Where do the Rangers go from here?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Neil Racki

Registered User
May 2, 2018
5,281
5,728
Baltimore-ish
They re-tool a bit, add another Trocheck type .. then hope one of their runs over the next 2-3 years ends up being magical.

They have a winning core and a top end goalie ... sometimes you gotta lose in the conf finals one year to win it the next year.
 

Megustaelhockey

"I like hockey" in Spanish
Apr 29, 2011
22,729
16,435
Lol


A one time 50 goal scorer


So you think he is seriously going to end up with 70 or more😂


Not a high bar since you are the only original 6 franchise that doesn’t even have a 500 goal scorer. Hell Joe Pavelskis sharks tenure would be second all time in New York.

There are teams 60 years younger that have a higher all time goal scorer the bar for New York is really that low as a franchise


He has 304 goals and is 33 calm down junior


Pavelski has over 1,000pts Kreider has 550 he isn’t getting another 500 pts in 5 years. Kreider is maybe a borderline hall of famer for the rangers hall of fame (having incredibly low standards help his case)

But the nhl hall of fame he doesn’t sniff it.
The Toronto Maple Leafs also do not have a 500 goal scorer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandiblesofdoom

Peltz

Registered User
Oct 4, 2019
3,742
5,242
This isn't accurate at all. The Rangers didn't get a chance to develop many high draft picks because Sather was trading away 1st rounders like candy, but as far as development goes, there's a plethora of NHL players that had or are having long NHL careers that were developed in-house.

D Moore, Dubinsky. Callahan. Anisimov. Sauer (injury). Stepan. Hagelin, Staal. Girardi. Del Zotto. Vesey, Kreider, McDonagh, Zuccarello, Fast, Talbot, JT Miller, Hayes, Buchnevich, Pionk, Georgiev, Skjei, Howden, Lindgren, Chytil, Laf, K'Miller. If you want to not include a guys like McD and Lindgren because they weren't drafted by us -- fine. But suggesting the Rangers haven't had success developing players is an asinine, short sighted statement.
It’s wild that we never got a truly amazing center though. Stepan was the best one in like… two decades. Maybe longer?

JT Miller is on your list, but he really doesn’t count considering he didn’t hit his stride until two teams later after they traded him.
 

robertocarlos

Registered User
Sep 19, 2014
26,344
14,031
All teams need to get rid of players who do poorly in the playoffs. Don't care if they are 40 goal scorers or Vesina winners, they need to be gone.
 

Bank Shot

Registered User
Jan 18, 2006
11,731
7,532
All teams need to get rid of players who do poorly in the playoffs. Don't care if they are 40 goal scorers or Vesina winners, they need to be gone.
That's kind of shortsighted. Datsyuk didn't do great his first few playoff runs, but Detroit never would have won another Cup without him.
 

Kupo

MAFIA, MOUNT UP!
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2017
11,709
24,938
Stamford CT
JT Miller is on your list, but he really doesn’t count considering he didn’t hit his stride until two teams later after they traded him.
He 100% counts as a player we developed. Drafted by us, spent time in Hartford and NY, had back to back 20+ goal seasons. Just because he didn’t hit his peak here doesn’t mean he wasn’t a forward we developed.
 

ColbyChaos

I am a made up country
Sep 27, 2017
6,521
6,989
Will County
This isn't accurate at all. The Rangers didn't get a chance to develop many high draft picks because Sather was trading away 1st rounders like candy, but as far as development goes, there's a plethora of NHL players that had or are having long NHL careers that were developed in-house.

D Moore, Dubinsky. Callahan. Anisimov. Sauer (injury). Stepan. Hagelin, Staal. Girardi. Del Zotto. Vesey, Kreider, McDonagh, Zuccarello, Fast, Talbot,
Once again when it comes to drafting and development if you have to point to a bunch of retired players drafted 20 or more years ago (with Moore being drafted back in 2000 lol) as a way to prove you have good drafting and development then your argument is pretty shit.

You could post as good of a list if not better from literally any team with a 20 year timeframe

JT Miller, Hayes, Buchnevich, Pionk, Georgiev, Skjei, Howden, Lindgren, Chytil, Laf, K'Miller. If you want to not include a guys like McD and Lindgren because they weren't drafted by us -- fine. But suggesting the Rangers haven't had success developing players is an asinine, short sighted statement.
Rangers development is so great that Miller and Buchnevich went from middle 6 players to becoming first line forwards the moment they joined a different team.

Hayes did 4 years in college and didn’t develop past what he did his rookie year.

Won’t question New Yorks ability to produce goalies that is the one thing they have been consistently good at.
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
23,881
15,555
Once again when it comes to drafting and development if you have to point to a bunch of retired players drafted 20 or more years ago (with Moore being drafted back in 2000 lol) as a way to prove you have good drafting and development then your argument is pretty shit.

You could post as good of a list if not better from literally any team with a 20 year timeframe


Rangers development is so great that Miller and Buchnevich went from middle 6 players to becoming first line forwards the moment they joined a different team.

Hayes did 4 years in college and didn’t develop past what he did his rookie year.

Won’t question New Yorks ability to produce goalies that is the one thing they have been consistently good at.
A lot of players take time to mature. Snd it’s not always the team that drafted them that sees the player finally figure everything out and become a high end guy. Rangers have Lafreniere figuring it out early. But then there are Kakko and Chytle who need more time. Can they afford to wait for those two or do they move them for older guys who are fully developed even if a bit lower ceiling?
 

AirGut

Registered User
Jul 1, 2019
2,222
2,953
Larry Brooks Bus Stop
puckpedia.com
the problems stem from the blue-line out, so fix the blue-line, upgrade the blue-line, it's not f***ing nuclear physics. If Miller &/or Schneider took the next step I think the series would've at least been 7. Rangers had a mind f*** level of defensive woes come into play this spring.

with a Hanifin, or an Ekholm, or a Forsling, AND a healthy Fox, Rangers would be much better off
 

SeanAveryTheGreatOne

Registered User
Jul 4, 2021
741
1,476
1) NHL’s all time leader in playoff goals when facing elimination
2) greatest net front presence of his generation (some will try to make a case for pavelski)
3) 50 goal scorer
4) 48 career playoff goals and counting, likely finishes his career top 20 in playoff goals all time
5) currently 3rd all time in goals in NYR franchise history, likely takes #2 spot next season and good chance he becomes NYR all time leading scorer if he plays his next 3 years with NYR

How many 400 goal scorers with playoff performance to back it arent in the hall?

If he plays as long as pavelski which his game will likely allow him to do, he easily will surpass 450 goals and even get close to 500.

So yeah, calling him a borderline hall of famer is warranted.
I love Kreider and respect where you're coming from, but he needs to win some hardware (preferably a Cup). You'd have a much stronger case had he won the Rocket Richard that 52-goal year.
 

Kupo

MAFIA, MOUNT UP!
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2017
11,709
24,938
Stamford CT
Once again when it comes to drafting and development if you have to point to a bunch of retired players drafted 20 or more years ago (with Moore being drafted back in 2000 lol) as a way to prove you have good drafting and development then your argument is pretty shit.

You could post as good of a list if not better from literally any team with a 20 year timeframe


Rangers development is so great that Miller and Buchnevich went from middle 6 players to becoming first line forwards the moment they joined a different team.

Hayes did 4 years in college and didn’t develop past what he did his rookie year.

Won’t question New Yorks ability to produce goalies that is the one thing they have been consistently good at.
You claimed the Rangers don’t have a good history of developing players, so I looked at the last 15 years or so to see if that claim was true. It wasn’t. What did you want me to do? Look at the last 3 years? Derp?

Buch was our top line RW and produced like one his last season here. JTM struggled up and down TB’s lineup his first year and a half there so you’re wrong. Again. They were both good players that were drafted and developed in NY that improved as they matured into the players they are today. That’s what players do. They tend to get better.

You obviously have some issue with the Rangers because you’re not posting any facts here.

