When does the Yzerplan start getting criticized?

SMP17

Registered User
Apr 1, 2023
35
26
mediocre players. wings committed $25m+ for multiple seasons just to become a lower end bubble team. i dont get the point of that.
Because they are never hitting 50 points in a season, this isn’t really hard to comprehend. Trading 5% in the draft lottery isn’t worth screwing the core players out of some support to actually hang in games with.
 

dirtydanglez

Registered User
Oct 30, 2022
5,439
5,494
This team has improved this year, in spite of not having guys like Bert and Vrana. They have better systems and PK. Even PP, though that's where you can see the lack of high end talent. They showed resilience in coming from behind.

Yzerman also had to re-sgn Larkin, which may have been harder to do after another abysmal season that results in a 4th overall pick at best.

They had a decent step forward as a team, now pulled the rip cord to improve draft position.

People can't seem to accept that when the wings were legit worst in the league they got screwed by the lottery in what was already a pretty thin draft. That doesn't mean you should tank forever in hopes of winning the lottery with a generational talent.
buying a team doesnt make a bottom feeder a competitor again. if detroit wants to be better its going to have to be through the draft.

Because they are never hitting 50 points in a season, this isn’t really hard to comprehend. Trading 5% in the draft lottery isn’t worth screwing the core players out of some support to actually hang in games with.
i disgree. if detroit sat out of the free agent market they would still be at the bottom.
 

Lazlo Hollyfeld

The jersey ad still sucks
Sponsor
Mar 4, 2004
29,860
29,617
buying a team doesnt make a bottom feeder a competitor again. if detroit wants to be better its going to have to be through the draft.
Agreed. But people seem to think that continuing to try to suck as much as possible while you hope to win generational talent is a feasible option.

It's a tired argument that has been thoroughly dismantled.
 

dirtydanglez

Registered User
Oct 30, 2022
5,439
5,494
Agreed. But people seem to think that continuing to try to suck as much as possible while you hope to win generational talent is a feasible option.

It's a tired argument that has been thoroughly dismantled.

imo it's better option than drafting 10th-14th every year and buying depth players in free agency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fantomas

SMP17

Registered User
Apr 1, 2023
35
26
buying a team doesnt make a bottom feeder a competitor again. if detroit wants to be better its going to have to be through the draft.


i disgree. if detroit sat out of the free agent market they would still be at the bottom.
Then you apparently disregarded half of these posts and the fact that they had 74 points last season with plugs in their lineup. Living in a dream world.
 

Czechboy

Češi do toho!
Apr 15, 2018
27,478
24,734
Before the season: I trust Stevie Y and he'd be my first choice as GM
Today: I don't know anymore - Of the 4 Czechs - he kept Zadina and Kubalik over Vrana and Hronek
 

Osakahaus

Chillin' on Fuji
May 28, 2021
8,484
4,152
My real answer is that if Cossa isn't the guy, then we finally start to really critique the Yzerplan.
 

tyhee

Registered User
Feb 5, 2015
2,675
2,822
All a general manager that walks into a dumpster fire can do is make good decisions and hope for some good luck as opposed to bad luck. General managers are assigned a fair bit of credit or blame with respect to drafting, but realistically their most important part in the drafting process isn't the part they actually play in making the choice of who to draft but their management of the scouting department and can change the personnel there and have better information accordingly.

When Devellano took over the dumpster fire that was the Red Wings in 1982 his team continued to be terrible for the next four years. His 1985-86 team, his 4th year at the helm, was probably the worst in a long Red Wings history to that time. The team started to look better in Devellano's 5th season.

Yzerman is arguably in a tougher spot than Devellano was. Devellano took over before the salary cap era. Yzerman inherited not only a bad team but a team in the cap era with overpaid veterans that were harder to move than they would have been if there were no salary cap.

No doubt every NHL fan is wondering what it was about Vrana that caused Yzerman to want to dump him and 31 general managers to pass him by when he was placed on waivers, but the fact is 31 general managers passed on him despite his scoring ability. If he works out for the Blues that will be great but it doesn't mean there wasn't a reason that no NHL GM thought him worth a waiver claim.

In my view Yzerman has earned his respect. His drafting, both in Tampa and in Detroit, hasn't been exceptional. He's simply been a guy who makes consistently reasonable decisions, steers clear of making irrational risky decisions and is the sort of general manager that sooner or later will have a good team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cole von cole

TheAngryHank

Expert
May 28, 2008
18,402
6,922
That’s really not something to praise about.
It should be automatic that after 4 years with top 5/10 picks their future should look way better.

Detroits lineup and system lack high end forwards.
Larkin- Raymond- Kasper just isn’t enough in the East
No team has fallen in the draft more than Detroit. Some drafts are better than others also ,
 

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,720
11,285
mediocre players. wings committed $25m+ for multiple seasons just to become a lower end bubble team. i dont get the point of that.

It is called filling out a roster. Copp is overpaid just slightly, and Chiarot actually helped us be worse than we could of. It is also called not wanting to lose 5-1 and 6-2 like we did a lot last year as Steve said in his presser after signing these guys. Any young prospects on your team getting shelled every night is how you make them worse players and kill their confidence.

Even without them, we weren't beating out any of the bottom 5-6 teams in the race to this years bottom. We would have had to not play Larkin and Seider for most of this season to achieve that level of bottoming out. Also, even if we did that, we could still not land Bedard. One of the other top players available is Michkov who won't be in the NHL until 26-27 when his KHL deal ends, which means we could end up with not a lot better a player than we are going to get anyhow. Outside the top 3 or 4 guys, the next 10-20 are all similar, which is where we were set to draft for most of this season.

A few seasons ago we were 20 pts worse than the 2nd last team in the league and we fell to 4th and had to get lucky that we ended up with at worst no worse a player than #1 Rangers got. Without lottery luck, there isn't much rebuilding teams can do to accelerate a rebuild. Rebuilding teams are not high traffic landing spots for key UFA's and even good RFA's, which means Copp level players it is for now until we get a little better.

If you never add any good talent to the team, it also lets other UFA's know maybe you aren't serious about improving. Maybe in a year or two, better UFAs will want to be here again.

imo it's better option than drafting 10th-14th every year and buying depth players in free agency.

We are drafting 7-11 this year though. Like I said, Larkin and Seider would have had to sit for 60% of our games, for us to be down in the standings with how bad, SJ, CBJ, Ana, MTL and Chi have been.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cole von cole

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,720
11,285
Before the season: I trust Stevie Y and he'd be my first choice as GM
Today: I don't know anymore - Of the 4 Czechs - he kept Zadina and Kubalik over Vrana and Hronek

Kuablik is just a stop gap guy anyway and Zadina is all but gone this summer. Yzerman was working on trading him at the deadline already. I wasn't happy to see Hronek dealt, but Vrana has/had non hockey issues here, so that wasn't a we need to trade him cause he sucks move.
 

Neutrinos

Registered User
Sep 23, 2016
8,946
3,845
Yzerman's decision to commit long term salary to veterans like Copp and Chiarot should be criticized, as should his decision to keep Perron and Kubalik beyond the trade deadline

The team just didn't have the necessary pieces in place to justify aggressively pulling the chute on the rebuild and trying to compete

This approach was all the more curious given the strength of the upcoming draft
 

GarlicbreadTB

Registered User
Apr 16, 2015
1,066
1,725
As a Red Wing fan I'm pleased for the most part with Yzerman's work so far. The Chiarot contract was a headscratcher, but I don't mind the Copp one too much, think he's been OK this season after struggling with an injury during all of pre season really. I think even if he hadn't brought in the players via free agency, the team wouldn't have been bad enough to be in the tank race IMO. But he saw the way the season was going after those Ottawa games and cut the cloth accordingly and traded Hronek and Bertuzzi which I think was the right move. Think with the likes of Edvinsson and Kasper coming into the team and hopefully some good picks this year and HOPEFULLY some lottery luck could help too will do wonders for the rebuild. We'll see if he'll be aggressive in the summer with free agent signings in what is admitely a weak free agent class, but might explore the trade mark we'll see.
 

Some Other Flame

Registered User
Dec 4, 2010
8,063
10,416
Silly way of looking at things. Detroit was fairly devoid of legit up and coming talent when he took over. And it takes time to build that back up - they're no shortcuts unless you're the Rangers and elite talent is is just dying to play in New York. Add in some poor lottery luck and it's gonna take a bit longer than was probably expected.

But this whole mentality that you can go from bottom feeder to bonafide contender in 5 years or less is inane and outdated. It's probably double that, short of landing a generational talent. Probably one of the reasons why rebuilds keep failing in Canada since that notion is still in vogue and the general impatience to build anything properly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cole von cole

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
29,165
11,307
Silly way of looking at things. Detroit was fairly devoid of legit up and coming talent when he took over. And it takes time to build that back up - they're no shortcuts unless you're the Rangers and elite talent is is just dying to play in New York. Add in some poor lottery luck and it's gonna take a bit longer than was probably expected.

But this whole mentality that you can go from bottom feeder to bonafide contender in 5 years or less is inane and outdated. It's probably double that, short of landing a generational talent. Probably one of the reasons why rebuilds keep failing in Canada since that notion is still in vogue and the general impatience to build anything properly.
Wasn’t much to work with when Yzerman arrived. Honestly, after 4 seasons at the helm only guys who are still around from the Holland led drafts is like Larkin, Lindstrom, maybe a couple of other guys. Basically moved everyone else out. Not going to be many pre 2019 draftees on this wings team in the next 2 seasons.

Have to add some veteran difference makers. Last batch were the guys to help transition from bad team to non playoff team. Now need to add guys to push them into playoff contender status.

They didn’t land a super elite offensive talent. Got a very good minute muncher Dman in Seider. Raymond is a nice winger but you don’t build rosters with just wingers. Evindsson spent
The year in the A. Kasper probably more a 2C. Not sure if Larkin and Kasper as the top 2 C get it done for a contender.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cole von cole

Fantomas

Registered User
Aug 7, 2012
13,662
7,303
Ahh these takes are so bad it’s painful enough to make an account. They had 74 points without these players last season and had no way of becoming 20+ points worse unless they sold off everything to start all over again. Wings are likely to finish around 80 points, with a healthy Bertuzzi and Vrana not having his player assistance issues they‘re in a wildcard spot, not selling at the deadline. Too many with lazy replies and aren’t actually educated on the current state of the team/season.

Who's being lazy? If they don't sign those three players they're a worse team, period. This is not complicated.

Wait, I thought those were bad signings because they're not good players?

But they're also responsible for the 20+ point difference between the Wings and the cellar dwellers?

Also keep in mind Yzerman had no crystal ball to know Vrana and Bertuzzi would be out much of the year. So even jettisoning those three players you named wouldn't have been enough with a healthy roster.

This draft has 4 outstanding players to choose from. You don't even have to win the lottery. You just need to give yourself a shot to get one of the 4. And if you don't you might still get someone like Benson or Smith.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad