Blue Jays Discussion: :( well it was a hell of a ride

Status
Not open for further replies.

Muston Atthews

Bunch of Bangerz
Jul 2, 2009
32,642
5,008
Toronto, Ontario
I've addressed this already multiple times, as have other posters. I'm sorry if you've failed to understand the points, they weren't terribly hard to interpret.

I get what your saying. KC lineup is built for hitting at Kauffman. They have a bunch of gap hitters and play 1st to 3rd game very well. They run the bases well and while not having tons of power they can hit homers when they move to a small park such as Rogers Centre

The Jays on the other than hit tons of homers at home and in a park like Kaufman those flyball homers are caught on the warning track or have no chance to go out.

Is what you agreed with. We have more XBH in the post season as well as having more doubles in the regular season than the Royals. So technically, the Jays have a bunch of "gap hitters" as well who can also hit the longball, something the Royals struggle to do. I don't see your point at all? The Jays seem to fit Kauffman stadium pretty damn well as well, unless you follow the narrative that all the Jays come up swinging for dingers, which as stats show, isn't true. So while your arrogance is cute, your point makes little sense.
 

TorMapleJays

Registered User
Jun 24, 2012
3,932
2,242
Is what you agreed with. We have more XBH in the post season as well as having more doubles in the regular season than the Royals. So technically, the Jays have a bunch of "gap hitters" as well who can also hit the longball, something the Royals struggle to do. I don't see your point at all? The Jays seem to fit Kauffman stadium pretty damn well as well, unless you follow the narrative that all the Jays come up swinging for dingers, which as stats show, isn't true. So while your arrogance is cute, your point makes little sense.

I disagree.
jays live and die with the long ball. they are most successful when they have a approach and take pitches. when they start trying to hit 5 run shots every at bat, they fail... they also seem to struggle against pitching... good pitching trumps power hitting. No one goes oppo like I do.. remember cola and Donny shouting that......... wll.. its true.. but they got to continue to do this. situational hitting..
 

Muston Atthews

Bunch of Bangerz
Jul 2, 2009
32,642
5,008
Toronto, Ontario
I disagree.
jays live and die with the long ball. they are most successful when they have a approach and take pitches. when they start trying to hit 5 run shots every at bat, they fail... they also seem to struggle against pitching... good pitching trumps power hitting. No one goes oppo like I do.. remember cola and Donny shouting that......... wll.. its true.. but they got to continue to do this. situational hitting..

You disagree with cold, hard facts. That's fine. Not my problem.
 

tml19

Registered User
Nov 30, 2013
2,026
0
Mississauga, Ontario
Apparently runs created by teams that can't hit are called "manufactured runs." On the other end runs created from XBH are worth less then manufactured ones. Did I miss anything? :sarcasm:
 

Finlandia WOAT

No blocks, No slappers
May 23, 2010
24,413
24,684
If they can get through Game 6, I like the Jays chances against Cueto. Although Yost probably won't wait as long if Cueto craps the bed again, with that bullpen and in a Game 7.
 

TootooTrain

Sandpaper
Jun 12, 2010
35,517
477
Houston, now that's a team that is feast or famine in regards to home runs. Next we'll be hearing that home runs are rally killers.
 

Kurtz

Registered User
Jul 17, 2005
10,385
7,465
Why are you presuming that the home run in Toronto has a higher percentage to be a flyout vs. a double in KC than the softly hit ball is a groundout vs. a single? If Toronto is better at longball, wouldn't it make more sense to try to find the gaps there vs playing a style they aren't suited to (never mind a style that didn't just lead them to an historic offense in a 162 game sample size) and then try to find the gaps there?

Or are you just trying to explain why the Jays are currently down 3 games to 2? If that's the case...well, based on what I've seen, your theory has more merit than the "small ball" vs. "long ball" debate I've seen. But this is baseball over a small sample size, it comes off as a bit unrealistic to look at such a small sample size and proclaim "THIS is why the Jays are failing!!".

And didn't the Jays lead the League in godp's? Wouldn't that not be the case if they were partial to making hard contact or no contact at all vs. weak contact?

I'm not sure if the Jays lead the league in GIDP, but you could be right. But it's easier to turn a DP on a hard hit ball to an infielder than on a soft grounder, I think. But that's sort of off-topic and probably merits its own discussion.

I know 5 games in a small sample size, but either it's a benefit to have home field, or it's not, right? The Royals had massively better numbers at home though the entire season, so it's definitely a benefit to them. And again, that's based more on their regular season record than their 4-1 home record thus far in the playoffs.

Even if you disregard the Jays record home/away, and their team composition, it's incredibly difficult to suggest that the Royals don't play much better at home than they do on the road for the reasons already stated.
 

King Mapes

Sub to My YouTube Blocks_4_days
Feb 9, 2008
28,862
1,163
Edmonton
I disagree.
jays live and die with the long ball. they are most successful when they have a approach and take pitches. when they start trying to hit 5 run shots every at bat, they fail... they also seem to struggle against pitching... good pitching trumps power hitting. No one goes oppo like I do.. remember cola and Donny shouting that......... wll.. its true.. but they got to continue to do this. situational hitting..

They live or die with the long ball? They led the league in walks and tied for second in AVG.. While crushing the league in most other offensive categories.
 

King Mapes

Sub to My YouTube Blocks_4_days
Feb 9, 2008
28,862
1,163
Edmonton
Becoming more and more apparent who watches baseball and who doesn't in this thread. :laugh:

No matter what we will have that reputation. People see 40 homerun hitters and say "he always swings for the fences". Look at how much Donaldson got on. EE got off to a slow start then he got on way more as he got more healthy. Bautista's average wasn't as high but what about his walk total? The guy is still patient.
 

Dough72

Registered User
Sep 3, 2008
2,012
829
Zaun is making me paranoid about our guys tipping pitches

partly because I am 100% convinced Stroman did. At least against one guy. He had full count on Morales and threw a curve or change designed to be chased out of the zone and Morales didn't even flinch. Didn't step toward it, didn't more his hands. No way that happens unless he knew right away it would drop out of the zone.
 

Dough72

Registered User
Sep 3, 2008
2,012
829
why doesn't anybody forget the words to anthems anymore?

been waiting all playoffs and it hasn't happened once
 

dredeye

BJ Elitist/Hipster
Mar 3, 2008
27,419
3,071
Great season. Absolutely garbage game. How the **** do you go 0 for 12 with risp in a game that important. The only guy to earn his keep was Bautista. Everyone else was ****ing garbage tonight.

Although, had the garbage umps called the balk we'd be at the very least going into the bottom of the 9th. Horrible horrible horrible way to end the season
 

dubplatepressure

Registered User
Jul 10, 2007
15,979
3,627
Great season. Absolutely garbage game. How the **** do you go 0 for 12 with risp in a game that important. The only guy to earn his keep was Bautista. Everyone else was ****ing garbage tonight.

Agreed. So many stupid, blown calls. Bad pitch calls, no small ball, they did it to themselves. Great season though that comeback last series was amazing.
 

mikebel111*

Guest
This stings but really proud of this team for battling adversity all season. You guys have made Canada proud.
Go Jays Go
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad