LMFAO
Registered User
- May 20, 2010
- 5,508
- 2,943
The NHL is loosing a part of it's soul by taking fighting out of the game.
On the flip side, I think completely taking fighting and the other goonish things out of hockey would make it 100% better.The NHL is loosing a part of it's soul by taking fighting out of the game.
I disagree with so much here, let me just say: No to the bigger nets, no it's not obvious and inevitable it will happen one day.Make the damn nets bigger. Its honestly not rocket science and obvious why this needs to happen, and its the answer to 90% of the NHLs problems gets fixed with one easy change.
Its just silly to me because it obvious that this will happen one day. And for whatever reason, we are delaying the invetiable. People want to see offence and high level talent go to work, and without fundamentally changing the game (ie going to 4 v4), there is no way to properly curb the size of today's players, and the effectiveness of the systems that coaches are running.
On the flip side, I think completely taking fighting and the other goonish things out of hockey would make it 100% better.
So if someone names Nick Bjugstad as being better than Barkov, is that enough to debunk my statement? No. Three gives multiple chances to get it right.You said he's the best player in the eastern conference so naming just one better is enough to debunk your statement.
Fighting is an alien part of hockey that has nothing to do with putting a puck in the net.
I enjoy the entertainment factor as much as anyone but it really has no business in the sport.
No other sports I can think of allow for bare knuckled boxing in the middle of play for some reason.
+/- while it has its flaws is actually a pretty good representation of a player's defensive ability.
Lacrosse
everyone gets to have an opinion. Personally, I watch to see the skill and whatnot. Some people like the rough stuff. All good. For what it's worth, I don't want to take out the physicality. And if they could actually figure out how to only have real fights when the fighters actually care, at least those one's are entertaining. But I don't know how anyone enjoys two guys just casually agreeing to fight. What I really want to see go away is the garbage between the whistles. If a player is just standing there or trying to skate away and someone punches him, it should be a penalty every time.I completely don't agree...I'm not saying bring the talentless goons back... I think fighting was perfect like 3 years ago. But last season you could clearly see the NHL is slowly trying to get rid of fighting and I don't like it..
everyone gets to have an opinion. Personally, I watch to see the skill and whatnot. Some people like the rough stuff. All good. For what it's worth, I don't want to take out the physicality. And if they could actually figure out how to only have real fights when the fighters actually care, at least those one's are entertaining. But I don't know how anyone enjoys two guys just casually agreeing to fight. What I really want to see go away is the garbage between the whistles. If a player is just standing there or trying to skate away and someone punches him, it should be a penalty every time.
I do think the league is in a bad grey area right now though. The players can't actually police anything, but the league doesn't do it either. The line for how far is too far is so blurry that nobody knows what they can and cannot get away with. Whichever way they go, the league really needs to draw a line.
For what it's worth, I want the rats getting penalized for their shit too. Like I said, it's a shitty grey area right now that really does give the rats too much power/agency. Either the league needs to deal with cheap shit themselves, or they need to let the players do it again. Right now it's neither, and it's obnoxious, kind of embarrassing for the sport with shit like face licking, and it's plain dangerous.I do like the skill but I also hate seeing rats like Tkachuk being little piece of **** because they know they'll get away with it.
I also hate seeing players who were scared for their life to get in a scrum 4 years ago but suddenly grew a pair of balls now that they know they don't have to fight anymore.
Golf is ruining hockey ?The NHL needs to go back to wooden sticks and smaller goalie equipment. Technology is ruining hockey just like golf.
Elaborate? You want less goals? Vastly improved “theory” ie training and systems are what has cut down flashy scoring. That and the talent gap between your average 4th and 1st liners has shrunk significantly (as in the 4th liners are better.)The NHL needs to go back to wooden sticks and smaller goalie equipment. Technology is ruining hockey just like golf.
is there a word that boomers like using more than "entitled"?Players today or spoiled and entitled rich kids who want everything given to them without having to earn it.
Elaborate? You want less goals? Vastly improved “theory” ie training and systems are what has cut down flashy scoring. That and the talent gap between your average 4th and 1st liners has shrunk significantly (as in the 4th liners are better.)
If you removed modern technology/equipment players would skate slower, get injured more, and shoot worse shots... but defense would be so much better than years past.
Composite sticks make scoring easier, any scrub can fire a rocket
is there a word that boomers like using more than "entitled"?
i don't think there's any difference in entitlement levels between "kids today" and previous generations, but what do I know
I completely don't agree...I'm not saying bring the talentless goons back... I think fighting was perfect like 3 years ago. But last season you could clearly see the NHL is slowly trying to get rid of fighting and I don't like it..
John Tavares isn't as elite defensively as everyone think he is