Fox means nothing in this conversation lol, hes a side piece compared to all these names. Devils are adding Smith who is better anyway
The conversation is about having the better offseason. We don't know how Fox is going to be in the NHL but he was still a top prospect added by NYR during the offseason. You can't say he means nothing and then talk about adding Simmonds. I'm sure 99% of the teams would have preferred to add Fox over Simmonds, regardless which one works our or doesn't. I'm sure Smith is going to be fantastic, but it wasn't an offseason move.
I don't see Shattenkirk as a real negative offseason move. Had he stayed, it would have been 6 million on the cap. He wasn't going to suddenly be used as their main puck-moving D-man. I don't considering too much of a negative on their offseason.
With that said, I'm not sure why their needs to be a pissing contents between 2 teams that had a fantastic offseason. I think overall NYR added more from an offseason standpoint, but NJD have more coming up immediately, along with bringing in the #1 pick.
The Rangers lost Hayes, Zuccarello, Shattenkirk and might lose Kreider. Easily the Devils.
That's not even close to how it works. We traded Hayes and got Trouba. How is that even a negative? We traded Zucc instead of losing him for nothing or keeping him on a contract we can't do. If we Trade Kreider, it's for the same reason. That's like saying NJD may lose Hall so we should hold that against their offseason move. Makes no sense.