If you want to make an accurate statement about their development, it’s that the Rangers have issues developing high end forwards, and that’s understandable considering the lack of high end picks they’ve had in franchise history. As well as drafting two, maybe 3 notable busts in recent history with Andersson, Kravtsov, and Kakko who’s been straight up ass.
 

LaffyTaffy13

Registered User
May 10, 2022
1,601
2,657
If you have to pull up a draft from 15 years ago to show your point then that says a lot about how bad your argument is. Also Kreider being a borderline hall of famer is a massive L take.

I guess the standards for New York have sure dropped if you’re already calling Laf and his 50 pts a superstar and Kreider is a borderline hall of famer despite never even having a single PPG season.

Edmonton, New Jersey, Florida, Vegas, Carolina, Colorado, Vancouver, Toronto

Then you go into teams with a lot of young talent that can improve a lot over the next 5 years that already look like they have a lot of promising prospects including Minnesota, Anaheim, Arizona/Utah,

New York is gonna be stuck with Panarin, Kreider, Mika, Kreider all having no move clauses so might as well put an end to your wet dreams of Theodore, Draisaitl, Boeser, and others flocking to New York
Is edmonton in better shape? Nope. What if they lose draisaitl? They have no goalie and currently own the worst contract in hockey.

New jersey in better shape with their plethora of 5’9 155 players? What has the playoffs shown us. Big, heavy and solid goaltending wins. None of which they have.

Florida: in good shape, but better than nyr? Whos their goalie at the end of bobs deal? Will they be able to afford reinhart and mantour? Will they be able to afford bennett and verhage next summer?

Vegas: LOL. Old roster with nothing in the pipeline

Carolina: LOL, you must not understand their contract situation

Colorado: solid shape if they can resign rantenen

Vancouver: lets see how free agency goes and how that petersson deal ages

Toronto: LOL
 

Kupo

MAFIA, MOUNT UP!
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2017
11,709
24,938
Stamford CT
Igor was already 24 and played numerous seasons in the KHL no development was done by NY for him.
One of the dumbest things I have read on this board, and I’ve been reading these boards from when they were hockeyboards and fanhome.

What you’re saying here is when Igor came to NY, he was a finished product. Benoit Allaire, one of the greatest NHL goalie coaches of all time, didn’t help develop his game at all. Same applies for Lundqvist since he was a similar age as Igor when he made his debut here. Yet, both players go out of their way to credit Benny for improving every aspect of their game. I guess f*** what they say. You obviously know better than them. Right? 🤡

You shit on the Rangers for not developing both goalies because they were already in their mid 20’s before they started playing the best hockey in their career, but also discredit the Rangers at the same time with guys like JTM and Buch, who started doing the same at a similar age.

You’re all over the place. Even Devils fans who have a god given right to hate us don’t post nonsense like this.
 

ZachaFlockaFlame

Registered User
Aug 24, 2020
15,777
20,878
Is edmonton in better shape? Nope. What if they lose draisaitl? They have no goalie and currently own the worst contract in hockey.

New jersey in better shape with their plethora of 5’9 155 players? What has the playoffs shown us. Big, heavy and solid goaltending wins. None of which they have.

Florida: in good shape, but better than nyr? Whos their goalie at the end of bobs deal? Will they be able to afford reinhart and mantour? Will they be able to afford bennett and verhage next summer?

Vegas: LOL. Old roster with nothing in the pipeline

Carolina: LOL, you must not understand their contract situation

Colorado: solid shape if they can resign rantenen

Vancouver: lets see how free agency goes and how that petersson deal ages

Toronto: LOL

Lmao, you guys lost in 2023 with a .930 Shesterkin v Akira Schmid. Quit yapping.
 

NJ DevLolz

The Many Saints of Newark
Sep 30, 2017
4,713
5,655
Igor hasn't developed well?
Fox hasnt been developed well?
Laff hasnt been developed well?
Schneider hasnt been developed well?
Kandre hasnt been developed well?
Will cuylle hasnt been developed well?
Chris kreider wasnt developed well?
a 6th round pick who had trouble skating and was 6’8 240 cracking an nhl lineup at age 21 hasnt been developed well?

