Alexander the Gr8
Registered User
What....
What I meant to say is that someone will take a chance on him, one way or another.
What....
What I meant to say is that someone will take a chance on him, one way or another.
At 2.5 M I don't think some teams would. It's a cap world. Wild wouldn't, and they need forward talent...key word being talent. Someone would really have to believe in Yak in order to claim him.
Wanna serve up a quote or link to justify that or just pull it out of your rear end?
What I meant to say is that someone will take a chance on him, one way or another.
I can't see it being Toronto. They have as many or more forward decisions to make than Edmonton already. Also not sure if Babcock would have time for Yak
Kessel as a Leaf might have something to say about that.
Negative. Over the last 4 seasons the +/- looks like this:
Yakupov - 88
Schultz - 71
Stafford - 70
Ristolainen - 68 (in 194 games)
Ennis - 67
Lindholm - 60
Skinner - 60
The first "good" player from a team that doesn't (or didn't) suck is Marleau (which is surprising) at -41. Kessel was -32. Kesler -20.
On the positive side, the top guys were:
Toews +100, Kunitz +86, Marchand +85, Toffoli +84, Kopitar +80.
How about Filppula for Yak? I've heard you guys want a 3rd center. There's your guy. Plus he's only got 2 years left on his deal.
Leafs have first waiver priority given their last place finish last season. They have a healthy stable of Russians and a situation where he could find a role. Not very often a 1st overall is waived this early, why not try?
Straight up for Desharnais
Oh yeah definetly I thought you meant if he clears waivers someone will trade for him
Negative. Over the last 4 seasons the +/- looks like this:
Yakupov - 88
Schultz - 71
Stafford - 70
Ristolainen - 68 (in 194 games)
Ennis - 67
Lindholm - 60
Skinner - 60
The first "good" player from a team that doesn't (or didn't) suck is Marleau (which is surprising) at -41. Kessel was -32. Kesler -20.
On the positive side, the top guys were:
Toews +100, Kunitz +86, Marchand +85, Toffoli +84, Kopitar +80.
That's not unheard of. Sometimes teams won't take a guy on waivers because of salary, but they'll trade for him (after clearing waivers) either because they can send salary back or the team trading a guy will retain salary.
This happened with Jussi Jokinen twice. First, he cleared waivers with Tampa, but then Carolina traded for him by sending salary back (Melichar I think). He had some very productive seasons with Carolina before falling off (a ot of which I think was due to being mis-used under Muller). Canes then waived him, but there were no takers due to his salary so the Canes were able to trade him by retaining some salary.
There are other cases so teams do trade for a guy after clearing waivers.
I say take him and his numbers should increase immensely with him being out of Edmonton.I'd take him in Toronto. Normally even a bust of a first round pick is going to get a second and third chance just because of draft pedigree.
Yeah, but with a player like Yakupov you'd have to think a number of GM's would take a chance on him since it wouldn't cost any assets and they'd be worried that another team would claim him. If a team didn't have room, they'd just put in the claim and make other moves to make it fit.
That being said, you'd have to think that Yak would go to the press box before he'd go to waivers. Waiving him would just be bad asset management by the Oilers. I understand "addition by subtraction", but you could always scratch him and wait for injuries to put him back in the lineup (or injuries to another team that could increase the trade demand for him).
Yakupov's been bad for three seasons now and is apparently having a poor camp..