Reaper45
Registered User
My only issue with Thompson and Mitchell last night was that they're not very fast. Its was evident last night.
I mean it's not like he ran him, he backed into him when Fleury was out of the crease. I could see calling it if he plowed into him and you as a ref wanted to get a handle on things sure. That was ticky tack to me.Really? It was I think one of those calls you have to make or you risk having that game get truly out of control, all night it was on the edge, scrum here, scrum there, you let that go, and those scrums turn into something else,
Didn't like it at the time, but looking back, it was the right call.
I mean it's not like he ran him, he backed into him when Fleury was out of the crease. I could see calling it if he plowed into him and you as a ref wanted to get a handle on things sure. That was ticky tack to me.
On this one I am more in the camp of no harm no foul, but if the puck had gone in the goal should have been disallowed.Really? It was I think one of those calls you have to make or you risk having that game get truly out of control, all night it was on the edge, scrum here, scrum there, you let that go, and those scrums turn into something else,
Didn't like it at the time, but looking back, it was the right call.
He may not be the strongest, but Amadio would be fine centering the third line provided Muzzin is back and they can shelter him some. I like Brodz, but he isn't gonna be the one setting up Kempe and Rieder, and they likewise. Amadio has the vision and natural playmaking ability that centers are born with. Brodz might pot more, but I think Amadio has a more rounded game. And really, Brodz or Amadio, Rieder is really the only plus defender on that line at this pointAmadio is not very strong physically. Considering how game 1 went, I wouldn't feel comfortable with him in the lineup. I agree that Thompson was strong on the dot, but Brodzinkski has a better shot and could do more damage offensively with Kempe and Reider. I am okay with moving Thompson to the fourth line instead of having Mitchel there.
I think Carter is left with too little skill for the second line. AI needs to wake up, manActually wouldn't mind seeing Kempe up there with Kopitar and Brown, with the way he's been playing of late, it's worth a shot, as Pearson and Iafallo haven't done much up there.
Kempe - Kopitar - Brown
Iafallo - Carter - Reider
Pearson - Amadio - Toffoli
Clifford - Thompson - Lewis
I think Mitchell is still the odd man out,
Not crazy about that 2nd line, but I don't see putting Reider with Amadio, that's TOO weak defensively
On this one I am more in the camp of no harm no foul, but if the puck had gone in the goal should have been disallowed.
I was using the hypothetical of keeping the 70's line intact, same as Alpha BravoActually wouldn't mind seeing Kempe up there with Kopitar and Brown, with the way he's been playing of late, it's worth a shot, as Pearson and Iafallo haven't done much up there.
Kempe - Kopitar - Brown
Iafallo - Carter - Reider
Pearson - Amadio - Toffoli
Clifford - Thompson - Lewis
I think Mitchell is still the odd man out,
Not crazy about that 2nd line, but I don't see putting Reider with Amadio, that's TOO weak defensively
I think Carter is left with too little skill for the second line. AI needs to wake up, man
My only issue with Thompson and Mitchell last night was that they're not very fast. Its was evident last night.
Clifford has absolutely cemented his status in the starting lineup, but that would be a waste of Carter as well, imoPossible, that's why I wasn't crazy about it,
Clifford - Carter - Reider would be fun to watch, I think Reider has that skill, and Clifford has just been motoring the past month or so
Clifford has absolutely cemented his status in the starting lineup, but that would be a waste of Carter as well, imo
Yeah. I understand going the vet route but put Amadio out there at least. Even Andreoff for his speed alone.And they were on the ice for the lone goal that was scored in the game, and that occurred because of horrendous coverage from the forwards up top.
I was on the Amadio bandwagon early in the year but he hasn’t been the same since Stevens sat him after he had 1 poor game after about 15 mostly good ones. Kind of similar to McNabb his rookie year. Not sure he can be trusted right now, his confidence is shot.
I thought he started playing well again before he was sat this last time, Herby. And when he was struggling, he was still used on the 2nd PP. I'm sure he knows he's on the bubble right now, hopefully getting intermittent play doesn't mess with him too much.I was on the Amadio bandwagon early in the year but he hasn’t been the same since Stevens sat him after he had 1 poor game after about 15 mostly good ones. Kind of similar to McNabb his rookie year. Not sure he can be trusted right now, his confidence is shot.
And they were on the ice for the lone goal that was scored in the game, and that occurred because of horrendous coverage from the forwards up top.
Yeah, that and his board play is really noticeable (in a bad way) when he's off. When he's on, he's crafty and shifty as f*** on the boardsThe games i've seen him in, he's been fine offensively, in the defensive zone, he makes the wrong read, tries to hold onto the puck too much, loses his coverage...