Why is the Lou fan's response when I point out Lou's failures here always "But Dubas is worse!". Yeah, Lou's protege might be worse than Lou himself, but that's hardly an argument for Lou being a great GM here, right?
And yeah, when you get a generational talent like Matthews, not to mention Marner and Nylander, all on their ELCs, you should be able to take advantage of it. Pitt had a record of 22-46 the year before they got Sid+Malkin. Next 3 years they got to conference semis, Stanley cup finals, and then had a cup.
Blackhawks were also terrible, then drafted Kane and Toews and won the cup on their ELCs.
In a cap world, having multiple stars on ELC is the biggest edge you can have, and Lou blew it. Yes, Dubas blew it too, but once more, that doesn't make Lou look any better.