I dont think there are any real arguments for Kucherov over Ovy. Like, he would have to get close to 2000 points to even open the conversation, and it's too late for that.
You might be undervaluing Ovy inching up on Gretzky's goal record. The reason I say 2000 points (maybe 1800ish, more realistically), is Kucherov will need some sort of accomplishment to show longevity. I think it's out of reach, really. But he can be 2nd pretty soon.Quite simply a better level of play. Faster, more technical, more intelligent, more collective, more playmaking, more precise shooting. All that remains is the body checking and shooting power for Ovechkin. That's not much.
Arguments of the 2000 points are bogus. Ovechkin will only have 1650 points and regular season points do not determine level but longevity in the league. And it is quite possible that Kucherov will not that far away. He will be well ahead in the play-off points. And the collective prize list is well ahead.
Play-Off is more important than Regular Season. At the slightest physical problem, a player leaves the regular season aside to be ready for the Play-Off. This is what Kucherov did in 2021.
If the goals are not worth more than a second assist it is because it has no more value. The scorer concludes a sequence of play. But those who provoke it have just as much merit.You might be undervaluing Ovy inching up on Gretzky's goal record. The reason I say 2000 points (maybe 1800ish, more realistically), is Kucherov will need some sort of accomplishment to show longevity. I think it's out of reach, really. But he can be 2nd pretty soon.
Attempts dont matter. It's not about percentage. It's about goals.If the goals are not worth more than a second assist it is because it has no more value. The scorer concludes a sequence of play. But those who provoke it have just as much merit.
900 goals in 13,000 attempts is not crazy. And Ovechkin's +/- will be ugly to see next to other great players.
Tampa with Kucherov on the ice will have scored more goals than Washington with Ovechkin.
Playmakers are more impactful in the game than shooters.
Matthews will beat Ovechkin's record unless a serious injury prevents him from doing so, and yet he is less strong than Kucherov.
So add to Ovechkin's totals about 100 points too. His the best secondary assistant is himself.If the goals are not worth more than a second assist it is because it has no more value. The scorer concludes a sequence of play. But those who provoke it have just as much merit.
Attempts dont matter. It's not about percentage. It's about goals.
Now I definitely think you're undervaluing Ovy getting close to Gretzky's goal record.
No disrespect to Matthew's, but the longevity required in chasing Ovy will be tough for him. He doesnt need to be injured to slow down. He just needs to turn 33, or 34, or whatever. Not everybody just refuses to slow down like Ovy did.
?!?So add to Ovechkin's totals about 100 points too. His the best secondary assistant is himself.
Lol look man, there are few people on these boards who are bigger Kucherov supporters than me. But this is crazy talk.Kucherov : Helping these teammates score 100 times is more than scoring 50 times. Efficiency matters a lot. You can spend an entire match taking 10 shots, you'll score more than if you only take 5. But if you only take 5 and allow your teammates to take the shots, they'll score more and your team can score more goals. The mission is for the team to win, not for you to end up with more goals than the others.
McDavid, Kucherov, McKinnon, Matthews will play in the NHL until they are 38-40 years old. This is very common among elite players.
In any case this year, Matthews has moved ahead and should increase his lead next year. His ceiling per season is much higher (70 vs 50)
?!?
Arguments of the 2000 points are bogus. Ovechkin will only have 1650 points and regular season points do not determine level but longevity in the league. And it is quite possible that Kucherov will not that far away. He will be well ahead in the play-off points. And the collective prize list is well ahead.
Play-Off is more important than Regular Season. At the slightest physical problem, a player leaves the regular season aside to be ready for the Play-Off. This is what Kucherov did in 2021.
