ended up on a PK is embarrassing to the league.
I don't think the league feel embarrassed at all. They clearly have no time for the Leafs and there is a recurring theme of punishing the Leafs at every opportunity.

I wouldn't be shocked at all, if later today we hear that Grebenkin receives a fine for his hit on Theodore.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: OddyOh and Laus723

Mitch nylander

One of the biggest fans from a bipolar fanbase
Jun 2, 2016
4,678
6,319
My problem with this hit is that the head contact is avoidable if he doesn't leave his feet. Instead he explodes, and gets nothing but head.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ashs

Laus723

Graceful brutality
Sponsor
Jan 27, 2006
32,193
7,131
Wellington, FL
So did Nurse. Still resulted in 5 and a game plus an additional 5 games. Leafs fans know not to expect anything from Parros on this hit.
Always the victims. Genuinely curious, what did the Leafs do to the League that has them on the wrong end of everything?

Wouldn't classify what Bennett did as a hit but you do you.
I know, he went full WWE on the poor lad.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad