KWP
Registered User
Not an unpopular opinion per se but something lots of casual fans might not understand...
Analytics is all about 'entry with possession' and how successful that is relative to dumping it in. (of course you'd prefer to have the puck instead of having to get it back first). What lots of casuals don't realize is there is a compromise, that is if your team elects to try and gain the zone with possession more, good chance you'll be giving up your zone with possession more the other way.
dumping the puck in and managing it (getting it behind the opposition) forces them to go ~200 feet each time and lets you establish your neutral zone forecheck if you can't recover the puck and avoids turnovers and transition chances. Boston and St Louis has 2 of the highest dump in rates and were 2 of the best defensive teams in the league.
A team like the Blackhawks had one of the highest rates of making plays into the zone but also had the worst rate the other way. Same with Ottawa.
Obviously you're more likely to generate a chance when you can control the puck when crossing the blue line (duh) but the value of it in the grand scheme and over the long haul isn't as valualbe as led to believe.
I cannot stand "dump & chase" hockey but your point is well taken. As a fan tho. the high risk high reward entry (w/ possession), I'll take that over "turn the dman & race the puck" for sure.
(And believe me, us Blackhawk nuts know all about brutal goals against average.)
PS - And 5 more seasons of Brent Seabrook's No Movement Clause. Way to go Stanley.