Team
2X NHL Champion & 2X East Champion
vs
1X NHL Champion
Individual
2 Hart & 2 Art Ross & X2 Assist Leader
vs
3 Hart & 1 Art Ross & 1 Smythe & 9 Rockets
Stats points
Best PPG
Better +:-
Best top seasons (even correlated with the number of goals per game)
Best play-off masterpiece (maybe since Gretzky's gang... to check at the end of career)
vs
more goals
Game
Skills
Q.I
Skating
Playmaking
vs
Charge
The interesting thing is - if you add up the votes for the Conn Smythe in 2020 and 2021, Kucherov has more than any of his teammates. One could argue that he was the most valuable Lightning player during their back-to-back wins, even if he wasn't the most value in either playoff run on a standalone basis.Make no mistake about it, history will absolutely record that Kucherov is missing a Conn Smythe.
Ovechkin isn't on McDavid/Crosby tier. He may have looked like it for a while, but he hasn't been remotely close to that standard after turning 25.Eh, Playoffs are a hard give for Kucherov as he only won in the watered down COVID bubble seasons... in regular playoffs he hasn't been able to get it done.
Ovechkin might only have one run but that ended with a Conn Smythe something Kucherov will never have.
Not trying to hate on Kucherov but trying to put him in a McDavid/Ovi/Crosby tier is pushing it.
He more a Kane/Malkin level
What's crazy? That 100 assists is much more impactful than 50 goals?Lol look man, there are few people on these boards who are bigger Kucherov supporters than me. But this is crazy talk.
Ovechkin isn't on McDavid/Crosby tier. He may have looked like it for a while, but he hasn't been remotely close to that standard after turning 25.
So now Ovechkin has the level of Crosby and even more so McDavid...Eh, Playoffs are a hard give for Kucherov as he only won in the watered down COVID bubble seasons... in regular playoffs he hasn't been able to get it done.
Ovechkin might only have one run but that ended with a Conn Smythe something Kucherov will never have.
Not trying to hate on Kucherov but trying to put him in a McDavid/Ovi/Crosby tier is pushing it.
He more a Kane/Malkin level
No. Crosby is above in all areas of play.Eh to be fair Crosby isn't really on McDavids level either.
Ovechkin and Crosby definitely on same level though
I don’t disagree with any of this. Kucherov’s back-to-back 30+ point playoff runs are stuff of legends.The interesting thing is - if you add up the votes for the Conn Smythe in 2020 and 2021, Kucherov has more than any of his teammates. One could argue that he was the most valuable Lightning player during their back-to-back wins, even if he wasn't the most value in either playoff run on a standalone basis.
Yes, totally agreed. The problem with the Conn Smythe is many people view it as an all-or-nothing award. That only tells part of the story.I don’t disagree with any of this. Kucherov’s back-to-back 30+ point playoff runs are stuff of legends.
My tongue-in-cheek comment was in direct response to another poster. Context matters.
You can’t just subtract 5 shots from 10, claim those 5 shots wouldn’t have be goals, and then claim that those 5 shots taken by other players will result in goals. This is just nonsense.Kucherov : Helping these teammates score 100 times is more than scoring 50 times. Efficiency matters a lot. You can spend an entire match taking 10 shots, you'll score more than if you only take 5. But if you only take 5 and allow your teammates to take the shots, they'll score more and your team can score more goals. The mission is for the team to win, not for you to end up with more goals than the others.
Look at the number of goals Tampa score with Kucherov.You can’t just subtract 5 shots from 10, claim those 5 shots wouldn’t have be goals, and then claim that those 5 shots taken by other players will result in goals. This is just nonsense.
288.Look at the number of goals Tampa score with Kucherov.
288.
TBL scored 290 and 319 with lower performance from Kuch.
also:
Kuch missed 139 games. Which is a lot in such a short career.
TBL P% with Kuch =.639
TBL P% w/o Kuch =.673
So he is just playing on a very very good team, which plays even better without Kucherov.
How can he have 6 Conference Finals and 161 points if it's usual ? Who has done better in the Play-off for 10 years ?Looks like it could be another poor playoffs from Kucherov after a career high regular season
A case could be made for 2021, but Hedman was one of the easiest Connections Smythe winners ever in 2020.What Kucherov needs is longevity.
6 or 7 years close to this level and he could do it.
On the other hand, Kucherov should have had 2 conn-smythe trophies but voters don't like him