Size without skill means nothing and both in high skill players is generally hard to find. Both Zucker and Granlund are basically the same size as Kane. Size isn't the detriment most think it is if you have the skill.
They look afraid and I don't know why. But more of it seems to be a confidence in their skills issue than an issue of needing more size.
Anyone else notice that we can't forecheck anymore? We used to be really good at hemming teams in their own zone, and getting them rattled.
Same with speed and really any other attribute you have to have more than one tool in you toolbox.Size without skill means nothing and both in high skill players is generally hard to find. Both Zucker and Granlund are basically the same size as Kane. Size isn't the detriment most think it is if you have the skill.
They look afraid and I don't know why. But more of it seems to be a confidence in their skills issue than an issue of needing more size.
Parise is 5' 11"
Parise is 5' 11"
Kane is but 1 player on a team full of other players who can do the roles you are expecting our smaller size players to do.
Parise is 5'9. He is your Patrick Kane player
Spurgeon is a Dman. He is also about the smallest guy on the team and 5'9 is stretching it greatly. Had a female friend stand by him for a photo who is 5'2 and he was barely taller than her. That is hard for a player in that role to be that small.
Zucker is 5'10
Meanwhile, Chicago:
Toews: 5'10
Hossa: 6'2
Keith 6'1
Seabrook: 6'3
Kane: 5'10
I mean I can do the whole team if you want. The Wild are undersized for this division especially. Look at Winnipeg, Nashville, Dallas and St. Louis. We are the smallest team. Hence why this team never hits or plays physical. They do not have anyone who can actually do it that is a threat.
Meanwhile teams like St. Louis have a ton who will hit. Chicago? No problem. Winnipeg, we already know. Nashville, they are not afraid to do it.
The Wild are an Eastern Conference team in the Western Conference.
This team is not losing because of size.This team is losing because of a lack of skill.Most of the young prospects from 2 years ago have not developed into the players they were expected to become and a number of the vets have regressed.
I'm definitely not saying they are losing because of height. But at key positions, it certainly does help. And at those key positions (Granlund, Zucker) it is failing horribly. What is going to upset me is if Chicago can still make it work after signing 2 players to 11.5M/yr contracts. Yet, we can't with 2 that are at 7.5M/yr for caphit.
I've stood beside him. I'm a hair over 6'. He ain't 5'11". Not that it matters much in the context of the conversation. Size matters, but so does strength, and overall build, as well as skills, speed, technique, mind, courage. They are all important.
Not gonna lie. That was Brodziak's fortre
Having a Norris caliber defenseman at $5.5M helps balance things.
What "key position" is Zucker?
Absolutely. I'm not going down that road just because it is a scapegoat. But it scares me to think that if this team can figure out how to make it work for them....they are going to be hurting. Having 2 players out for the series shouldn't be the doom and gloom to end of it. Parise should not be the reason this team loses a playoff series.
Nah, he was too slow to get in there, similar to Koivu.
Zucker used to be great. Same with Parise. Porter is usually decent, sometimes Coyle. Granlund tries, but he's not strong enough.
Tougher for C's to do it.
No, but perhaps playing the best team in the conference is.
Absolutely. I'm not going down that road just because it is a scapegoat. But it scares me to think that if this team can figure out how to make it work for them....they are going to be hurting. Having 2 players out for the series shouldn't be the doom and gloom to end of it. Parise should not be the reason this team loses a playoff series.
Can't buy that my friend. They've beaten the last 2 Central Division Champs in previous seasons. And both teams were not facing major injuries either.
Totally agree. A healthy Parise is our best forward, but they were benching Vanek prior to the injury, so how much of a loss is he, anyway?
We've had no help from Iowa(Dalpe... Really?) this year, and our "big guns" have turned into popguns, for the most part. Stoll and Jones...those were our acquisitions. Pretty underwhelming, but perhaps Fletcher saw where this team was heading and decided not to throw good money after bad.
We tried to get Johansen, and it didn't work out.
It's still the exception, not the rule.
Zucker used to be highly overrated.
You are the Yin to my Yang as always