The funny thing is you are having a tough time answering my original question. Because while there are some teams in better position for the next 5 years than NYR, the list if very very very small
Florida
Edmonton
Dallas
NJ
Colorado
Carolina
Toronto
Vegas
 

ZachaFlockaFlame

Registered User
Aug 24, 2020
15,777
20,878
When the rangers didnt have a coach. You guys use that cup as cope for why fitz plan can work.

We got an actual coach and put an actual system in place and dummied you all year. We literally changed your franchise we beat you so bad lol.

Lmao, the same issues popped under Lavi that did under Gallant v Florida. Lavi also had a horror show of a playoffs behind the bench because he decided to play your boy in your avatar for 4 mins instead of getting an actual skater who can make a difference. But keep using the same childish comeback since you have nothing else. You shat on the Devils core as if they didn't beat you the year prior. And the Devils got dummied? They lost 3 1 goal games prior to empty nets goals being scored :laugh::laugh: Enjoy your regular seasons since you can't do anything come playoffs
 

Megustaelhockey

"I like hockey" in Spanish
Apr 29, 2011
22,729
16,435
When the rangers didnt have a coach. You guys use that cup as cope for why fitz plan can work.

We got an actual coach and put an actual system in place and dummied you all year. We literally changed your franchise we beat you so bad lol.
Dude, you really have to stop talking. You're making it way too easy for people here.
 

Mr Positive

Cap Crunch Incoming
Nov 20, 2013
38,010
18,946
They are a great team that was impacted by injuries. But perhaps they feel to win the cup they need something


maybe they'd take a Vegas approach and do one or two ruthless moves to make a major shakeup
 

Jersey Fresh

Video Et Taceo
Feb 23, 2004
26,904
9,912
T.A.
One of the dumbest things I have read on this board, and I’ve been reading these boards from when they were hockeyboards and fanhome.

What you’re saying here is when Igor came to NY, he was a finished product. Benoit Allaire, one of the greatest NHL goalie coaches of all time, didn’t help develop his game at all. Same applies for Lundqvist since he was a similar age as Igor when he made his debut here. Yet, both players go out of their way to credit Benny for improving every aspect of their game. I guess f*** what they say. You obviously know better than them. Right? 🤡

You shit on the Rangers for not developing both goalies because they were already in their mid 20’s before they started playing the best hockey in their career, but also discredit the Rangers at the same time with guys like JTM and Buch, who started doing the same at a similar age.

You’re all over the place. Even Devils fans who have a god given right to hate us don’t post nonsense like this.
The Rangers had absolutely zero to do with Shesterkin’s development, what are you talking about. The guy was 24 when he came over and had already put up a .935 sv% over 6 years in the KHL.

That’s like trying to give the Angels batting coach credit for Shohei Ohtani lol
 
Last edited:

Kupo

MAFIA, MOUNT UP!
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2017
11,709
24,938
Stamford CT
The Rangers had absolutely zero to do with Shesterkin’s development, what are you talking about. The guy was 24 when he came over and had already put up a .935 sv% over 6 years in the KHL.
There is no edict from god that says players do not continue developing in their mid 20's. Shesterkin may have come here already being a good goalie - but that doesn't mean Allaire didn't further develop various aspects of his game. The purpose of that post though wasn't to highlight that, but rather to point out the other posters double standards.
 

LaffyTaffy13

Registered User
May 10, 2022
1,601
2,657
Lmao, the same issues popped under Lavi that did under Gallant v Florida. Lavi also had a horror show of a playoffs behind the bench because he decided to play your boy in your avatar for 4 mins instead of getting an actual skater who can make a difference. But keep using the same childish comeback since you have nothing else. You shat on the Devils core as if they didn't beat you the year prior. And the Devils got dummied? They lost 3 1 goal games prior to empty nets goals being scored :laugh::laugh: Enjoy your regular seasons since you can't do anything come playoffs
Lavi had a horror show of a playoffs? Haha can you explain how? The rangers got to the ECF and losing the series 4-2 to what will be the cup champs in 6 one goal games, 3 OT games.

Lavi did a heckuva job
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ZachaFlockaFlame
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad