Machinehead
HFNYR MVP
They won 39 of 82 games, so yeah, that's a hot one.The 2010 Bruins were the closest thing i will ever see to a "perfect" team
(i hate the bruins btw)
They won 39 of 82 games, so yeah, that's a hot one.The 2010 Bruins were the closest thing i will ever see to a "perfect" team
(i hate the bruins btw)
That's not an advanced stats problem.Advanced stats have become the bane of the hockey community. Apparently there's tons of players in the league who really aren't good at hockey but for some reason they keep getting contracts and ice time.
Edited your post to reflect my unpopular opinionThe 2016 Penguins were the closest thing i will ever see to a "perfect" team
I disagree. Just compare Carolina to SJ. Carolina has won a cup in recent memory yet are a 2nd tier franchise because they rarely make the playoffs.
Compare them to the Sharks who are always competitive and employ elite talent.
I would prefer SJ's success over the past 15 years than Carolina's.
Last season San Jose was 12th in NHL with 97.3% attendance. Carolina was last at 85.2%.San Jose is 21st in attendance and 15th in value, that's pretty second tier. And i'm pretty you would be hard pressed to find anyone who would give up a Cup for any number of Presidents trophies.
Gotta agree with this as a Caps fan formerly without a cup. I felt the same way then.Last season San Jose was 12th in NHL with 97.3% attendance. Carolina was last at 85.2%.
Sharks are 15th in value. Carolina is 5th least.
IMO I rather be a Sharks fan with 20 years of consistent success and elite players vs Carolina with 15 playoff misses in 20 years, constant crap rosters, and 1 stanley cup. Of course, fans of franchises without a SC may have different feelings.
I wouldn’t even call losing in the finals for 20 years straight consistent success, more like consistent failure to win the cup, would much rather have Carolina’s cup.Last season San Jose was 12th in NHL with 97.3% attendance. Carolina was last at 85.2%.
Sharks are 15th in value. Carolina is 5th least.
IMO I rather be a Sharks fan with 20 years of consistent success and elite players vs Carolina with 15 playoff misses in 20 years, constant crap rosters, and 1 stanley cup. Of course, fans of franchises without a SC may have different feelings.
I want more hockey because it’s literally the only thing on Tv I can enjoy. Do you watch lame baseball or somethingThe season is far too long. The season should end in February, the SC Champiion should be decided in April
No on wants to watch hockey in June (or May, for that matter).
I disagree. Just compare Carolina to SJ. Carolina has won a cup in recent memory yet are a 2nd tier franchise because they rarely make the playoffs.
Compare them to the Sharks who are always competitive and employ elite talent.
I would prefer SJ's success over the past 15 years than Carolina's.
Yeah but that's not 2010. We would refer to that as 2011.2010–11 record: 46–25–11
I came to post quite the opposite:The NHL should permanently move to 3v3 hockey.
Only with bad teams. Good offensive teams make 3v3 really fun.I came to post quite the opposite:
3v3 is so boring. Better than shootout but that’s a low bar.
So everyone - which one is the unpopular view?
SJ arena is 25th among all NHL arenas in capacity so using attendance rank is incredibly misleading.San Jose is 21st in attendance and 15th in value, that's pretty second tier. And i'm pretty you would be hard pressed to find anyone who would give up a Cup for any number of Presidents trophies.
I agree with this. 62 game regular season (play each team twice, get rid of divisions and conferences), average 3 games/week (instead of the 3.2 currently). Regular season finishes 5 weeks earlier (end of February), postseason should wrap up late-April/early-May.The season is far too long. The season should end in February, the SC Champiion should be decided in April
No on wants to watch hockey in June (or May, for that matter).
I hate both. Wish they'd do 5 minutes of 4-on-4, 5 minutes of 3-on-3, shootout instead. 3-on-3 was fun for like a month and it's BARELY real hockey.I came to post quite the opposite:
3v3 is so boring. Better than shootout but that’s a low bar.
So everyone - which one is the unpopular view?
Hockey is the best sport ever and the NHL does a **** job of showcasing that fact.
Totally agree, but if the NHL got as high profile as the NFL, would things change for the worse?
I hate both. Wish they'd do 5 minutes of 4-on-4, 5 minutes of 3-on-3, shootout instead. 3-on-3 was fun for like a month and it's BARELY real hockey.