What’s your unpopular hockey opinion?

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/

NoName

Bringer of Playoffs!
Nov 3, 2017
2,842
1,687
That hockey has become too soft overall.
I thought this was supposed to be posting unpopular opinions :naughty:

I miss the big open ice hits and the incredible fights as much as anyone. OTOH I also remember Boogaard and Lindros and guys in other contact sports that are broken down shells at the end of their careers and aren’t even middle aged yet. Even though the viewing experience obviously suffers to a degree, I do think it is worth trading in the Tie Domi style of last generation for the Max Domi style today.

Now the head-snapping bullshit flopping that I see bleeding into the game now as cowardly players try to take advantage of the new emphasis on protecting the head, THAT I hate. Don’t want to see this game turned into soccer where cheating is so ubiquitous it becomes know as “gamesmanship”.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JabbaJabba

NoName

Bringer of Playoffs!
Nov 3, 2017
2,842
1,687
As to my “unpopular” opinion: I think William Nylander’s contract will actually turn out to be a bargain, as he continues to improve his game and as the cap goes up and RFA contracts continue to rise. Makes me think of Leon Draisaitl. We all scoffed at Chia when he handed out that contract but now you can’t argue it isn’t undermarket value for a guy who puts up 50+ goals and 100+ points (yes, even while spending a lot of time with McDavid). I don’t think Nylander hits those heights, but I definitely see 30 goals and 70-80 points in his future, which will make a sub-$7million AAV contract look like a bargain in a few years.



I await my crucifixion in the comments below.
 

lottster14

Registered User
Feb 10, 2019
3,274
1,913
The increase in scoring = bad
There should be a way to watch without commentators. Jim Hughson and Craig Simpson being the main voices of HNIC is just awful
 

frisco

Some people claim that there's a woman to blame...
Sep 14, 2017
3,708
2,810
Northern Hemisphere
Patrick Roy's broken English reply to Roenick with the two Stanley Cup rings in his ears was the most cringe worthy, unfunny hockey quote of all-time.

My Best-Carey
 
  • Like
Reactions: nofehr

illpucks

Registered User
May 26, 2011
20,525
4,974
The increase in scoring = bad
There should be a way to watch without commentators. Jim Hughson and Craig Simpson being the main voices of HNIC is just awful
Jim Hughson would be great in a fantasy game of Canucks vs Canucks
Great save Luongo!
What a save by Lunogo!
Great save Luongo!
Oh What a save by Luongo!
 

illpucks

Registered User
May 26, 2011
20,525
4,974
Jonathan Toews is the best player to ever play the game, and is the best NHL player in its 102 year history.
 

psycat

Registered User
Oct 25, 2016
3,284
1,183
Present hockey is mostly good for falling asleep.
Players, including the stars, are very replacable and honestly should earn about one tenth of what they do. One might aswell watch tier 3 hockey for about the same, sometimes even more, entertainment.

I don't care who wins the cup at all since NHL is just a mercenaries league and it's mostly random anyway. Following storylines of individual players is more engaging.
 

holy

Demigod
May 22, 2017
7,141
11,101
Patrick Roy's broken English reply to Roenick with the two Stanley Cup rings in his ears was the most cringe worthy, unfunny hockey quote of all-time.

My Best-Carey
Yeah, I agree. Would've been much more of a knee slapper if he delivered it in a slick British accent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robsenz and shello

Beauner

Registered User
Jun 14, 2011
13,042
6,145
Pittsburgh
Present hockey is mostly good for falling asleep.
Players, including the stars, are very replacable and honestly should earn about one tenth of what they do. One might aswell watch tier 3 hockey for about the same, sometimes even more, entertainment.

I don't care who wins the cup at all since NHL is just a mercenaries league and it's mostly random anyway. Following storylines of individual players is more engaging.
there's unpopular, then there's this. None of this is even true.
 

Turin

Erik Karlsson is good
Feb 27, 2018
23,660
27,809
Who had the greatest relative careers and who is the best hockey player are entirely different questions.
 

Beauner

Registered User
Jun 14, 2011
13,042
6,145
Pittsburgh
What is not true?

Present hockey is mostly good for falling asleep. That's subjective.
Players, including the stars, are very replacable and honestly should earn about one tenth of what they do. If guys like Kucherov, McDavid and Crosby are replaceable why is no one else doing what they are? If they're replaceable then any random player should be able to score 100 points right? To go along with that, players earn exactly what they should be. Supply and demand. Again, if everyone could score 100 points then the ones that could wouldn't all make multiple millions of dollars. One might aswell watch tier 3 hockey for about the same, sometimes even more, entertainment. Uh, no.

I don't care who wins the cup at all since NHL is just a mercenaries league What? Mercenaries? You want mercenaries, look at the NBA. I don't know how you can possibly call the NHL a mercenaries league when its arguable best player extended long term with a mediocre team with low hope for success in the near term and it's mostly random anyway. Following storylines of individual players is more engaging.
that about covers it
 

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,381
10,905
I came to post quite the opposite:

3v3 is so boring. Better than shootout but that’s a low bar.

So everyone - which one is the unpopular view?

It is only boring if they keep resetting the play and redo their off. setups. Most of the the 3 vs 3 is pretty darn exciting though, and we gets lots of fun close calls and finishes.
 

DitchMarner

TheGlitchintheSwitch
Jul 21, 2017
10,887
7,899
Brampton, ON
Jonathan Toews is the best player to ever play the game, and is the best NHL player in its 102 year history.

This really makes no sense at all (and I find Toews to be underrated by many on this site).

There have been players who have put up better numbers, players who have been more talented, players who have been better defensively and/or more physically imposing, players who have had more team success and players who have achieved more individually. There's simply no basis for declaring Toews the best hockey player ever.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad